The tech is just insane. Possibilities are endless, both good and bad.
I don’t like any of thisThis isn’t a bubble. This is the internet being discovered. There will be players that do not make it but this is the direction we are all headed. In my line of work we are already seeing full manufacturing sites move to complete automation and robotics. Eliminating 80% of there workforce overnight. The scary part is they could eliminate all manufacturing jobs with the exception of a maintenance guy or two. Interestingly enough in several plants I work in it’s the illegal labor that is being replaced by robots. I was in a plant several weeks ago that was using humans to hand label secondary packaging. All illegals per the PM.
Autonomous cars, robots performing complex surgeries, etc…. This is the future I believe. You’re literally living in the next Industrial Revolution.
Is anyone here worried that the massive influx of investment into AI is a house of cards that could absolutely crumble our economy?
Either there isn't the payoff of AI that these mega companies are expecting and thus crushing our economy when the rug is pulled.
Or AI succeeds and the workforce goes into massive unemployment thus crushing our economy.
It’s hard to imagine it will be addressed competently.I think the second scenario is pretty likely. Tons of jobs will be replaced by AI. The job market will have to adapt in some way, but it could get ugly on the unemployment side.
For those whose jobs remain, things will be better. Higher quality and lower costs in many areas. No more dealing with dumb people in basic jobs. But the gap is going to create a new dynamic that will have to be addressed.
It won’t be. It’ll be a disaster most likely as many people will lose their jobs and their meaning or purpose in life. I believe this will be a time of great excitement but great despair. AI and the technology associated with it are inevitable, it’s coming. Go to any college campus, the number one resource used is AI, that’s precisely how the internet was in the 90’s. You see where the internet is today, our very society is reliant on it. AI will be no different, only faster uptake.It’s hard to imagine it will be addressed competently.
Closer and closer to a dystopian society. How exciting lol.It won’t be. It’ll be a disaster most likely as many people will lose their jobs and their meaning or purpose in life. I believe this will be a time of great excitement but great despair. AI and the technology associated with it are inevitable, it’s coming. Go to any college campus, the number one resource used is AI, that’s precisely how the internet was in the 90’s. You see where the internet is today, our very society is reliant on it.
Yep, I think we are well otw to that. One argument to the madness that we are seeing in the judicial system (releasing violent criminals) is that the powers want you to feel unsafe. They want normies to feel scared so that they will be willing to give over more liberties and freedoms. Don’t wanna get stabbed on public transport, give us your permission for facial recognition scans prior to boarding to ensure safety. Could do the same thing with ID, don’t like illegals voting in elections, we will give you centralized ID. That’s how it starts.Closer and closer to a dystopian society. How exciting lol.
It’s hard to imagine it will be addressed competently.
What do the bottom 20% of our society do to make money and live in that scenario? Like, I'll be fine, my friends will be fine, we can all figure something out, have the brain capacity to learn and adapt in this new future. But there are certain people who are working all those jobs who are doing so for a reason. There are millions of people in that place. The people who the right say are just voting for the Dems for welfare, and the left say are just voting for the GOP bc they're dumb flag waving bigots. If that many low brain power jobs go away, what else will low brain power people do for a living wage?Oh I agree. Dems will push for UBI and higher taxes. Republicans will probably do nothing. Both are wrong.
It’s more likely you and I lose our jobs before plumbers and electricians. People that have trades will be fine. The lazy people that can work but don’t will continue doing what they do. That’s at least half of that 20%. Elon says anything that is automated or can be done with a computer will be. Things that require physical labor will still require it. Wiring a house for electricity or maintaining equipment in plants for instance. Most likely you’ll see some type of increased UBI or stipend.What do the bottom 20% of our society do to make money and live in that scenario? Like, I'll be fine, my friends will be fine, we can all figure something out, have the brain capacity to learn and adapt in this new future. But there are certain people who are working all those jobs who are doing so for a reason. There are millions of people in that place. The people who the right say are just voting for the Dems for welfare, and the left say are just voting for the GOP bc they're dumb flag waving bigots. If that many low brain power jobs go away, what else will low brain power people do for a living wage?
I disagree. I think we've created a system of dependency. Do you think certain groups have lower educational achievement and income are simply not capable of doing more?What do the bottom 20% of our society do to make money and live in that scenario? Like, I'll be fine, my friends will be fine, we can all figure something out, have the brain capacity to learn and adapt in this new future. But there are certain people who are working all those jobs who are doing so for a reason. There are millions of people in that place. The people who the right say are just voting for the Dems for welfare, and the left say are just voting for the GOP bc they're dumb flag waving bigots. If that many low brain power jobs go away, what else will low brain power people do for a living wage?
Right, I'm not as worried about tradesman. As I really am not considering them bottom 20% (def made that number up lol), as they learned a trade, so even if that specific trade is replaced, I feel confident they could learn another one, now more focused on something else in the new reality. I'm more speaking to the people working the line in factory's across the nation. Or working the line at fast food, or a cashier, or any other number of jobs that would be replaced.It’s more likely you and I lose our jobs before plumbers and electricians. People that have trades will be fine. The lazy people that can work but don’t will continue doing what they do. That’s at least half of that 20%. Elon says anything that is automated or can be done with a computer will be. Things that require physical labor will still require it. Wiring a house for electricity or maintaining equipment in plants for instance. Most likely you’ll see some type of increased UBI or stipend.
I am not really talking about people on welfare. But not everyone can become a robot technician. So you are thinking that we replace say 1/5 of all current jobs, but somehow we're also hiring 1/5th of all jobs quantity just in something else now? It feels like the point of all this is to have less people employed, but you think the same employment will happen, they'll just be doing something else now?I disagree. I think we've created a system of dependency. Do you think certain groups have lower educational achievement and income are simply not capable of doing more?
Furthermore people definitely vote for free stuff. People vote for the person who will forgive their student loans, give them healthcare subsidies, offer no tax on tips, OT, & SS. It's human nature.
What do the bottom 20% of our society do to make money and live in that scenario? Like, I'll be fine, my friends will be fine, we can all figure something out, have the brain capacity to learn and adapt in this new future. But there are certain people who are working all those jobs who are doing so for a reason. There are millions of people in that place. The people who the right say are just voting for the Dems for welfare, and the left say are just voting for the GOP bc they're dumb flag waving bigots. If that many low brain power jobs go away, what else will low brain power people do for a living wage?
Taking away peoples employment opportunities, not presenting another way to work, and then advising them to move to other countries that are less developed.Well some of those jobs will remain.
Another reason we need to flush the undocumented from the country. We will probably need a place to stick some of these people.
Others may need to move elsewhere. Less advanced countries which haven’t automated jobs perhaps. What we cannot and should not do, is pay people who are not contributing in some meaningful way.
Taking away peoples employment opportunities, not presenting another way to work, and then advising them to move to other countries that are less developed.
Genius plan so you pay less taxes.
I don't think we're going to lose 20% of all jobs. I think there's always work to do that will require human labor. I remember big companies used to have large rooms full of typists/data entry workers. Today there are almost none. At one time a large percent of the country worked on farms. today it's only about 1% but we're still at record payroll employment. The challenge for individuals is to learn the skills that are in demand at the time.I am not really talking about people on welfare. But not everyone can become a robot technician. So you are thinking that we replace say 1/5 of all current jobs, but somehow we're also hiring 1/5th of all jobs quantity just in something else now? It feels like the point of all this is to have less people employed, but you think the same employment will happen, they'll just be doing something else now?
For your second, not really interested in that argument at the moment, was just giving an example of the group of people.
Yeah, I definitely just made that % up, so no concerns on pushback on that. If the jobs just switch, and the bottom 10-20% of society just switches what jobs they perform, then no concerns from me. So hopefully, like with people on farms or typist, if those jobs shift, great. My main point is that we can't just automate all the jobs the bottom portion of society perform and then do nothing. Hopefully, as you mention, there are new roles that are created in the new world that those people are able to shift in to. I don't think not working is good for the soul, personally, and don't think anyone able should just sit at home either. I am just saying unless there are shifts, removing all of the low level jobs through automation and not having anything to replace won't fly either.I don't think we're going to lose 20% of all jobs. I think there's always work to do that will require human labor. I remember big companies used to have large rooms full of typists/data entry workers. Today there are almost none. At one time a large percent of the country worked on farms. today it's only about 1% but we're still at record payroll employment. The challenge for individuals is to learn the skills that are in demand at the time.
You asked what can the bottom 20% do and it seemed to me you thought they should be allowed to live on the dole via a universal basic income. Perhaps I misunderstood. Of course everybody can't be a robot technician but there are plenty of other things people can do. Today it might be plumbers, welders, electricians, construction workers, and home health aides. Just try to find somebody to watch you kids while you work. Tomorrow it's likely to be something else. Some people adapt and other don't. I just don't want to have half the people supporting the other half. IMO that's a death spiral.
I don't understand the AI hype. I understand Moore's law and that more calculations can be performed at higher and higher speeds and that will lead to new applications. I just haven't been able to envision the end products that will put people out of work. We have things like online ordering and self checkout that have eliminated jobs and I'm sure there will be a lot more. At one time companies printed law books but today we still have plenty of lawyers who do their research online. The first electronic spreadsheet wasn't developed until the 1983 but we still have plenty of accountants and bookkeepers but definitely fewer receptionists. I realize that technology advancements will continue at an ever increasing pace. It's just that I have confidence that there will continue to be lots of jobs for people to do. The question is will they learn new skills in order to remain relevant. Some will and some won't. I don't want to support the "wonts". I want them to step up and find a role somewhere in the economy.Yeah, I definitely just made that % up, so no concerns on pushback on that. If the jobs just switch, and the bottom 10-20% of society just switches what jobs they perform, then no concerns from me. So hopefully, like with people on farms or typist, if those jobs shift, great. My main point is that we can't just automate all the jobs the bottom portion of society perform and then do nothing. Hopefully, as you mention, there are new roles that are created in the new world that those people are able to shift in to. I don't think not working is good for the soul, personally, and don't think anyone able should just sit at home either. I am just saying unless there are shifts, removing all of the low level jobs through automation and not having anything to replace won't fly either.
As I often do, I really am not trying to act like an expert here. Just thought experimenting things through I guess. So I hope you're right and the job market just shifts elsewhere.
well, I for one could use a robot to do my daily exercise routine, clean the house, run errands.....Its an amazing claim. I know its blasphemy to question this man, but you have to wonder: HOW?
UBI is already here, although by a different terminology. How many parents are providing some form of support to their children or grandchildren?Oh I agree. Dems will push for UBI and higher taxes. Republicans will probably do nothing. Both are wrong.
Agree except for you last dvmbass sentence.It would be great to see our govt modernized. If we could just get rid of intuit’s lobbyists, we could have a very simple form for filling out taxes online.
It would also be nice to see expenses reduced for Medicare and Medicaid. So much bloat in those programs.
If DOGE was operated by a reasonably sane person instead of a bull in a china shop, it could have had a huge impact. Unfortunately under musks leadership it was a spectacular failure leading to thousands of deaths and pure chaos among critical government organizations.
Agree except for you last dvmbass sentence.
He's a weirdo. It is what it is. Dude probably rolled coal on Tesla's in 2015. Post Nazi salute he's all in on the guy.Cause you can't stand someone talking bad about your boy Elon. Your worship of that guy is weird.
Yep. Love the concept, hated the execution. Same with MAHA. Love a lot of the stated concepts, not a fan of the messaging and Vax offshoot, as well as the caving to corporate interests more and more.It would be great to see our govt modernized. If we could just get rid of intuit’s lobbyists, we could have a very simple form for filling out taxes online.
It would also be nice to see expenses reduced for Medicare and Medicaid. So much bloat in those programs.
If DOGE was operated by a reasonably sane person instead of a bull in a china shop, it could have had a huge impact. Unfortunately under musks leadership it was a spectacular failure leading to thousands of deaths and pure chaos among critical government organizations.
Hi folks, I just thought it might be nice to share some perspectives on what is occurring today in the US economy as it pertains to GDP and the AI space. Would love to share actual facts here with a focus on investments and long term outlooks.
I'm 45, got a CS degree in 2003 and had to deal with the head winds of the dot com bubble burst as well as the 2008 financial crisis. I'm now pretty far into many investments and trying to see 20 years into the future and make sure I can certainly plan for lifes happenings.
I have some concerns. I've read from analysists that there actually maybe a negative GDP in the US economy right now if you subtract AI. I personally am implementing AI in a fortune 200 company so I have some anecdotal understanding there. The numbers I'm looking at show that the current AI bubble maybe 17 times as big as the dot com one and 4 times as big as the subprime 2008 one.
I don't know if these figures are true. but I do know that the deals Ive been following like:
Nvidia gets Oracle investment https://www.techspot.com/news/108047-oracle-orders-400000-nvidia-chips-power-massive-stargate.html
and following the subsequent investments show just a passing around of money with no actual value.
View attachment 970351
Using these tools in the IT space, they are good and we are building out value but I have seen that the providers of these LLM's are actually losing money on the deals. https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/05/o...-pricey-chatgpt-pro-plan-ceo-sam-altman-says/
I'm aware of the race to AGI. But having used the tools and looked at this entire financing structure, I have to ask: Isn't this just a bubble?
InterestingHi folks, I just thought it might be nice to share some perspectives on what is occurring today in the US economy as it pertains to GDP and the AI space. Would love to share actual facts here with a focus on investments and long term outlooks.
I'm 45, got a CS degree in 2003 and had to deal with the head winds of the dot com bubble burst as well as the 2008 financial crisis. I'm now pretty far into many investments and trying to see 20 years into the future and make sure I can certainly plan for lifes happenings.
I have some concerns. I've read from analysists that there actually maybe a negative GDP in the US economy right now if you subtract AI. I personally am implementing AI in a fortune 200 company so I have some anecdotal understanding there. The numbers I'm looking at show that the current AI bubble maybe 17 times as big as the dot com one and 4 times as big as the subprime 2008 one.
I don't know if these figures are true. but I do know that the deals Ive been following like:
Nvidia gets Oracle investment https://www.techspot.com/news/108047-oracle-orders-400000-nvidia-chips-power-massive-stargate.html
and following the subsequent investments show just a passing around of money with no actual value.
View attachment 970351
Using these tools in the IT space, they are good and we are building out value but I have seen that the providers of these LLM's are actually losing money on the deals. https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/05/o...-pricey-chatgpt-pro-plan-ceo-sam-altman-says/
I'm aware of the race to AGI. But having used the tools and looked at this entire financing structure, I have to ask: Isn't this just a bubble?
Yah I've been following quantum for a while. Its absolutely incredible technology and if and when it really arrives in the consumer market its going to be a big deal.Interesting
I believe Blurry believes the way technology is changing, there is a good chance of a technology disruption that is being overlooked.
Do you have any thoughts on Quantum? It seems to be coming much faster than anticipated?
Do you have any thoughts on Quantum?
What are the leading quantum companies and what technologies are you referring to? That’s kinda vague. Quantum computings impact will not be flooding the market with new coins. That’s not the concern with quantum and crypto at all.Yah I've been following quantum for a while. Its absolutely incredible technology and if and when it really arrives in the consumer market its going to be a big deal.
What about crypto markets that get flooded with new coins due to quantum computing mining?