That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.I thought it was a horrible decision at the time (and still do), but my thought was that GS wanted the offense to get some reps due to the 2 quick TD’s.
Practice.
Remember, this was a scrimmage for us.
It didn't work. They need more practice.
What risk?That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.
Practice.
Remember, this was a scrimmage for us.
It didn't work. They need more practice.
It wasn't a laugher at the time of the onside kickThis exactly. The game was a laugher, so might as well try out plays like that in real time game conditions.
It wasn't a laugher at the time of the onside kick
I disagree. It was 20-3 with 8 minutes to go in the 2nd quarter, against Norfolk State. Did you want to wait until we had 40 on the board? That's rubbing it in. You attempt an onsides kick to work on it "while its still a game".this
I sent a text to a friend "we just tried an onside kick that failed. it's too early and the score is too close to be trying trick plays"
It was against Norfolk State, there was no risk.That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.
It wasn’t Scullion on the onside kick, they put the backup in for it. The TV crew called it out as they were setting up for it.Jack has been great all year kicking the ball into the endzone. He needs to practice the onsides kick more.
Got it. I didn't know they put in a different kicker.It wasn’t Scullion on the onside kick, they put the backup in for it. The TV crew called it out as they were setting up for it.
There was one done this season. Forget where and by whom. But did see it on a highlight show.It was great in this specific way.. if Greg found out that it needed a lot more practice before he'd consider trying it again, unless absolutely forced by the game situation. Even then.. maybe he tries a bloop.. always wondered why you never see an onsides attempt where teh kicker blasts it directly at an opponent hoping for a rebound. They must practice different tactics and that why everyone goes for the high-hop thing.
Army…There was one done this season. Forget where and by whom. But did see it on a highlight show.
They literally kicked it right at someone.
Said it in the game thread, I thought it was stupid to practice such a thing and put it on tape for no good reason. That’s a play you can work on in practice just as easily as in a game.
Please explain yourself since Norfolk State wasn’t expecting it and they would have easily recovered if the kick went far enough. Additionally they had a wall of red jerseys out front so whoever recovered likely would’ve advanced the ball as well. Clearly you missed all of this.Another Schiano brain fart. Did he take any brown acid at Bucknell?
Already explained ITTPlease explain yourself since Norfolk State wasn’t expecting it and they would have easily recovered if the kick went far enough. Additionally they had a wall of red jerseys out front so whoever recovered likely would’ve advanced the ball as well. Clearly you missed all of this.
If we use our backup kicker to kick onsides kicks, it just provided a huge data point for no reason.it didn’t matter at all. Provided no data. Was not a risk as there was never a chance we were losing the game. He got a back up a situational practice kick. That’s all.
Already explained ITT
3:45 min mark
As your favorite Rutgers Football poster would say "we were not losing that game". So no real risk.That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.
The kicking team can't advance a recovered onside kick.Please explain yourself since Norfolk State wasn’t expecting it and they would have easily recovered if the kick went far enough. Additionally they had a wall of red jerseys out front so whoever recovered likely would’ve advanced the ball as well. Clearly you missed all of this.
And the benefit of trying ? Pointless in the game. One ‘practice’ OSK rep serves no purpose and the idea he wanted to get an immediate series for the O is just as obtuse. If any unit needs more experience and coaching it’s the D, which happened anyway, but 50 yards closer to the end zone than if kicked off. No sound logic to it .As your favorite Rutgers Football poster would say "we were not losing that game". So no real risk.
The benefit is called scoring more points if you recover. And they would have done the latter if it went the required distance.And the benefit of trying ? Pointless in the game. One ‘practice’ OSK rep serves no purpose and the idea he wanted to get an immediate series for the O is just as obtuse. If any unit needs more experience and coaching it’s the D, which happened anyway, but 50 yards closer to the end zone than if kicked off. No sound logic to it .
They score a touchdown there on a short field and it's 20-10. This may have been the dumbest thing Greg did since the time out in Illinois gameI disagree. It was 20-3 with 8 minutes to go in the 2nd quarter, against Norfolk State. Did you want to wait until we had 40 on the board? That's rubbing it in. You attempt an onsides kick to work on it "while its still a game".
What risk? It was Norfolk State.That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.
Risk? This game was a blowout. It was always going to be a blowout. GS was trying things and obviously had zero fear that this would be a competitive game.That’s hardly justification. Risk far outweighed reward.
Uhm....we had a guy not only do so BUT go all the way to the end zone for a TD, do a flip into the end zone AND get a grin-and-eye-roll from Greg for doing so ( @PatrickRU92's favorite: The Beef O'Brady's Bowl).The kicking team can't advance a recovered onside kick.
And the benefit of trying ? Pointless in the game. One ‘practice’ OSK rep serves no purpose and the idea he wanted to get an immediate series for the O is just as obtuse. If any unit needs more experience and coaching it’s the D, which happened anyway, but 50 yards closer to the end zone than if kicked off. No sound logic to it .
This exactly right here. Again, IIRC, we did this in the 2023 season early, a miserable failed onside kick, then ran one to perfection against MSU during the comeback. Also - again IIRC - there was a noticeable difference between the 2 attempts (aside from fail/successful).Greg is quite intentional with his decisions in these types of games. It could be as simple as wanted to change things up and put some wild goose chase film out there for opposing coaches to thumb through. It was Norfolk State. It just doesn’t matter either way
We returned that kick. It’s the kicking team that can’t advance a recoveryUhm....we had a guy not only do so BUT go all the way to the end zone for a TD, do a flip into the end zone AND get a grin-and-eye-roll from Greg for doing so ( @PatrickRU92's favorite: The Beef O'Brady's Bowl).
Has that rule since changed?