Congrats to Brendan Sullivan

DukeSlater

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2023
1,910
4,501
113
And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.

It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,487
3,768
113
And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.

It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.
I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.

You have a good argument that Sully would have known the offense better when we played ISU and a good chance Iowa wins that game, the Indy game and the Oregon game if everything stays pretty much the same. We would have had Stratton and Brown as the 2 main backups to start the season. Sully could have had a big year with the hawks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1751511852

Hawkinne

Freshman
Iowa Swarm member
Jan 14, 2003
61
84
18
I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.

You have a good argument that Sully would have known the offense better when we played ISU and a good chance Iowa wins that game, the Indy game and the Oregon game if everything stays pretty much the same. We would have had Stratton and Brown as the 2 main backups to start the season. Sully could have had a big year with the hawks
That’s ridiculous. He hasn’t done anything this year.
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,487
3,768
113
That’s ridiculous. He hasn’t done anything this year.
Did I say anything about his play this year, Noooooooooo. I talked about him last year. I said he was a good runner above avg actually which we all saw and a decent passer.

Who cares what he did this year. The point I answered was we probably would have got a similar product and result from Sullivan as Grono this year and used money for other players.

Dont put words in my mouth
 

Rambler Hawk

All-Conference
Oct 10, 2001
2,049
2,760
113
I’d say at very, very best, you could make the argument that Sullivan and Gronowski would be a wash, and that would be a stretch. I don’t think he’s a better runner than Gronowski and he didn’t tear it up with his passing either
Agreed 100%. MG definitely had a higher QB IQ though…Sully for sure had a couple of ‘WTF’ moments. 😎
 

AFM22

Heisman
Oct 31, 2022
19,147
36,520
113
Tulane shouldn’t even be there to start with. It’s a friggin joke. Texas would truck them by 50.
Then there needs to be a separate G5 playoff. All BCS teams need a path to the championship.

The rule is top 5 conference champions get an auto bid. They are among those 5.
 

Burghawk87

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
800
1,426
93
Did I say anything about his play this year, Noooooooooo. I talked about him last year. I said he was a good runner above avg actually which we all saw and a decent passer.

Who cares what he did this year. The point I answered was we probably would have got a similar product and result from Sullivan as Grono this year and used money for other players.

Dont put words in my mouth
You can't use Sullivan's last year production vs Gronowski's current year.
 
Dec 20, 2022
201
721
93
I liked Sullivan and what he gave Iowa last year. Realistically though, how many games would he have been healthy and available for with his reckless style of running?

He was knocked out of the UCLA game last year and then missed the Maryland and Nebraska games. In the bowl game versus Missouri he took a couple of hellacious shots due to not sliding or knowing when a play was dead and to get rid of the ball.
 

Jonesy5960

Heisman
Feb 1, 2023
5,980
12,329
113
They just trucked A&M
10 point win that exposed A&M you mean? Texas lost to a crappy Florida team and needed overtime to beat both Kentucky and MsSt before getting rolled by 25 points by Georgia last month.

And what does this have to do with Tulane again? If a team got left out because of Tulane, it certainly wasn't Texas who got passed in the rankings by ND and BYU for that last spot.
 

HawkeyeGenius

Heisman
Iowa Swarm member
Nov 25, 2021
14,318
23,664
113
I liked Sullivan and his ability to make plays. he was an above avg passer. Grono had an overall nice completion percentage for the year of 63%, he was off on some and his receivers dropped some, but he made some really good throws.

You have a good argument that Sully would have known the offense better when we played ISU and a good chance Iowa wins that game, the Indy game and the Oregon game if everything stays pretty much the same. We would have had Stratton and Brown as the 2 main backups to start the season. Sully could have had a big year with the hawks
He was fearless, too fearless. He would have probably ended up injured again similar to last year.
 

93hawkeye

Senior
Sep 19, 2004
340
554
93
And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.

It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.
No
 

WeBeHerkin

All-American
Aug 5, 2016
4,514
5,150
113
10 point win that exposed A&M you mean? Texas lost to a crappy Florida team and needed overtime to beat both Kentucky and MsSt before getting rolled by 25 points by Georgia last month.

And what does this have to do with Tulane again? If a team got left out because of Tulane, it certainly wasn't Texas who got passed in the rankings by ND and BYU for that last spot.
At A&M home field.
 
Aug 14, 2025
197
286
63
And I will maintain that if Iowa had stuck with Sully and used the money they spent on Gronowski to shore up other spots, Iowa would be headed to the CFP too. Sully knew Lester's system, is a better runner--quicker and faster than MG--and would have been a better passer. There was no good reason to go with MG, especially when he was going to miss the spring, over a talented, experienced veteran like Sully.

It's another unknowable, but I said it at the time, and I still believe it. Others may disagree at their own jeopardy.

Yeah, his 222 passing yards, along with his 76 rushing yards, bear that out.