Make America Healthy Again
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Assuming everything claimed is true, I am all aboard going after situations like this to the full extent of the law.
I am currently in Vermont. One thing abundantly different is that the people are fit and outside. While taxes may be high, it's beautiful here and the cities are clean and beautiful.
It's a friggin' MIRACLE! Thank you, Jesus! And thank you, Shepherd to Mankind!
LOL ...
Do mine eyes deceive me? Yet another refugee from the PSU Test Board posting here?! Welcome, Knickslions69!
Hell no!!!
Reminder - RFK Jr. exposes a massive corporate betrayal. Over 100 members of Congress, who took money from Danish giant Novo Nordisk, are pushing to make Medicare fund Ozempic at $1,500/month.
The cost to taxpayers if 74% of obese Americans get it? $3 TRILLION a year.
For half that price, we could give every American 3 organic meals a day & a gym membership. Why are our leaders serving a foreign corporation instead of American farmers and families?
Reminder - RFK Jr. exposes a massive corporate betrayal. Over 100 members of Congress, who took money from Danish giant Novo Nordisk, are pushing to make Medicare fund Ozempic at $1,500/month.
The cost to taxpayers if 74% of obese Americans get it? $3 TRILLION a year.
For half that price, we could give every American 3 organic meals a day & a gym membership. Why are our leaders serving a foreign corporation instead of American farmers and families?
They should just charge them for it. Insurance companies should charge obese people higher premiums and Medicare should impose a surcharge on your contributions/premiums if you are obese. This isn't rocket science. These people are costing the rest of us a ton of money with their excess healthcare costs due to poor lifestyle choices. They should pay for it, not the rest of us.
Since this will probably lead you to demonize cancer research, I'd advise you to not blindly accept data from teenage tiddlywinks on the beach, before you spread their gibberish .
"No, there has not been a 75% increase in cancer deaths since the 1990s. In fact, the opposite is true when examining age-adjusted death rates (the standard metric used to account for population growth and aging), which have declined substantially in both the United States and globally due to advances in screening, treatment, and risk factor reduction (e.g., lower smoking rates).
US Trends
- Raw Number of Cancer Deaths:
- In 1991 (peak rate year): ~505,000 deaths.
- In 2020: ~606,000 deaths.
- This is a ~20% increase, despite US population growth of ~25% (from 252 million to 331 million). The modest rise reflects better survival rates offsetting some incidence growth.
- Age-Adjusted Death Rate:
- Declined by 34% from 1991 to 2022 (from ~215 per 100,000 to ~142 per 100,000).
- Annual decline averaged 1.5–2% since the early 1990s, averting ~4.5 million US deaths.
- 2025 Projection: ~618,000 deaths expected, with continued rate declines.
Extremely disturbing. We are facing pure evil imo.
This is one of the most important videos you can watch
American Farmer says he’s tested his soil and it has 5x the amount of aluminum it used to have. The GMO seeds grow fine, all his heirloom seed crops are all the sudden failing (shows proof)
Bill Gates is creating GMO seeds that grow in aluminum rich soil. I’ve posted the video proof
We are being ruled by extremely evil people and one day only their GMO seeds will be the ones that grow. Total control of our food
RFK Jr and Head of the EPA Lee Zeldin both promised to stop them spraying these chemicals in our sky. The need to move faster
This is one of the most important videos you can watch
American Farmer says he’s tested his soil and it has 5x the amount of aluminum it used to have. The GMO seeds grow fine, all his heirloom seed crops are all the sudden failing (shows proof)
Bill Gates is creating GMO seeds that grow in aluminum rich soil. I’ve posted the video proof
We are being ruled by extremely evil people and one day only their GMO seeds will be the ones that grow. Total control of our food
RFK Jr and Head of the EPA Lee Zeldin both promised to stop them spraying these chemicals in our sky. The need to move faster
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “We’re about to release dietary guidelines that are going to change the food culture in this country. They’re going to change the kinds of food the military gets. They’re going to change the kind of food our children get. We’re releasing those in December.”
About time!
this time I hope carbohydrates are at the top of the food chain. Enough with this broccoli and spinach thing
MAGA logic: justifying an outrageous lie with another outrageous lie. The math works!
I'm wearing it now. Between 200 and 205 for years basically with a few short spikes.
Last edited:
Florida Quietly Drops $140 Million Bombshell: State Backs “Unthinkable” Cancer Research Into Ivermectin, Fasting, and Nutrition-Based Therapies That Could Change Everything
While federal agencies continue to guard the pharma-dominated “cut, poison, and burn” model, Florida is moving in the opposite direction — fast.
Through its Cancer Innovation Fund, the state has now directed an astonishing $140 million toward high-impact cancer research, funding projects that would be unthinkable in other states — including studies on ivermectin, fasting, and nutrition-based therapies for cancer prevention and treatment.
This marks year three of the initiative, and the shift is seismic. For decades, doctors who explored integrative or non-pharmaceutical cancer treatments risked losing their licenses. Now one of America’s largest states is not only protecting that research but funding it.
Florida’s message is clear: stop criminalizing innovation, and let science — not pharma — lead.
These are 12-month turnaround studies, designed to get data to the public quickly — not buried in bureaucracy or stalled for grants.
Vitamin D, metabolic therapies, exercise, and nutrient-based interventions — once dismissed as “alternative” — are now being put under the microscope with state support.
If successful, Florida could rewrite the rules of cancer care — proving that healing doesn’t have to come from a pill bottle or a radiation beam.
This is the kind of medical independence the rest of the country should be watching.
A friend told me recently that his wife whose an MD at a major local hospital is seriously considering leaving medicine.
Not because she stopped caring about patients or long hours but because of the pressure from above.
In her system, every diagnosis comes with the expectation of prescribing the drug that matches the code.
If she doesn’t? She gets questioned. Evaluated. Sometimes even financially penalized through performance metrics tied to “quality measures." This sounds noble but really just means “Did you give the patient the medication the system expects?”
He said she's been dealing with it for a while and it seems to get worse every year.
She didn’t go into medicine to be a cog in a pharmaceutical machine. She went in to actually help people.
But the hospital’s incentives don’t reward lifestyle coaching, nutrition conversations, movement prescriptions, or digging into root causes.
There’s no bonus for helping a patient reverse insulin resistance.
But there's plenty tied to metrics on prescribing statins, GLP-1s, antihypertensives, SSRIs, and anything else that fits neatly into a billing code.
And the saddest part? This isn’t rare.
Between pay-for-performance systems, pharma influence, and hospital revenue structures tied to drug utilization, the entire system nudges doctors away from thinking and toward prescribing.
Many MDs feel trapped: If they want to practice slow, thoughtful medicine there’s no time. Or if they want to focus on root causes there’s no billing code.
If they want to avoid unnecessary meds they risk being flagged for “not meeting standards.” So many of the good doctors are quietly slipping away.
And we wonder why chronic disease keeps rising.
A system that incentivizes prescriptions will always produce more prescriptions.
A system that rewards dependency will always create more dependent patients.
And a system that punishes critical thinkers will eventually lose all of them.
My friend’s wife isn’t leaving medicine. She’s being pushed out of it.
And until we fix the incentives, she won’t be the last.
And this is why you are lost.
This is a made up story, with no facts or names, and you think it means something.
What facts are there? Names,where she works, what is her speciality?
Honestly, not trying to insult you, but these are the types of posts made to inflame and feed a narrative. This is most likely a bot.
If you see a post with nothing but anecdotal info, it's probably false, or at least isn't proof of anything.
I don’t know if it’s a real story or not, but many of the points made are valid. Incentives to prescribe not heal. Driven by billing codes vs. outcomes.
The political establishment literally spends billions of US taxpayer dollars a year subsidizing the growing of corn and soy.
To make HFCS and seed oils. So they can be put in massive quantities into the US food supply.
While they're also trying to regulate ranches and farms out of existence and banning the sale of raw milk and going after farmers that insist on trying to sell it.
The public here in the US appears to be slowly waking up to the fact the same people that pulled all kinds of shenanigans on the American public with COVID and their pet COVID vaccines perhaps do not really have their best interests at heart when it comes to their diet/health 'expert' advice and their extensive red tape regulations.
Here you go sissy boy libs. RFK Jr getting it done. Bow down and hope to be like him in your next life.
RFK Jr is onto something here for sure.
RFK Jr: Why did "gluten allergies" go up so much in 2006?
"we discovered that Roundup was a desiccant. And what that means, if you spray it on a crop, it will actually dry out the crop. And one of the big enemies of the farmer is that if there's rain around the time of harvest, their crops can get wet, and they get moldy, and then it ruins the entire silo."
"What Monsanto did is they began telling farmers, spray this on the crop, on your wheat, right before harvest or at the time of harvest. And it was so popular that about 85 % of the Roundup that has been used in history has been used since 2006. A large part of that is as a desiccant. And what that meant, is for the first time they're spraying it on food right at harvest."
"Not early in the season when they have a chance to wash off, but actually just before you're going to eat it. And they're spraying it for the first time on wheat because there was no such thing as Roundup Ready Wheat. They started spraying it on wheat as a desiccant. And so 2006 marks the day when suddenly these gluten allergies began exploding. The celiac disease and all these kind of wheat problems that we started seeing in this country."
If you measure it back and say, when did it start? You can look and draw a red line at this 2006 and it's the year that they began spraying it on.
RFK Jr: Why did "gluten allergies" go up so much in 2006?
"we discovered that Roundup was a desiccant. And what that means, if you spray it on a crop, it will actually dry out the crop. And one of the big enemies of the farmer is that if there's rain around the time of harvest, their crops can get wet, and they get moldy, and then it ruins the entire silo."
"What Monsanto did is they began telling farmers, spray this on the crop, on your wheat, right before harvest or at the time of harvest. And it was so popular that about 85 % of the Roundup that has been used in history has been used since 2006. A large part of that is as a desiccant. And what that meant, is for the first time they're spraying it on food right at harvest."
"Not early in the season when they have a chance to wash off, but actually just before you're going to eat it. And they're spraying it for the first time on wheat because there was no such thing as Roundup Ready Wheat. They started spraying it on wheat as a desiccant. And so 2006 marks the day when suddenly these gluten allergies began exploding. The celiac disease and all these kind of wheat problems that we started seeing in this country."
If you measure it back and say, when did it start? You can look and draw a red line at this 2006 and it's the year that they began spraying it on.
boy sounds like a breakthrough, but is it really that simple?
