yeah great. So now they can have TWO refs in a position to throw a bad flag. Coaches should get 1 random challenge to use as needed to address these crappy game changing calls. They also would have to possess the guts to correct the call..which is often a consideration of not wanting to look too bad too often.Just make the play reviewable. Offside on a kick should be pretty damn easy to confirm/overturn on replay.
Plays are overturned on replay all the time. Occasionally the replay official also gets it wrong but it happens a lot less because, you know, they are reviewing the play in slow motion from multiple angles.yeah great. So now they can have TWO refs in a position to throw a bad flag. Coaches should get 1 random challenge to use as needed to address these crappy game changing calls. They also would have to possess the guts to correct the call..which is often a consideration of not wanting to look too bad too often.
If only one change were to be made, I would go with the booth review, which they can slow it down and give it a good lookPlays are overturned on replay all the time. Occasionally the replay official also gets it wrong but it happens a lot less because, you know, they are reviewing the play in slow motion from multiple angles.
How many times have we seen the official review of a play be controversial as well? Bias rears its ugly head far too often.Just make the play reviewable. Offside on a kick should be pretty damn easy to confirm/overturn on replay.
ASU?Is my memory correct- didn’t RU have an offside penalty years ago against Alabama that negated recovery
Sure, bias will always be there, but isn’t the point to attempt to remove all bias to the extent possible? And wouldn’t the best way to do that in this specific case to just make the play reviewable? We have a camera angle looking right at the line of scrimmage and as video review goes, offside is about as black and white as you can get? Makes a lot more sense than saying “I know, let’s reposition the on-field refs so they can still get the call wrong.”How many times have we seen the official review of a play be controversial as well? Bias rears its ugly head far too often.
@fluoxetine had similar comment but did not account for purposeful errors.. bias.. it seems to happen in live calls on the field, officials' huddles to decide what the "on-field call" will be.. and even in the official reviews.. and in the NFL.. we even see it in directions coming from the league office in New York.
I’ve seen bad video review calls but the vast majority of the time they seem to get it right. There’s only so many “purposeful errors” you can make when the play is being shown 20 times from 5 different angles to everyone watching on TV.How many times have we seen the official review of a play be controversial as well? Bias rears its ugly head far too often.
@fluoxetine had similar comment but did not account for purposeful errors.. bias.. it seems to happen in live calls on the field, officials' huddles to decide what the "on-field call" will be.. and even in the official reviews.. and in the NFL.. we even see it in directions coming from the league office in New York.
Targeting is much more subjective than offside, especially when you have a camera right on the LOS.reviews are great- look how good they were on those targeting plays...just saying
I get it but have seen more than a few goalie sideline calls missed by replay tooTargeting is much more subjective than offside, especially when you have a camera right on the LOS.
If the offensive team makes a substitution the defense is allowed to substitute, if the offense makes a late substitution they risk a delay of game since the defense can substitute & doesn’t have to be in a rushOn a different note, they have to modify the situation that allows the referee to hold up play to allow for substitution and leaving the field. The problem is that the play clock is not stopped. I think Rutgers used that to its advantage in the Virginia Tech game by taking a late, slow jog to the sideline while V-Tech's play clock expired. That was smart on Rutgers part but overall it is not very fair to the team ready to snap the ball to have that happen.
it was the exact opposite. Rutgers was on offense and Va Tech slow-jogged...forcing Greg to have to call time out. BTW, we all know how quickly the league came out to address the Ohio State basketball game for us right (haha).On a different note, they have to modify the situation that allows the referee to hold up play to allow for substitution and leaving the field. The problem is that the play clock is not stopped. I think Rutgers used that to its advantage in the Virginia Tech game by taking a late, slow jog to the sideline while V-Tech's play clock expired. That was smart on Rutgers part but overall it is not very fair to the team ready to snap the ball to have that happen.
Rutgers goes off the field slowly on these plays every time. It’s good coaching given a poor rule.it was the exact opposite. Rutgers was on offense and Va Tech slow-jogged...forcing Greg to have to call time out. BTW, we all know how quickly the league came out to address the Ohio State basketball game for us right (haha).
I forget which game it was but RU did get called for offsides on an onside kick and I believe they called the kicker offsides.Is my memory correct- didn’t RU have an offside penalty years ago against Alabama that negated recovery
Arizona StateI forget which game it was but RU did get called for offsides on an onside kick and I believe they called the kicker offsides.
And yet, still it seems to happen.I’ve seen bad video review calls but the vast majority of the time they seem to get it right. There’s only so many “purposeful errors” you can make when the play is being shown 20 times from 5 different angles to everyone watching on TV.
YES.. there should be time limits when both the offense can sub and when teh defense can sub. The play clock is 45 seconds.. give them 15 seconds to initiate substitution and, outside a 2-minute WARNING of each half prevent the offense from snapping the ball for those first 15 seconds.. giving the D 15 seconds to sub in if it wants to.On a different note, they have to modify the situation that allows the referee to hold up play to allow for substitution and leaving the field. The problem is that the play clock is not stopped. I think Rutgers used that to its advantage in the Virginia Tech game by taking a late, slow jog to the sideline while V-Tech's play clock expired. That was smart on Rutgers part but overall it is not very fair to the team ready to snap the ball to have that happen.
who said anything about the coaching?Rutgers goes off the field slowly on these plays every time. It’s good coaching given a poor rule.
Duh, they are coached to do that.who said anything about the coaching?
yeah and we're discussing the RULE not the coaching strategy. Duh.Duh, they are coached to do that.