I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.
It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.
Congrats to the Backup QB of TulaneHis team made the CFP.
That’s ridiculous. He hasn’t done anything this year.I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.
You have a good argument that Sully would have known the offense better when we played ISU and a good chance Iowa wins that game, the Indy game and the Oregon game if everything stays pretty much the same. We would have had Stratton and Brown as the 2 main backups to start the season. Sully could have had a big year with the hawks
Did I say anything about his play this year, Noooooooooo. I talked about him last year. I said he was a good runner above avg actually which we all saw and a decent passer.That’s ridiculous. He hasn’t done anything this year.
Agreed 100%. MG definitely had a higher QB IQ though…Sully for sure had a couple of ‘WTF’ moments.I’d say at very, very best, you could make the argument that Sullivan and Gronowski would be a wash, and that would be a stretch. I don’t think he’s a better runner than Gronowski and he didn’t tear it up with his passing either
Then there needs to be a separate G5 playoff. All BCS teams need a path to the championship.Tulane shouldn’t even be there to start with. It’s a friggin joke. Texas would truck them by 50.
Texas stinks, but carry on.Tulane shouldn’t even be there to start with. It’s a friggin joke. Texas would truck them by 50.
You can't use Sullivan's last year production vs Gronowski's current year.Did I say anything about his play this year, Noooooooooo. I talked about him last year. I said he was a good runner above avg actually which we all saw and a decent passer.
Who cares what he did this year. The point I answered was we probably would have got a similar product and result from Sullivan as Grono this year and used money for other players.
Dont put words in my mouth
He was a good Hawk. I'm happy for him.Congrats to the Backup QB of Tulane
10 point win that exposed A&M you mean? Texas lost to a crappy Florida team and needed overtime to beat both Kentucky and MsSt before getting rolled by 25 points by Georgia last month.They just trucked A&M
He was fearless, too fearless. He would have probably ended up injured again similar to last year.I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.
You have a good argument that Sully would have known the offense better when we played ISU and a good chance Iowa wins that game, the Indy game and the Oregon game if everything stays pretty much the same. We would have had Stratton and Brown as the 2 main backups to start the season. Sully could have had a big year with the hawks
Left to be a starter and ended up as the back-up.That’s ridiculous. He hasn’t done anything this year.
Peeps on here are not very smart, lol.He's 19 for 29, 222 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT...... for the season. Considering he doesn't get playing time for Tulane (or Northwestern or Iowa previously), consider me skeptical on him taking us to the CFP.
NoAnd I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.
It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.
At A&M home field.10 point win that exposed A&M you mean? Texas lost to a crappy Florida team and needed overtime to beat both Kentucky and MsSt before getting rolled by 25 points by Georgia last month.
And what does this have to do with Tulane again? If a team got left out because of Tulane, it certainly wasn't Texas who got passed in the rankings by ND and BYU for that last spot.
And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.
It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.