Ogbole debut vs. Indiana?

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,333
15,181
113
Mawot Mag, Austin Williams, and Emmanuel Ogbole were listed as questionable for the Iowa game. Mag and Williams ended up being the top two Scarlet Knights on the court against the Hawkeyes.

I may be in minority, but I think Ogbole could be a key to salvaging this season. I don't care if he scores a point. Simply having a big body to set screens, blocking out, and hammering opponents when they come into the paint would provide a big lift for RU.

The number of ticky-tack hand-foul "and 1s" we allowed at Iowa was embarrassing. Fouling opponents with the intention of letting them know "no easy baskets for you" would help immensely.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
11,009
8,559
113
Mawot Mag, Austin Williams, and Emmanuel Ogbole were listed as questionable for the Iowa game. Mag and Williams ended up being the top two Scarlet Knights on the court against the Hawkeyes.

I may be in minority, but I think Ogbole could be a key to salvaging this season. I don't care if he scores a point. Simply having a big body to set screens, blocking out, and hammering opponents when they come into the paint would provide a big lift for RU.

The number of ticky-tack hand fouls "and 1s" we allowed at Iowa was embarrassing. Fouling opponents with the intention of letting them know "no easy baskets for you" would help immensely.
We need another big body on the boards!!
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,080
15,467
72
Mawot Mag, Austin Williams, and Emmanuel Ogbole were listed as questionable for the Iowa game. Mag and Williams ended up being the top two Scarlet Knights on the court against the Hawkeyes.

I may be in minority, but I think Ogbole could be a key to salvaging this season. I don't care if he scores a point. Simply having a big body to set screens, blocking out, and hammering opponents when they come into the paint would provide a big lift for RU.

The number of ticky-tack hand fouls "and 1s" we allowed at Iowa was embarrassing. Fouling opponents with the intention of letting them know "no easy baskets for you" would help immensely.
I agree, and have been making similar comments on here, that he has to help, if only a little. You and I (and some others) are not saying he’s a savior, just a big dude who can contribute with a few rebounds, a couple of altered or blocked shots, and up to five fouls. If he scores at all it’s a bonus. I’m anxious to see what he can do for us.
 

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,333
15,181
113
Agree. Valuable role as a rim protector shot blocker rebounder inside physical presence

Wouldn't mind seeing Ogbole in and committing a hard clean foul in a game we are getting beat up inside
Unfortunately, that's been the case in too many games this season.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Scangg

RAC93

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2023
3,013
4,940
113
Wolf hasn't been bringing that football physicality inside
Wolf has not been good as far as hitting the boards and interior D. When Ogbole is eventually ready they should give him some of Wolf’s minutes and if he shows much of anything then make him the backup for rest of season. Let’s get a looksie at this guy and see what we have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
69% fg - looks good (how many were dunks?)
49% ft - looks bad (same as Cliff and Wolf)
Can't hurt to give him some minutes if he is physically ready.
That is against community colleges. We are screwed if we think this is any answer to our problems.

What were Luke Nathan’s numbers playing in the Iron Hill Conference. Probably went 26-10 against Par Hills.
 

Freddy Stubbs

Junior
Oct 25, 2008
376
398
63
That is against community colleges. We are screwed if we think this is any answer to our problems.

What were Luke Nathan’s numbers playing in the Iron Hill Conference. Probably went 26-10 against Par Hills.
I wasn't trying to say he is the answer to our problems. Just noting his good fg percentage as reason to hope he could be better than Wolf if that 69% was not made up mostly of dunks.
Also noting that his free throw % is just as crappy as cliff and wolf so why not give the kid a shot.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I wasn't trying to say he is the answer to our problems. Just noting his good fg percentage as reason to hope he could be better than Wolf if that 69% was not made up mostly of dunks.
Also noting that his free throw % is just as crappy as cliff and wolf so why not give the kid a shot.
Maybe we should give me a shot. I am pretty confident in most situations Woolfolk is the better option. He knows how to defend with the high screen and he has skills.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,456
177,157
113
They should have made Gavin put on 10 lbs of muscle.

Did the staff
A. not tell him OR
B. Gavin just didn't gain muscle
in fairness he is coming from high school

what is Dereks excuse

I think our strength and conditioning program blows
 

Lawboy12007

Senior
Mar 15, 2021
622
837
0
Ogbole has a sculpted body and has bulging muscles. Unfortunately Cliff is not as muscular or as big. Cliff took a large jump during the last two years but has leveled off or regressed. He still hangs onto the ball in the pivot way too long which allows for double and triple teams. He has to find the open team mate and give up the rock.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,080
15,467
72
That is against community colleges. We are screwed if we think this is any answer to our problems.

What were Luke Nathan’s numbers playing in the Iron Hill Conference. Probably went 26-10 against Par Hills.
Here’s a highlight video of Ogbole’s freshman season at Monroe College, where he averaged 12 and 8 with 2 blocks per game. Shows some good fundamentals of keeping the ball high and using the glass:


PS: Luke’s senior year at Randolph High, he averaged 13 points and 1 rebound per game. Against Parsippany Hills he had 9 points and 0 rebounds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skull83 and Scangg

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Ogbole has a sculpted body and has bulging muscles. Unfortunately Cliff is not as muscular or as big. Cliff took a large jump during the last two years but has leveled off or regressed. He still hangs onto the ball in the pivot way too long which allows for double and triple teams. He has to find the open team mate and give up the rock.
Absolutely correct… watch any high ranked B1G around college basketball. They’ll kick it out if no shot exists… Cliff rarely does that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletDave

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Here’s a highlight video of Ogbole’s freshman season at Monroe College, where he averaged 12 and 8 with 2 blocks per game. Shows some good fundamentals of keeping the ball high and using the glass:


PS: Luke’s senior year at Randolph High, he averaged 13 points and 1 rebound per game. Against Parsippany Hills he had 9 points and 0 rebounds.

I don't ever remember playing Randolph. They were in the other division 30 years ago.

Most school don't report rebounds. I am sure Nathan would have averaged 10+.

Gil St. Bernard did report stats. Only team I have ever seen score 30 FGs and have 35 assists. I am very confident Paul really didn't average a triple double in HS.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,080
15,467
72
I don't ever remember playing Randolph. They were in the other division 30 years ago.

Most school don't report rebounds. I am sure Nathan would have averaged 10+.

Gil St. Bernard did report stats. Only team I have ever seen score 30 FGs and have 35 assists. I am very confident Paul really didn't average a triple double in HS.
That would explain the low rebound numbers, but he did only have 9 points against Par Hills, not nearly the 26 you projected. But forget that. Take a look at Ogbole’s highlight video. He shows a drop step and a soft touch around the rim, keeping the ball high and using the backboard with regularity, all qualities that Cliff lacks in his offensive game. He even brings the ball up court in one sequence, similar to what we’ve seen from Woolf.
 
Last edited:

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,333
15,181
113
I don't ever remember playing Randolph. They were in the other division 30 years ago.

Most school don't report rebounds. I am sure Nathan would have averaged 10+.

Gil St. Bernard did report stats. Only team I have ever seen score 30 FGs and have 35 assists. I am very confident Paul really didn't average a triple double in HS.
Gotta take into account those hockey assists!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
That is against community colleges. We are screwed if we think this is any answer to our problems.

What were Luke Nathan’s numbers playing in the Iron Hill Conference. Probably went 26-10 against Par Hills.
No one thinks he's some superstar. He is the biggest strongest player on the team by far with a massive wingspan

You don't think he can give a few minutes to rebound, protect the rim, add physicality, and dunk?
 
Last edited:

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
He shot 69% and I assume most if not all of his shots were at the rim. I like his drop step and use of the glass. Seems to have a soft touch for a big man.
He's definitely raw but he seems to be taking to coaching well if you watch what he does around the rim. Keeps the ball high. Uses drop steps. Uses the glass. His touch is better than one would assume
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,080
15,467
72
He's definitely raw but he seems to be taking to coaching well if you watch what he does around the rim. Keeps the ball high. Uses drop steps. Uses the glass. His touch is better than one would assume
Exactly. I think we agree he’s no savior but it appears he may be able to help us. Only one way to find out.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
74,993
91,784
103
No one thinks he's some superstar. He is the biggest strongest player on the team by far with a massive wingspan

You don't think he can give a few minutes to rebound, protect the rim, add physicality, and dunk?
No one knows, but “get him out now” is a very popular phrase around here and not because we like saying it.
You see what’s happening to Gavin when facing D1 gifted athletes, for the non extraordinary, the speed and physicality is eye opening at first and requires an enormous adjustment to contribute.
He’s been questionable, not out for several games now, why isn’t he getting even a small run
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
No one knows, but “get him out now” is a very popular phrase around here and not because we like saying it.
You see what’s happening to Gavin when facing D1 gifted athletes, for the non extraordinary, the speed and physicality is eye opening at first and requires an enormous adjustment to contribute.
He’s been questionable, not out for several games now, why isn’t he getting even a small run
Speed, yes for sure. Physicality yes, for Gavin

Ogbole is a physical freak. He is a monster. The argument to give him a few minutes is bc of his physicality. If he can't handle the physicality, let's find out this year bc there is no point in keeping him around if he can't. That's what he hypothetically brings to the table
 
  • Like
Reactions: PiscatawayMike

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
74,993
91,784
103
Speed, yes for sure. Physicality yes, for Gavin

Ogbole is a physical freak. He is a monster. The argument to give him a few minutes is bc of his physicality. If he can't handle the physicality, let's find out this year bc there is no point in keeping him around if he can't. That's what he hypothetically brings to the table
Your forgetting the skill, coordination and savvy that goes along with physicality
 
  • Love
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG