RU #41 in the latest Athletic poll

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,538
87,505
113
VT still throws me off. Their QB did get better as the season went on but even when he was playing well- did they really beat anyone with a pulse?
We shall find out. Their first 3 games are against Vanderbilt, Marshall and Old Dominion. May not know that much from those three games, but neither will we know much about Rutgers, unless VT or Rutgers has a difficult time with one of their early opponents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spanky Da Soviet

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
49,553
60,895
113
  • Haha
Reactions: Spanky Da Soviet

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,538
87,505
113

Extra Point_rivals157299

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2001
13,166
4,692
0
Based purely on this ranking list, Rutgers gets 7 wins, ie 7 teams we play have a lower ranking than us. But we all know about these pre season ranking lists. They aren't all that accurate.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,538
87,505
113
Based purely on this ranking list, Rutgers gets 7 wins, ie 7 teams we play have a lower ranking than us. But we all know about these pre season ranking lists. They aren't all that accurate.
Just a rough rule of thumb-usually the rankings below the top 10-15, in the 16 to 60 or 70 range are difficult to predict.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,339
92,259
103
41 is a positive number.
We have to prove we can move the ball in crunch time in close games.,,,and stop a team that’s multi-dimensional.
I’ll put GS up against anyone to shut one phase down, shutting both run and pass down has been an issue.

PS.
Tight, close games, I’m figuring the opponent to be of quality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thegock

RUinBoston

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2006
1,409
1,051
63
VT still throws me off. Their QB did get better as the season went on but even when he was playing well- did they really beat anyone with a pulse?
Preseason polls always have a certain amount of reversion to historical mean.