So back to an old topic..

csphi

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
17,803
20,042
102
Now that the season is over, I think it’s clear Pikiell pulled the wool over Hobbs eyes. An extension through 2030 is long and undeserving. Pikiell may be at his peak. I hope I am wrong, but just not seeing enough talent on team or pipeline to get back to tournament in near future.
“Pulled the wool over his eyes”

Do you people actually think before you post stupid **** like this

WTF
 

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,147
10,667
82
Honestly, this year really wasnt that much fun for me. There were some great moments but lots of extremely disappointing moments as well. One problem is just making the tourney isn't the goal anymore. Its to have some success. Going out in both tournaments this year after 1 game is just a punch in
the gut. With the terrible start to the season, so much of the season just felt like blown opportunities.
I think it’s time you take a hiatus from rooting for RU bball. If this was gut wrenching, what did you do between 1990 and 2019
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,632
10,758
78
We need more talent. Period. This whole under-recruited crap gets you what we saw tonight. Unable to get any stops. Unable to be real threats from deep. Too easy to play against us on offense and defense.
Its just maddening.
Wrong, no, you’re just upset they lost and not making sense. Pike will rebuild and will complete like always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRA10Thunderbolt

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,632
10,758
78
Now that the season is over, Hobbs could have waited to now and given Pikiell 5 years rather than through end of decade. This seems like the Ash extension after Ash flirted with some small success, but is was becoming clear the talent level coming in was not good enough. An extension through 2030 is long and possbly premature. Could it be Pikiell may be at his peak? hope not, but unless talent on team takes a huge jump or pipeline to talent improves it will take a couple of years to get back to tournament. This off-season is critical for Him to bring in new blood. Can he build on his recent success, new facilities and contract? TBD. But, at least he can set expectations better next season.

(edited after cooling down)
Stop. Pike is an incredible coach. 3 years in a row with very good teams. Next year is going to be interesting but I fully trust he has built the program for the long haul. Your expectations (and a few others) are completely out of wack. Pike is going to get his teams to the tournament and compete. It doesn’t get much better than that.
 
Last edited:

Jersey383

Senior
Jan 8, 2015
480
553
0
Everyone is enamored by how many stars a kid has. I believe I was listening to JJ Reddick on his podcast and he mentioned that after the top 20 kids in the country there's a drop off and it really doesn't matter where you're ranked. I got news for you guys unless you're a bluebird program you aren't getting top kids year in a year out. We will get our fair share of 4 stars I believe pike got 6 since he's been here. It's about coaching up the players you get. Everyone forgets a lot of the time you get your freshman playing time early in the nonconference season. Last year we barely had that. There was a major development hit with covid. Pike is fine he develops his players and gets them to play the style of play he wants. He got out coached he will tell you the same thing. He will learn from this just like the players who are coming back. **** the stars give me dudes who have something to prove.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,632
10,758
78
Im actually okay with a step back...I dont think RU is at the stage where we are a ncaa tourney every year. I expect a 13-18/14-17 season, the rac will be sold out based on this season but really its not going to be the same....and I am probably okay with a 2nd season not getting to the tourney as we really reload and then my expectations are that you have to get back in that tourney in 2025.

if there ever was a season to schedule poorly, its next.
That’s a fair assessment and yes it would be understandable for a step back next year. I do think if Pike can find someone (Maybe 2) in the portal, RU can complete at a similar level (18 wins). They would definitely need to get someone to put up points similar to Geo or Ron and then have the rest of the team pick up their game. Pike knows how to coach and I fully expect him to figure it out.
 

anon1753890747

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
3,891
3,679
72
We need more talent. Period. This whole under-recruited crap gets you what we saw tonight. Unable to get any stops. Unable to be real threats from deep. Too easy to play against us on offense and defense.
Its just maddening.
We need a pure shooter
And some who can create his own shot
Kind of like what St Peter’s has
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,632
10,758
78
We need more talent. Period. This whole under-recruited crap gets you what we saw tonight. Unable to get any stops. Unable to be real threats from deep. Too easy to play against us on offense and defense.
Its just maddening.
Hit 11 threes last night. Did you watch the game? The defense did not figure it out last night but defense has been a strength for three years. Come on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,656
86,657
113
Now that the season is over, Hobbs could have waited to now and given Pikiell 5 years rather than through end of decade. This seems like the Ash extension after Ash flirted with some small success, but is was becoming clear the talent level coming in was not good enough. An extension through 2030 is long and possbly premature. Could it be Pikiell may be at his peak? hope not, but unless talent on team takes a huge jump or pipeline to talent improves it will take a couple of years to get back to tournament. This off-season is critical for Him to bring in new blood. Can he build on his recent success, new facilities and contract? TBD. But, at least he can set expectations better next season.

(edited after cooling down)
Not even remotely similar. There were contractual reasons for giving the Ash extension due to the sanctions. Like or not, that was in his contract/MOU that he and RU signed when he was hired.

Also, are you really comparing Ash's "success" with Pikiell's? Speechless on this point, as it is not even close.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,632
10,758
78
Not even remotely similar. There were contractual reasons for giving the Ash extension due to the sanctions. Like or not, that was in his contract/MOU that he and RU signed when he was hired.

Also, are you really comparing Ash's "success" with Pikiell's? Speechless on this point, as it is not even close.
Speechless is a very good way to describe it. Dumbfounded, flabbergasted or befuddled may also work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh and Scangg

Jersey383

Senior
Jan 8, 2015
480
553
0
Now that the season is over, Hobbs could have waited to now and given Pikiell 5 years rather than through end of decade. This seems like the Ash extension after Ash flirted with some small success, but is was becoming clear the talent level coming in was not good enough. An extension through 2030 is long and possbly premature. Could it be Pikiell may be at his peak? hope not, but unless talent on team takes a huge jump or pipeline to talent improves it will take a couple of years to get back to tournament. This off-season is critical for Him to bring in new blood. Can he build on his recent success, new facilities and contract? TBD. But, at least he can set expectations better next season.

(edited after cooling down)
You're kidding right?! Ash claim to fame was winning a career high 4 games in 1 season.... pike has got us to the tourney 3 years in a row! Buddy do yourself a favor a delete your account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

Jersey383

Senior
Jan 8, 2015
480
553
0
Pike needs to sit down with Jones now,& let him know that he will play a big role next year.Nothing can be done if that bridge has already been burned.
Why does everyone think there is any tension between these two? Honestly he was an early enrollment and his "freshman" year was lat year where we played maybe what 4 ooc games? This year was his actual freshman year. Pike tried bring the young guys along bit he also has a job to win games. Jones will be fine relax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and sct1111

FIJI'83

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2008
3,169
3,739
66
Hit 11 threes last night. Did you watch the game? The defense did not figure it out last night but defense has been a strength for three years. Come on.
You realize 9 of those 11 3s are graduating right? I think the OP is saying that we absolutely need to add multiple scoring threats in the portal for this team to be competitive next year and that's being not be negative at all its the truth. Are there people that really think this team can compete with the current roster next year?
 

RU85inFla

Heisman
Aug 4, 2003
15,554
10,524
73
As we have seen this team only went 5 deep in crunch time. We need 3 starters and 3-4 others to step up big. Can Jaden, Miller, Dean, Hyatt, Mag improve significantly? If so we can find 4 role players out of that bunch if they do but I do not see any 30 min starters from that group.

I think to move forward we need 3 portal guys with 3 schollys available at most. I think that’s more change than pikes interested in. I’m less concerned about finding guys in the portal and more concerned with Pike betting on his current bench to develop like Geo or Ron.
 

FIJI'83

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2008
3,169
3,739
66
As we have seen this team only went 5 deep in crunch time. We need 3 starters and 3-4 others to step up big. Can Jaden, Miller, Dean, Hyatt, Mag improve significantly? If so we can find 4 role players out of that bunch if they do but I do not see any 30 min starters from that group.

I think to move forward we need 3 portal guys with 3 schollys available at most. I think that’s more change than pikes interested in. I’m less concerned about finding guys in the portal and more concerned with Pike betting on his current bench to develop like Geo or Ron.
I think a few of the guys you mentioned can improve but Hyatt in particular I would shocked if he improved his game on any significant level the kid is just not anywhere close to a Big Ten level player
 

Jersey383

Senior
Jan 8, 2015
480
553
0
As we have seen this team only went 5 deep in crunch time. We need 3 starters and 3-4 others to step up big. Can Jaden, Miller, Dean, Hyatt, Mag improve significantly? If so we can find 4 role players out of that bunch if they do but I do not see any 30 min starters from that group.

I think to move forward we need 3 portal guys with 3 schollys available at most. I think that’s more change than pikes interested in. I’m less concerned about finding guys in the portal and more concerned with Pike betting on his current bench to develop like Geo or Ron.
In a winner go home game who do you want on the floor in crunch time?
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
I think a few of the guys you mentioned can improve but Hyatt in particular I would shocked if he improved his game on any significant level the kid is just not anywhere close to a Big Ten level player
Hyatt has a lot of potential. Maybe he doesn't put it together, but if he does, it shouldn't be a shock. He is the likely favorite to start at the 4 next year if we don't bring in a starting caliber 4. The opportunity is there for Hyatt to take
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRA10Thunderbolt

jerzeyguy

All-Conference
May 18, 2008
3,517
2,600
0
The players on the bench weren't even good enough to give us 10 quality minutes a game and these are the same players that you all are claiming will develop (in jus a few months) and become quality starters next yr. Recruiting has been bad, and most on here really don't realize it. Watching Rutgers next year when Rieber, Mag, Hyatt - are all playing 25+ mins a night.. 🤦‍♂️
 
A

anon_ivydyf0amkzay

Guest
For a fan base of a program that was dead dead dead not that long ago, we sure act entitled sometimes. It’s not like we have the history or a KU or UK or UCLA
 
  • Like
Reactions: krup

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
For a fan base of a program that was dead dead dead not that long ago, we sure act entitled sometimes. It’s not like we have the history or a KU or UK or UCLA
It is amazing how people forget.

I was thinking the same thing when I saw that most Cleveland Browns fans are down on Baker Mayfield and want him replaced. I get the idea of trying to get your team to take the "next step", but these Browns fans have already forgotten that Mayfield has led them to 12 wins in their division in the same number of years his predecessors led them to 3.
 

Pancho1939_rivals

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2012
1,887
2,907
113
We need more talent. Period. This whole under-recruited crap gets you what we saw tonight. Unable to get any stops. Unable to be real threats from deep. Too easy to play against us on offense and defense.
Its just maddening

do you think kentucky has to many 5 stars?
You guys stop pretending we are still rutgers. We need to fin unconventional ways to win until the 5 stars want to come.

A lot of people on the board wanted Danny Hurley and low and behold hurley gets bounced in first round by a 12 seed.

what you guys fail to get is you can’t find three coaches who consistently get to the sweet sixteen let alone a final four. Final fours are a lifetime achievement for a lot of coaches.

Based on rutgers entire basketball history making the ncaa consistently is the goal right now. One ncaa doesn’t erase that we are still rutgers
 
Last edited:

RU-AGK

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2001
5,548
1,994
0
do you think kentucky has to many 5 stars?
You guys stop pretending we are still rutgers. We need to fin unconventional ways to win until the 5 stars want to come.

A lot of people on the board wanted Danny Hurley and low and behold hurley gets bounced in first round by a 12 seed.

what you guys fail to get is you can’t find three coaches who consistently get to the sweet sixteen let alone a final four. Final fours are a lifetime achievement for a lot of coaches.

Based on rutgers entire basketball history making the ncaa consistently is the goal right now. One ncaa doesn’t erase that we are still rutgers
The opinions of guys who wanted anything to do with any Hurley should be dismissed out of hand.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Local Shill

RU85inFla

Heisman
Aug 4, 2003
15,554
10,524
73
In a winner go home game who do you want on the floor in crunch time?
You are not suggesting it’s commonplace to play only 5 guys for the last 15 mins of a winner take all game. Plenty of games on this weekend. Take a look.

pike having to lean so hard on those guys is a clear indication of what he believes the talent level of the bench is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Shill

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Hey people who know about Pike's contract.

Why was it renegotiated and extended now? Does that happen every year or was it "due"?

Who instigated this contract.. was it Pike? Was he getting offers?

Here's my negative thought (and it is very likely unwarranted speculation) .. if it was Pike's people pushing for this... could it have been based on his looking ahead and seeing the recruiting pipeline looking questionable and knowing his team of super seniors was the best he'll have for awhile so negotiate from strength now rather than risk negotiating off whatever we do in the next two years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Shill

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,516
7,327
113
I hope making the tournament as a 10 seed and winning a game and then as an 11 seed in a play-in game is not going to be the peak of Steve's time here. Anyone who isn't a bit concerned about the future is delusional or lying. I mean, even Bob freaking Wenzel made the tournament twice in 3 years.

Now, I think Pikiell is a far less lazy, a better program builder and coach (but in a way better league) so I don't think we'll go in the tank like Bob did for his last six years but there's reason to have plenty of questions about the future.

In the next 3 to 4 seasons, do folks see us having a 23-8/22-9 type year where we're comfortably in the tourney as a top 6 seed? I'm not sure I do.
 

RedChucken123

Senior
Oct 21, 2015
487
565
88
I would hope Pike would be able to recruit this off-season. Probably was tough to recruit when you have 5 sure fire starters coming back. This year with 3 starters possibly leaving, there’s minutes available. And though hopefully our current bench guys take a step up, I don’t think any recruits can possibly tell at what level they’re at.

Pike is building a foundation. All of our current guys are flawed in some way, but showing that he can develop was the first phase. Now hopefully the even higher rated recruits can see that and understand that and our potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bethlehemfan

RU85inFla

Heisman
Aug 4, 2003
15,554
10,524
73
Hey people who know about Pike's contract.

Why was it renegotiated and extended now? Does that happen every year or was it "due"?

Who instigated this contract.. was it Pike? Was he getting offers?

Here's my negative thought (and it is very likely unwarranted speculation) .. if it was Pike's people pushing for this... could it have been based on his looking ahead and seeing the recruiting pipeline looking questionable and knowing his team of super seniors was the best he'll have for awhile so negotiate from strength now rather than risk negotiating off whatever we do in the next two years?
If you listen to the podcast the guys on the site did with Hobbs you will hear that it was somewhat preemptive because other schools were looking at him.

I believe the AD's at those schools were not as concerned about Pike's recruiting as the average fan on this site.
 

Jersey383

Senior
Jan 8, 2015
480
553
0
You are not suggesting it’s commonplace to play only 5 guys for the last 15 mins of a winner take all game. Plenty of games on this weekend. Take a look.

pike having to lean so hard on those guys is a clear indication of what he believes the talent level of the bench is.
I hear you. But I still think having the covid year last year really stunted a lot of our young guys growth. Barely any OOC games for them to develop in. Our bench is ridiculously young.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,304
12,626
78
Not even remotely similar. There were contractual reasons for giving the Ash extension due to the sanctions. Like or not, that was in his contract/MOU that he and RU signed when he was hired.

Also, are you really comparing Ash's "success" with Pikiell's? Speechless on this point, as it is not even close.
Laughable. First of all - we still completely stunk at the time Ash was extended. We won a total of 4 games (same number as the guy he replaced won the year he was fired).

And more importantly - Ash took over a program that was only one season removed from an 8-5 finish with a bowl victory over UNC. Forget breaking a 30 year NCAA drought - let’s go apples to apples here. RU hadn’t finished with a 500 record and made a post season in 11 years when Pike came in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Shill

patk89

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
6,320
2,447
78
In the next 3 to 4 seasons, do folks see us having a 23-8/22-9 type year where we're comfortably in the tourney as a top 6 seed? I'm not sure I do.
Playing in the B1G makes that type of record extremely hard to achieve. Let's assume 2 losses out of conference. To get to 23-8, you are asking for 14-6 in conference. Challenging for the conference title. Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, Wisconsin, and Michigan State are all regular NCAA teams. Next 3 or 4 years? Maryland will be back. Indiana seems on the right track. Iowa is always tough. No one hands you B1G wins. It's a tough league.
 

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,882
6,713
113
You're kidding right?! Ash claim to fame was winning a career high 4 games in 1 season.... pike has got us to the tourney 3 years in a row! Buddy do yourself a favor a delete your account
Feel free to ignore. Couldn't care less. Not going anywhere.
 
Last edited:

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,882
6,713
113
Not even remotely similar. There were contractual reasons for giving the Ash extension due to the sanctions. Like or not, that was in his contract/MOU that he and RU signed when he was hired.

Also, are you really comparing Ash's "success" with Pikiell's? Speechless on this point, as it is not even close.
The comparison to Ash was "success" of getting 4 wins. In retrospect that was crazy, but at the time it was because the program seemed to be ready to turn it around. I agree Pikiell is way ahead and has shown success that Ash never did so also agree comparison is not a good one by me (the hazards of a pre-March Madness and Coronas).

That said, I think the extension is very generous. Why not a standard 5 year extension right now rather than go out 8 years (through 2030). The team was inconsistent this year with some spectacular wins and some beyond head scratching loses despite Pikiell's own assessment of being his best team ever. Inconsistency in recruiting is another issue. Recent strong additions of Cliff and Paul are great but he also has a lot of diamonds in the rough that take time to develop and may not develop or stick around long enough after development given the portal environment. This portal offseason will be critical for him.