I feel for Wimsatt. He is a very young kid with obvious talent that needs further development. The same can be said for virtually every other quarterback in their first year in college ball. Maybe the 5-stars do better but all need development. Then there is the issue of not having much of a team around him and receivers that drop passes and/or don't get themselves open. Add the pressure that he must feel and it's a bad situation for the kid.
I can say with reasonable certainty that Rutgers will not attract a better solution than what they have in Wimsatt. The kid needs and deserves good coaching in the offseason. Schiano should find and hire an experienced, high-level quarterback to develop the kid.
The team doesn't have a better option now and expecting a good quarterback to transfer in is overly optimistic. At some point, they have to develop the talent they have and stop looking for saviors to magically appear. To a different degree, the same holds true for the head coach. Think about it. I'm no Schiano fan but you have to consider who would replace him. What capable and experienced coach would come? Then the rebuilding starts all over again. I've been watching this for 38 years, since Anderson was hired. Every hire has been someone else's assistant coach. I have no reason to believe Rutgers would hire an experienced and proven head coach. Today, I can't imagine why any high-caliber kid would want to come to Rutgers, whether Schiano is there or a new unproven coach replaces him. The chicken or the egg dilemma remains.