Rutgers Athletics expected to sign new apparel contract with Nike

pmvon

All-American
Jan 30, 2007
7,614
7,169
0
Nowhere near the big boys but nice to see the big jump in revenue.
Will need it jump to 6 million a year in principal means about 1.2 million or almost a 1 million more a year for paying players.

Edit: it’s 3 million a year.
 
Last edited:

Section124

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
17,298
22,079
96
How do these deals work? I read we signed with a 3rd party company that supplies Nike. Is that really signing with Nike? Or is that company a division of Nike?
 

PSU_Nut_rivals17625

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
14,642
2,609
113
The fact they went without a deal for a year is criminal. I can’t see how the ball was dropped on this. Talk about poorly handled. I guess the AD was more focused on women’s gymnastics than getting this done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRZEER

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,245
13,041
113
Why isn't this type deal made at the conference or league level?
Wouldn't that make more sense?

Everyone complains about players "wanting their own" but the actual spirit of college athletics seems to be "every program/conference get their own and give two sh@ts about anyone else or the collective improvement of college athletics."
 

RUBlackout

All-American
Mar 11, 2008
10,955
7,075
113
How do these deals work? I read we signed with a 3rd party company that supplies Nike. Is that really signing with Nike? Or is that company a division of Nike?
No chance we signed with a 3rd party company rather than with Nike directly
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
33,738
49,436
113
The fact they went without a deal for a year is criminal. I can’t see how the ball was dropped on this. Talk about poorly handled. I guess the AD was more focused on women’s gymnastics than getting this done.
it's Rutgers
every single person in the athletic and marketing departments needs to be fired

have yet to meet a single person that doesn't suck

I also don't think this deal is as good as some think as it still puts us at the bottom
 

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,790
0
The fact they went without a deal for a year is criminal. I can’t see how the ball was dropped on this. Talk about poorly handled. I guess the AD was more focused on women’s gymnastics than getting this done.
I agree, but no Penn State fan, ever in the history of life, should be throwing stones after a three decade long, institutionally hidden, child rape cover-up
 

HeavenUniv.

Heisman
Sep 21, 2004
135,536
16,404
0
Why isn't this type deal made at the conference or league level?
Wouldn't that make more sense?

Everyone complains about players "wanting their own" but the actual spirit of college athletics seems to be "every program/conference get their own and give two sh@ts about anyone else or the collective improvement of college athletics."
Except for local shops in college towns ( ex. Scarlet Fever in New Brunswick), the Big Ten needs to make sure all companies that get a license to produce a product ( ex. Alarm clocks that play a school fight song) for schools have to make them for all Big Ten universities.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,816
54,061
102
Except for local shops in college towns (ex. Scarlet Fever in New Brunswick), the Big Ten needs to make sure all companies that get a license to produce a product (ex. Alarm clocks that play a school fight song) for schools have to make them for all Big Ten universities.
I love that idea.
 

Section124

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
17,298
22,079
96
No chance we signed with a 3rd party company rather than with Nike directly
Here is part of the article from Carino:

The university’s board of governors during Tuesday’s meeting is expected to authorize a contract with BSN Sports, a third-party distributor, that makes Nike the official outfitter of the Scarlet Knights. The deal will begin July 1, 2025, and be for a five-year team, with one optional five-year extension, with a total estimated value of $30 million, according to documents on the school's website.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRZEER

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,750
12,429
113
The fact they went without a deal for a year is criminal. I can’t see how the ball was dropped on this. Talk about poorly handled. I guess the AD was more focused on women’s gymnastics than getting this done.
“ He interviewed very well” our AD on previous horrible Football hire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRZEER
Dec 17, 2008
45,214
16,775
0
I love that idea.
That is a good idea. I actually have the RU Rah Rah etc.,,as a ringtone for one of my contacts.

I don’t use an alarm clock much but never thought to look if I can set that up the same way.

Edit: yea you can set up an alarm to be custom just like the ringtone…makes sense
 
Last edited:

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
Surprised there's not more discussion of this. Is there another thread somewhere? Feels like a huge indictment of our Athletic Department
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
Another thread where something positive turns into a negative for some fans.



I mean...what's positive here? We have the worst apparel license in the big ten...not even a direct deal with Nike. According to Fonseca it's an arrangement on par with mid and low majors. He gave the list of D1 schools that have deals through these BSN clowns.

Cincinnati, Hofstra, Wichita State, Charlotte, North Texas, Vermont, New Hampshire, Alaska.
 
Last edited:

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,582
87,552
113
I mean...what's positive here? We have the worst apparel license in the big ten...not even a direct deal with Nike. According to Fonseca it's an arrangement on par with mid and low majors. He gave the list of D1 schools that have deals through these BSN clowns.

Cincinnati, Hofstra, Wichita State, Charlotte, North Texas, Vermont, New Hampshire, Alaska.
If "worst" is your takeaway, you have reading comprehension problems and like to put your own spin on things. Just like in the drones thread. That's OK, and we are all different.
Rutgers' deal is $6M/year for 5 years.
Illinois- $4.45M/year
Indiana- $5.4M/year (10 years)
Iowa- $4M/year
Better than Minnesota's and Michigan State's deals too. Maryland's deal is with their sugar daddy alumnus.

Please explain how more money than our peer B1G institutions is the "worst" deal in B1G.
Be happy, it's fun!
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
If "worst" is your takeaway, you have reading comprehension problems and like to put your own spin on things. Just like in the drones thread. That's OK, and we are all different.
Rutgers' deal is $6M/year for 5 years.
Illinois- $4.45M/year
Indiana- $5.4M/year (10 years)
Iowa- $4M/year
Better than Minnesota's and Michigan State's deals too. Maryland's deal is with their sugar daddy alumnus.

Please explain how more money than our peer B1G institutions is the "worst" deal in B1G.
Be happy, it's fun!

Ha. It's you who has reading comprehension AND perhaps basic arithmetic problems. Read the deal again.

"The proposal is for a five-year deal with an option of a five-year extension worth a combined $30 million “inclusive of the extension term.”

No wonder you believe in flying saucers. Aren't you embarrassed to be so rudely and aggressively incorrect? How about an apology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fat Koko

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,750
12,429
113
If "worst" is your takeaway, you have reading comprehension problems and like to put your own spin on things. Just like in the drones thread. That's OK, and we are all different.
Rutgers' deal is $6M/year for 5 years.
Illinois- $4.45M/year
Indiana- $5.4M/year (10 years)
Iowa- $4M/year
Better than Minnesota's and Michigan State's deals too. Maryland's deal is with their sugar daddy alumnus.

Please explain how more money than our peer B1G institutions is the "worst" deal in B1G.
Be happy, it's fun!
Let’s take that $6M per year and put that into our NIL. one day
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,582
87,552
113
Ha. It's you who has reading comprehension AND perhaps basic arithmetic problems. Read the deal again.

"The proposal is for a five-year deal with an option of a five-year extension worth a combined $30 million “inclusive of the extension term.”

No wonder you believe in flying saucers. Aren't you embarrassed to be so rudely and aggressively incorrect? How about an apology.
How about GFY.
The only place saying "inclusive of the extension term" is the highly suspect NJ.com sewer, a place you love to swim in, bc you are a turd at the bottom of the sewer.
Can't find any official documents or minutes from the BOG. I know people who can get the facts, and until they come out, I will not share them publicly or with you, for sure.
But even taking the dimmest and dimwitted view you usually take, the RU deal is not worst. It's better than Minnesota's at $2.2M and better than Michigan State's at $2.1 Million.

If you want to lob insults and start war, make sure you are correct. Otherwise, be prepared to get annihilated like you have gotten on the drone thread. Have a great life, you are not worth any more of my valuable time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU_rivals

HeavenUniv.

Heisman
Sep 21, 2004
135,536
16,404
0
Another thread where something positive turns into a negative for some fans.


It wasn’t that long ago that we would have begged to get $6 million a year from a TV deal, let alone a merchandise deal. Maybe it isn’t Ohio State, Texas, State Penn level, but it isn’t like we signed with Keds or Etonic.[
What the heck is up with my Get Smart Shoe phone?—Knightshift didn’t write the second paragraph lol.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knight Shift

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
How about GFY.
The only place saying "inclusive of the extension term" is the highly suspect NJ.com sewer, a place you love to swim in, bc you are a turd at the bottom of the sewer.
Can't find any official documents or minutes from the BOG. I know people who can get the facts, and until they come out, I will not share them publicly or with you, for sure.
But even taking the dimmest and dimwitted view you usually take, the RU deal is not worst. It's better than Minnesota's at $2.2M and better than Michigan State's at $2.1 Million.

If you want to lob insults and start war, make sure you are correct. Otherwise, be prepared to get annihilated like you have gotten on the drone thread. Have a great life, you are not worth any more of my valuable time.

This is priceless. "Make sure you are correct" when, according to published reports, you are off on the amount of our deal by 100% lmfao.
And now that we know you're a boor who understands nothing, I find all your other numbers suspect. Michigan State, for instance, HAD a deal worth $34 million over ten years, AND they recently extended and increased it. That was signed in 2016! So you are wrong yet again. How much will you turn out to be wrong about? And you're delusional about the drones too considering I have every federal agency on my side and you have morons who think Venus is an Iranian invasion.

As for Minnesota, I haven't yet found info on their latest deal. But considering they have a direct deal with Nike I'm sure it will also turn out to be more. You know who has a third party deal with BSN? Minnesota State. If we do turn out to scrape ahead of Minnesots then yay I guess. We're only the second worst in the entire conference in addition to being, apparently, the only P5 team wirh a BSN deal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
33,738
49,436
113
If "worst" is your takeaway, you have reading comprehension problems and like to put your own spin on things. Just like in the drones thread. That's OK, and we are all different.
Rutgers' deal is $6M/year for 5 years.
Illinois- $4.45M/year
Indiana- $5.4M/year (10 years)
Iowa- $4M/year
Better than Minnesota's and Michigan State's deals too. Maryland's deal is with their sugar daddy alumnus.

Please explain how more money than our peer B1G institutions is the "worst" deal in B1G.
Be happy, it's fun!
you know some of those deals were signed almost 10yrs ago right?

this isn't a good deal for a team in a premier conference in the media capital of the world.

RU marketing is abysmal at best and these type deals are the result
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,582
87,552
113
you know some of those deals were signed almost 10yrs ago right?

this isn't a good deal for a team in a premier conference in the media capital of the world.

RU marketing is abysmal at best and these type deals are the result
Recognize that those deals are older.
RU's marketing is not abysmal, as you put it, but it is not anywhere near great. Their branding improved quite a bit in the last 10 years. At least in Newark airport, there are block Rs in the terminals to remind people that Rutgers is the State University of New Jersey.
But the best marketing is to be a blue blood, which Rutgers is not.

The next best marketing is to have a sustained record of winning, and going to the NCAA tournament for men's hoops, and several winning seasons. Rutgers just had its first winning season since 2014 in 2023. Maybe that is why Indiana got a sweet deal from Adidas because of their off the charts year this year.

Michigan State's deal was 2024, and RU's is better even if it is $3M/year.
Don't see Minnesota getting that much more when they get their new deal.

The negative drumbeat of some around here is tiresome. Perhaps people need more realistic expectations and comparisons to true peer institutions.
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
Recognize that those deals are older.
RU's marketing is not abysmal, as you put it, but it is not anywhere near great. Their branding improved quite a bit in the last 10 years. At least in Newark airport, there are block Rs in the terminals to remind people that Rutgers is the State University of New Jersey.
But the best marketing is to be a blue blood, which Rutgers is not.

The next best marketing is to have a sustained record of winning, and going to the NCAA tournament for men's hoops, and several winning seasons. Rutgers just had its first winning season since 2014 in 2023. Maybe that is why Indiana got a sweet deal from Adidas because of their off the charts year this year.

Michigan State's deal was 2024, and RU's is better even if it is $3M/year.
Don't see Minnesota getting that much more when they get their new deal.

The negative drumbeat of some around here is tiresome. Perhaps people need more realistic expectations and comparisons to true peer institutions.
MSU deal was 10 year 34 million before they signed a higher extension.
 

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
6,997
7,783
113
Heard a rumor that Adidas is not supplying all that was promised to our spring sports. Uniform and supply delays? Anyone have any information. Heard last night from a reliable source. Practice uniforms not delivered or not enough and game uniforms in limbo.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Recognize that those deals are older.
RU's marketing is not abysmal, as you put it, but it is not anywhere near great. Their branding improved quite a bit in the last 10 years. At least in Newark airport, there are block Rs in the terminals to remind people that Rutgers is the State University of New Jersey.
But the best marketing is to be a blue blood, which Rutgers is not.

The next best marketing is to have a sustained record of winning, and going to the NCAA tournament for men's hoops, and several winning seasons. Rutgers just had its first winning season since 2014 in 2023. Maybe that is why Indiana got a sweet deal from Adidas because of their off the charts year this year.

Michigan State's deal was 2024, and RU's is better even if it is $3M/year.
Don't see Minnesota getting that much more when they get their new deal.

The negative drumbeat of some around here is tiresome. Perhaps people need more realistic expectations and comparisons to true peer institutions.
I think Salvi has you on this one.

So how much do they pay for the first 5 years.. if they do not extend another 5? Seems like it is back-loaded. I do not like the idea of big promised money for the extension if the vendor has all the control. That is, there is no upside if Rutgers out-performs during teh first 5 years.. the pay rate for teh second 5 years is set in stone. And if Rutgers under-performs, then the vendor can drop us or renegotiate much lower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvi's Headband

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
I think Salvi has you on this one.

So how much do they pay for the first 5 years.. if they do not extend another 5? Seems like it is back-loaded. I do not like the idea of big promised money for the extension if the vendor has all the control. That is, there is no upside if Rutgers out-performs during teh first 5 years.. the pay rate for teh second 5 years is set in stone. And if Rutgers under-performs, then the vendor can drop us or renegotiate much lower.
Also understand that the number is "total value. " We will be paid much less than 3 mil a year.
 

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
6,997
7,783
113
Also understand that the number is "total value. " We will be paid much less than 3 mil a year.
Has anyone seen the contract? I have seen multiple postings. Some saying 5 year 30 million with a 5 year option. Some saying total value 10 year 30 million. The Asbury park article posted above, poorly written and vague, states as you say the 10 year option.

I looked on the Rutgers website and can’t find the contract. It’s odd to post 10 year value when the option hasn’t been triggered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

JerseyNoles

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2021
2,841
2,425
3
Granted we're not a blue blood, but who is signing these deals for us?
Feels like we still have a little league marketing department / Rutgers employees working for us with these numbers I'm seeing
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodOl'Rutgers

Fat Koko

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2022
4,081
3,456
73
Has anyone seen the contract? I have seen multiple postings. Some saying 5 year 30 million with a 5 year option. Some saying total value 10 year 30 million. The Asbury park article posted above, poorly written and vague, states as you say the 10 year option.

I looked on the Rutgers website and can’t find the contract. It’s odd to post 10 year value when the option hasn’t been triggered.
The apparel contract between Rutgers and BSN won’t be posted to the Rutgers website. Reporters are probably filing OPRA requests for this contract. The university will comply with these requests after a contract is fully signed.

The $30 million includes the five-year extension. This is stated clearly the publicly available document I posted to TKR on Wednesday.

This document is the meeting agenda for last Tuesday’s board of governors meeting in which the board voted on several items including approving the apparel deal.

It read in part, “a five- year term, with one optional five-year extension, with a total estimated value of $30 million (inclusive of the extension term)”.

The document doesn’t state how the $30 million will be paid or which party - Rutgers, BSN, or both - owns the option to extend.

Two other tidbits from the document: 1) Rutgers asked 5 apparel providers to submit proposals and only one, BSN, replied, 2) emergency procurement procedures needed to be invoked so Rutgers teams have uniforms for the fall 2025 season.