You know statements like playing not to lose is pure fan BS. You develop a gameplan based on what you have on the roster. If you want to *****, ***** about a QB who can't lead with his arm or WR's who aren't open.
5-14 for 30 yards is all you need to know.
I didn't say they were playing not to lose and I'm sure they are doing what they can to win. That said and understanding the talent differential between RU and some of the B1G - I'm told the plan is to shorten the game to keep the D off the field and fresh and and also to win. We failed to score enough or get enough first downs in the 2nd half to do both. The plan was working in the first half - kinda. In the 2nd half the D got worn out and the O couldn't force the PeddState D to play honest D by making a couple of completions. The the running game suffered because the D was selling out against the run.
Talent differential - D wears out later in game, In-effective passing game, tough time scoring.
D on the field too much wears out against deeper bigger faster teams.
The coaching staff knows this so plans - I assume - that the best way to win is to shorten the game by focusing on running the ball - sadly the O could not execute the passing game part of the plan.
Some folks think this means trying not to lose - I think it's the smart way to play when you are out manned. We'll get better next year too. Hopefully we can complete some passes one of these years.