Toggle sidebar

Draw your own conclusion

Z

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,011
91,798
103
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: thegock, RU-ROCS, Good-Knight_rivals375869 and 13 others
R

RUwishbone

Sophomore
Nov 13, 2007
1,215
150
63
Just another observation, the fact is that play was not executed. We survived it just did not advance
 
P

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,304
12,626
78
Yes we did. For all the good Pike has brought crapping out on important inbounds plays is officially a recurring issue. That Stonybrook nightmare keeps on haunting.
 
M

Miggins

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
1,666
2,581
112
I am not an X and O basketball expert, but when the started lining up I was saying "What the F, they are doing the same stupid play they did against Penn State".

Would think you just have the 4 guys line up and break off in different directions, simple but effective......
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUonBrain, DHajekRC84, QD43 and 3 others
Z

Zimm80

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,909
1,207
0
zappaa said:
Great hall of fame coaches make mistakes.
Pike is an excellent coach who made a mistake given the fouling situation
Click to expand...
Definitely great coaches make mistakes, it happens all the time , and coach Pike is definitely a good coach but not an excellent coach outside the RAC , he needs to be to get the big time recruits to call RU home.
 
B

bethlehemfan

Heisman
Sep 6, 2003
15,110
16,395
113
zappaa said:
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup.
Click to expand...
It was a poor design poorly executed imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GORU2014
Captain Hogleg

Captain Hogleg

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2006
3,133
4,229
68
Was a very poor inbounds play in my humble opinion. St Peters ran a far superior inbound play in their end of game scenario. Further, St Peters correctly applied soft pressure on the Kentucky inbound while SP had the narrow lead. Two areas I feel Pike and the coaches failed to implement the proper tactic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motorb54, Newbrunfus and biker7766
R

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
11,022
8,580
113
zappaa said:
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup.
Click to expand...
Problem is we have no inbounds plays and we ran the same stupid play where we couldn't get the ball in bounds against Penn State
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virginiarufan and biker7766
C

ColonelRutgers

All-American
Dec 15, 2003
7,103
9,293
113
I don’t know anything about the play design. All I know is I did not want Paul to be the inbounder. I felt the same way BEFORE the Penn State turnover which was bad but was also a much more difficult play than the ND one. Paul had been a shaky inbounder way before Penn State. Yes he then came down and nailed a three but it was still a devastating turnover.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac, Virginiarufan and GORU2014
Z

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,011
91,798
103
ColonelRutgers said:
I don’t know anything about the play design. All I know is I did not want Paul to be the inbounder. I felt the same way BEFORE the Penn State turnover which was bad but was also a much more difficult play than the ND one. Paul had been a shaky inbounder way before Penn State. Yes he then came down and nailed a three but it was still a devastating turnover.
Click to expand...
The point of the thread is it’ wasn’t Paul’s fault.
Give him a couple options and he’ll find one with no problem
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus, Unionst, ChasRC69 and 1 other person
Knight Shift

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,659
86,657
113
fluoxetine said:
My least favorite part about that play was the part where we threw it to the other team. It made me sad.
Click to expand...
The inbound play was named "the element of surprise inbound." The problem is Notre Dame was not surprised. Better luck next time.
 
R

RU Husky

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2011
4,890
2,161
0
When it came to not handling the in-bounds play, I thought Gary Waters was the all time worst. Pike is now in contention.
 
T

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,717
19,796
61
I’m a moron with bball Xs and Os.

You don’t need to be a basketball genius or Rutgers HOF to see that was a brain dead inbounds play, and it’s been a consistent issue.

Just my $0.02
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac and DHajekRC84
K

Kbee3

Heisman
Aug 23, 2002
43,724
35,255
0
zappaa said:
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup.
Click to expand...
Paul should have called timeout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus
R

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,829
9,232
113
zappaa said:
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup.
Click to expand...
Any specifics?
 
Z

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
Paul’s share of the blame is that he should have taken a TO. But that blame is far short of the coaching staff who for the life of them cannot come up with an inbounding play. Really it’s hard to understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus, bac2therac and Rufaninga
Z

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
zebnatto said:
Paul’s share of the blame is that he should have taken a TO. But that blame is far short of the coaching staff who for the life of them cannot come up with an inbounding play. Really it’s hard to understand.
Click to expand...
bethlehemfan said:
He had a couple of guys open zap and I believe he had a timeout. So bad design yes I wasn’t thrilled but our guys kind of blew it.
Click to expand...
Who were the open guys? Caleb or Hyatt? And where were they on the court?
 
L

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
15,233
11,049
113
zappaa said:
I guess Avery likes the in-bounder to have no one to throw the ball to
Click to expand...
I think his comment was that it have options and made it harder on the defense. Suggests it may have been an execution problem more than a design problem. Or a bad design for our personnel.
 
R

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,829
9,232
113
fluoxetine said:
Ron was open-ish and it was a terrible pass, but he wasn’t as open as someone should be.
Click to expand...
ND, as any team in their spot would, is defending hard, you're not going to get an easy pass to a wide open guy. It's going to be a difficult pass into a tight spot.
 
F

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
RU-05 said:
ND, as any team in their spot would, is defending hard, you're not going to get an easy pass to a wide open guy. It's going to be a difficult pass into a tight spot.
Click to expand...
Yeah agreed, I’ve still seen better though. But Paul threw it way over his head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU05
P

Pancho1939_rivals

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2012
1,887
2,907
113
zappaa said:
After speaking to several extremely knowledgeable basketball people, one of them a Rutgers hall of famer.
Their observation of our inbound play against ND was one of complete amazement considering the situation.
Said they felt bad for Paul he was asked to deliver the ball given the setup
Click to expand...

obviously the people you spoke to are F-ing morons. Geo was open paul missed him. Caleb was open paul missed him. Ron was open paul threw it over his head.

you guys will say anything to kill pikiell. Literally anything. It is kind of gross.

you are all ignoring the fact that three guys were open and paul didn’t throw it to any of them
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3
T

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,717
19,796
61
RU-05 said:
ND, as any team in their spot would, is defending hard, you're not going to get an easy pass to a wide open guy. It's going to be a difficult pass into a tight spot.
Click to expand...
fluoxetine said:
Yeah agreed, I’ve still seen better though. But Paul threw it way over his head.
Click to expand...

The defender guarding the ball has his back to the basket, he doesn’t know what’s happening behind him.

I would have liked to see a double screen with the #1 option flashing to Pauls right side (the open end of the court) and screen set for another man to peel off to Paul’s left side (towards the corner).

If you get to the corner you call a time out, if the ball goes to your #1 option you’re at the line icing the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU05
F

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Pancho1939 said:
you guys will say anything to kill pikiell. Literally anything. It is kind of gross.
Click to expand...
I think you’re unfairly lumping zappaa in here, he’s not one of those.

Its an unfortunate thing that retards have been allowed to run so amok here that it becomes a delicate thing to say anything negative at all lest someone assume you’re part of the “fire pike” crowd
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa and RU05
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom