NU's Dark Ages ('76-'81)

ChappyCat

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2015
581
4
0
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
38,171
4,216
67
Curse of the Gladescat? They refused to admit his pet goat into Dyche Stadium. He got pissed and took his goat to Wheaton.

Seriously, that was before my time but my impression, based largely on the decision to hire Arnold Weber, was that the institution as a whole was not doing particularly well in the 1970s. It lagged in fundraising and capital and scholarly investment. The 1970s were not a great time for the US economy, and urban areas in particular were suffering from the racial tensions of the late 1960s and white flight. Then comes the oil shocks, stagflation, and the hostage crisis. I don’t sense that universities were sought out to lead us through these issues. I think NU probably struggled for an identity during these times.

More hypothesis than fact, but something that might provide context
 
Last edited:

kaTNap

Junior
Nov 6, 2005
2,665
275
83
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat

The administration under Bob Strotz wanted to kill the program, and sports programs in general, or perhaps convince the Ivy League to invite NU. (How that would have worked from a economic POV is hard to imagine.) Strotz was from U of Chicago, and thought the U of C route was the way to go. Once Strotz was gone and Arnie Weber (U of Colorado) came in, the administration was open to being competitive, even though almost everyone by that time thought it was impossible.
 

Aging Booster

Freshman
Apr 10, 2014
1,085
85
0
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat
Many folks do not remember that we were a darn good football team in the early '70s under Alex Agase. We finished 2nd in the Big Ten one year and beat OSU. Purdue hired Agase for more money. Our unwillingness to retain Agase was a signal that times were changing.
President Robert Strotz believed that success in athletics diminished the academic stature of the school, and intentionally sought to destroy NU's sports programs. He completely failed to appreciate the unique character of NU, combining Big Ten athletics, a fun-loving lakeshore campus, and a top-notch academic program. In the 1960s, NU was known as the "North Shore Country Club", a school for smart rich young men and women. As late as the mid-'70s, I had a professor tell me that the current students were all "kiss-asses" (he used a stronger word indicative of greater sexual contact than kissing") who wanted good grades and unseamly strove for success. He found it all very dirty. He said that young men should spend their spring afternoons on Deering Meadow, throwing footballs and moving on pretty coeds. That attitude still had remnants at NU in the '70s, and Strotz wanted to change it . Strotz had both the Greek system and intercollegiate athletics in his sights. He hoped to remake NU into the U of C. We had horrible facilities, low coaching salaries, and miniscule recruiting budgets during his tenure. On occasion, I would work out with frat brothers who were on the football or baseball teams. They all shared a weight room under Dyche that was not much better than that in Patton. I never saw a weight or conditioning coach there.
By the early '80s, alumni pressure and unrest on the Board of Trustees produced a change in the school's orientation to athletics. Strotz was forced to hire a new AD - Doug Single from Stanford, a bright, dynamic, and charismatic young man who impressed both the Chicago media and NU's female students in equal measure. He brought with him, Dennis Green. I met both men in the fall of 1981. Shortly thereafter, Dennis asked a few of us, as dedicated "fans", to help him by starting a booster club. It became the Gridiron Network. We had two functions - to raise sufficient funds to buy things for the program that the school's budget could not afford and to maintain pressure on the administration to improve athletics. Our first purchase was screens for the practice field, so that opposing scouts could not watch the practices. We were more successful in applying pressure than in raising $$$. Darryl Zupancic led an effort for a new weight room and football office building. He traveled, at his own expense, to 30 different schools, many small academic schools, and took pictures and conducted interviews at each. He put together a program for the Trustees that indicated just how terrible our facilities were relative even to Ivy League and Div.II institutions. The Trustees approved the football building that still stands west of McGaw Hall - it should always have been named for Darryl.
Single soon ran into problems and was replaced by a little guy named Bruce Corrie, whom many of us consider whimpy, pompous, and ineffective - not a good combination. He hated the Gridiron Network, perceiving it as a challenge to his authority, and refashioned it under the umbrella of the Wildcat Club. According to Athlketic Department gossip, Corrie is best remembered for stealing newspapers from outside his office in the early morning hours for over a year after he was fired. (The mighty shall have their revenge!)
Dennis loved NU and its alums, but he received little support and left for a better offer. He was replaced by Francis Peay, one of our assistant coaches, in what I think was Strotz's final year as President. Francis was as gentlemanly a man as I have ever met - kind, gracious, soft-spoken, but all wrapped up in a big bear-like physique. Francis won an recently unprecedented 4 or so games in his first year, and the new President, Arnie Weber, had to retain him over his better judgment. Francis ultimately failed to build on his initial success, giving Weber, who truly wanted to rebuild athletics and was hired to do so by the Trustees, the chance to bring in Gary Barnett, whom he had known and respected at Univ. of Colorado. The rest you know.
 

IdahoAlum

Freshman
May 29, 2001
3,832
85
0
It's ironic, I was going through one of my old NU yearbooks just yesterday and came across a story I wrote for the Syllabus about Tex Winter's departure as head basketball coach in 1978. He said at the time he wanted to "restore his reputation," by going to Long Beach State. Yes, LBS was considered a "move up" to NU in those days. I also described McGaw Hall at that time -- dirt floor, splintered bleachers, etc. Finally, I mentioned the fact that Winter said he could not offer 90 percent of Big Ten basketball players because NU's admission standards were so tight. So that gives you at least a few of the pieces -- terrible national perception, lousy facilities and very difficult academic standards with little wiggle room.
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,963
1,353
113
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat
Robert Strotz wanted to kill the program and did everything he could to accomplish it. We had a very competitive program in 1970 and 1971 finishing second in the BIG both years but only one team went to a bowl game. He withheld funding at every turn and then after he had chased out Agase as HC brought in Johny Pont to try to finish off the program. Maybe Waterboy could add something because he was there at the beginning of the end Agase and beginning of Pont. Got to remember there was no BTN or other funding sources at the time
 

Aging Booster

Freshman
Apr 10, 2014
1,085
85
0
Robert Strotz wanted to kill the program and did everything he could to accomplish it. We had a very competitive program in 1970 and 1971 finishing second in the BIG both years but only one team went to a bowl game. He withheld funding at every turn and then after he had chased out Agase as HC brought in Johny Pont to try to finish off the program. Maybe Waterboy could add something because he was there at the beginning of the end Agase and beginning of Pont. Got to remember there was no BTN or other funding sources at the time
I might add that Strotz initiated the culture wars at NU that still exist today - the nerds vs the Greeks. We used to wince at the increasing numbers of students being admitted to the school who had no interest in sports, beer, or pretty girls. Attendance at football and basketball games was still relatively high in the '70s, but we could see problems down the pipe if admissions decisions continued in the same vein. Less focus on children of alums, less priority given to H.S. extra-curricular activities, and even a reduction in the once vaunted "pretty girl quota", all threatened to unmake our school for the one Strotz wanted.
 
Sep 15, 2006
12,698
996
0
The administration under Bob Strotz wanted to kill the program, and sports programs in general, or perhaps convince the Ivy League to invite NU. (How that would have worked from a economic POV is hard to imagine.) Strotz was from U of Chicago, and thought the U of C route was the way to go. Once Strotz was gone and Arnie Weber (U of Colorado) came in, the administration was open to being competitive, even though almost everyone by that time thought it was impossible.

Yup. My uncle was actually a victim of the original University of Chicago route. He had a football scholarship to Chicago and had just completed his freshman year when Hutchins killed the program there.
 

docrugby1

Senior
Jun 16, 2010
6,919
512
88
I will echo the above post that NU has changed dramatically since my years of attendance.The composition of the student body is noticeably different. I will leave it to others to speculate what that means

My youngest son went to SMU and I can tell you that sun dresses and cowboy boots make football games worth attending
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,718
2,126
113
Just two words is all you need to know about the Dark Ages: Bob Strotz.
 

Gladeskat

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2004
116,629
1,824
113
Outstanding comments, starting with Hungry Jack's excellent opening remarks on academia's and society's upheaval and lack of direction during such turbulent times. NU was adrift when I was there.

It wasn't Pont's objective to "finish off the program". He was simply the best guy NU could find for the money they were willing the pay. Without a competitive budget, you wind up with an outdated coach like Coach Pont, rotten facilities (if any), and poor recruiting. The Dark Ages. When NU started sinking some competitive money into the program, they lowered the drawbridge.
 

Catbeast

Redshirt
Jun 18, 2016
93
4
0
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat


One Leader more than anyone else destroyed our athletic program and spirit on campus:

ROBERT STROTZ

Without question

I can’t even believe Northwestern made him President


Such a poor choice. Arnold Weber had a turnaround on his hands - on many issues - when he arrived at Northwestetn.

STROTZ was an idiot. The university should have fired him.

There. Now you all know how I really feel. LOL!
 

Katatonic

Sophomore
Oct 23, 2004
86,854
134
0
The thing I'll add to Strotz having been a disaster for NU sports and the university in general is that the belief by some was that Strotz was angling for an Ivy League invite (have read about such a notion here and there, but difficult to find a concrete source on that).

What gives credence to that notion, however, was NU scheduling and playing against an Ivy League school in '86 (first time there was a game btwn a B1G and IL school in 33 years), Princeton, which was unusual enough, but it was also an away game.

As bad as the 'Cats were during that time, still crushed the Tigers 37-0.

https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/28/sports/college-football-princeton-stymied-by-northwestern.html

Followed CFB fairly closely at the time (granted, had to rely on old media), but had no recollection of the match-up.

I might add that Strotz initiated the culture wars at NU that still exist today - the nerds vs the Greeks. We used to wince at the increasing numbers of students being admitted to the school who had no interest in sports, beer, or pretty girls. Attendance at football and basketball games was still relatively high in the '70s, but we could see problems down the pipe if admissions decisions continued in the same vein. Less focus on children of alums, less priority given to H.S. extra-curricular activities, and even a reduction in the once vaunted "pretty girl quota", all threatened to unmake our school for the one Strotz wanted.

AB - don't think it was a lower emphasis on EC's as much as it was putting greater weight on certain EC's.
 

iskaboo

Sophomore
Aug 23, 2011
1,803
122
63
I was on campus from 1974 to 1978. I agree with nearly all of the comments above, but I also want to defend the spirit and perseverance of the players during those years. They knew that they would be mightily overmatched in most games, but they gave their all nonetheless.

As for Strotz, I was somehow invited to be part of a small group of students to tahpkevpartvin a ‘fireside chat’ with Strotz. When he arrived 30 minutes late, it was clear that he did not have a clue as to how to interact with students and left after 10 minutes. I got the feeling that he did not think students (and certainly not athletics) were all that important to the Northwesterm experience.
 

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
I want to get personal professions as to why the Northwestern Football program was so poor from 1976-1981 (and beyond). I have my thoughts and have done some research but I want to compile the reasons from all of you stakeholders. Also, if any of you have any literary resources to point to (articles, text, etc.), please point me in the right direction (perhaps I have not uncovered them yet). I am trying to develop a good thesis as to why Barnett succeeded in 95 where Pont, Venturi (and even Green and Peay) could not. I value the opinions and info from Wildcat nation.

Thanks in advance!

-ChappyCat
There was a great article (I think Sports Illustrated) which compared the 1980 Cats (no wins) to the 1980 Georgia Bulldogs (NC). I have since looked for it on the internet and not had any luck. It was written some time after that season and compared thngs like what the players did after college. One thing I remember is that I believe the percentage of NU players that went to law or medical school was about the same as the percentage of Georgia players that graduated.
 
Last edited:

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
38,171
4,216
67
The stories and anecdotes in this thread are priceless. Strotz is pretty much the anti-Christ of NU. How the hell he got the job as president of NU is a mystery to me.

On second thought, it makes sense. Academic institutions have always been prone to looking inward when it comes to assessing performance and seeking improvement. I worked on the strategic turnaround of a local university and was shocked by the absence of market and competitive data in the strategic planning process. It was my job to inject it, and the studies I ran and the conversations they sparked were quite interesting, to say the least. The lack of “customer” orientation can be a huge hurdle for these schools, though most have gotten better.
 
Sep 15, 2006
12,698
996
0
The stories and anecdotes in this thread are priceless. Strotz is pretty much the anti-Christ of NU. How the hell he got the job as president of NU is a mystery to me.

On second thought, it makes sense. Academic institutions have always been prone to looking inward when it comes to assessing performance and seeking improvement. I worked on the strategic turnaround of a local university and was shocked by the absence of market and competitive data in the strategic planning process. It was my job to inject it, and the studies I ran and the conversations they sparked were quite interesting, to say the least. The lack of “customer” orientation can be a huge hurdle for these schools, though most have gotten better.

Our country had just come through a very tumultuous few years and was still dealing with some big issues, Vietnam chief among them, in the late '60s-early '70s when I was going to school. The old rah-rah booze, party and sports college culture seemed petty to many people at the time. Attendance was not wonderful at NU the year I attended, although the fact that most of the teams weren't very good certainly contributed to this. These things tend to go through cycles, of course. Obviously, Strotz was an overreaction as I don't know of many colleges who've outright tried to kill their sports program. Although things at present are nothing like the past era, I do sense a mild return of activism creeping back onto college campuses.
 

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
The stories and anecdotes in this thread are priceless. Strotz is pretty much the anti-Christ of NU. How the hell he got the job as president of NU is a mystery to me.

On second thought, it makes sense. Academic institutions have always been prone to looking inward when it comes to assessing performance and seeking improvement. I worked on the strategic turnaround of a local university and was shocked by the absence of market and competitive data in the strategic planning process. It was my job to inject it, and the studies I ran and the conversations they sparked were quite interesting, to say the least. The lack of “customer” orientation can be a huge hurdle for these schools, though most have gotten better.
I was at the MSU game in 81 when we set THE RECORD. As is recorded, we took some time figuring out how to get the goalposts out of the ground, then hauled it up the stadium, threw it out and then carried it down the street to President Strotz's house and dumped it on his lawn. He came out wearing a purple jacket with various patches sewn onto it and said "We'll get them next year." I wandered off at this point and the group that remained hauled the goalposts on to the lake where they were never seen again.

Strotz was not my favorite person.
 

stpaulcat

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,344
902
113
Our country had just come through a very tumultuous few years and was still dealing with some big issues, Vietnam chief among them, in the late '60s-early '70s when I was going to school. The old rah-rah booze, party and sports college culture seemed petty to many people at the time. Attendance was not wonderful at NU the year I attended, although the fact that most of the teams weren't very good certainly contributed to this. These things tend to go through cycles, of course. Obviously, Strotz was an overreaction as I don't know of many colleges who've outright tried to kill their sports program. Although things at present are nothing like the past era, I do sense a mild return of activism creeping back onto college campuses.
It wasn't just Strotz, although he was bad. There was definitely an anti-athletic (or anti anything non-academic) sentiment among much of the faculty, or at least among enough to be a force. In spite of the tremendous resurgence of athletics at NU, this sentiment remains to a degree within the faculty today. I don't have anything concrete to base this on, but it has been scuttlebutt ever since I was at NU during the Parseghian era.
 

ChappyCat

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2015
581
4
0
Thanks for all the good insight and theses. It will be put to good use.

I want to echo what many of you said- Northwestern DID have some good teams. 1903, 1926, 1930-31, 1936, 1940, 1948, 1962, and 1970-1971 were all bright spots for the 'Cats and it is safe to say that we have had Wildcat football players, which is to say that they were competitive and fought to do things the right way. In speaking with former students, fans, and some of the players on teams in the 70s and 80s, that was the general consensus. But like much in this world, lack of leadership can really break the dam. Thank goodness for men like Pat Ryan, Morty Shapiro, and of course Phillips and Fitz, to help bring athletics to the point where they SHOULD be (and believe me we still have a ways to go) and where they have a fighting chance to bring their ships to shore, as opposed to be thrown to the waters with a porous boat and palmetto branches for oars.

I find it ironic (and I am not trying to trample on a man's grave), but Strotz passed away November 4, 1994. The good fortunes of Northwestern football started the following season after Strotz's passing. Some might look at it as a symbolic passing from darkness to light. Food for thought...

Glad we are getting back- Go 'Cats!
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,207
3,378
113
I will echo the above post that NU has changed dramatically since my years of attendance.The composition of the student body is noticeably different. I will leave it to others to speculate what that means

My youngest son went to SMU and I can tell you that sun dresses and cowboy boots make football games worth attending
You should go to UT if you like sun dresses. Didn’t know there were that many burnt orange Sun Dresses in existence.
 

its_the_sauce

Junior
May 29, 2001
4,580
369
83
I was at the MSU game in 81 when we set THE RECORD. As is recorded, we took some time figuring out how to get the goalposts out of the ground, then hauled it up the stadium, threw it out and then carried it down the street to President Strotz's house and dumped it on his lawn. He came out wearing a purple jacket with various patches sewn onto it and said "We'll get them next year." I wandered off at this point and the group that remained hauled the goalposts on to the lake where they were never seen again.

Strotz was not my favorite person.

I guess among other things Strotz was a fortune teller. We DID get them (MSU) the next year to end the road B10 streak.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,207
3,378
113
Thanks for all the good insight and theses. It will be put to good use.

I want to echo what many of you said- Northwestern DID have some good teams. 1903, 1926, 1930-31, 1936, 1940, 1948, 1962, and 1970-1971 were all bright spots for the 'Cats and it is safe to say that we have had Wildcat football players, which is to say that they were competitive and fought to do things the right way. In speaking with former students, fans, and some of the players on teams in the 70s and 80s, that was the general consensus. But like much in this world, lack of leadership can really break the dam. Thank goodness for men like Pat Ryan, Morty Shapiro, and of course Phillips and Fitz, to help bring athletics to the point where they SHOULD be (and believe me we still have a ways to go) and where they have a fighting chance to bring their ships to shore, as opposed to be thrown to the waters with a porous boat and palmetto branches for oars.

I find it ironic (and I am not trying to trample on a man's grave), but Strotz passed away November 4, 1994. The good fortunes of Northwestern football started the following season after Strotz's passing. Some might look at it as a symbolic passing from darkness to light. Food for thought...

Glad we are getting back- Go 'Cats!

Don’t forget to update the title of this thread. The Dark ages were much longer than 5 years.
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,718
2,126
113
As for Strotz, I was somehow invited to be part of a small group of students to tahpkevpartvin a ‘fireside chat’ with Strotz.

On a side note, never pass up a chance to tahpkevpartvin a fireside chat with the school president. :)
 

NURoseBowl

Junior
Jun 16, 2009
8,168
335
58
I was on campus from 1974 to 1978. I agree with nearly all of the comments above, but I also want to defend the spirit and perseverance of the players during those years. They knew that they would be mightily overmatched in most games, but they gave their all nonetheless.

As for Strotz, I was somehow invited to be part of a small group of students to tahpkevpartvin a ‘fireside chat’ with Strotz. When he arrived 30 minutes late, it was clear that he did not have a clue as to how to interact with students and left after 10 minutes. I got the feeling that he did not think students (and certainly not athletics) were all that important to the Northwesterm experience.
Sounds like the life of the party, this Strotz. Solid candidate for the stick-in-the-mud Hall of Fame.
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
38,171
4,216
67
On a side note, never pass up a chance to tahpkevpartvin a fireside chat with the school president. :)
I went to a covfefe once. I think the punch was spiked, because I walked out of there completely plastered.
 

DkeCat

Junior
Jan 14, 2002
3,986
338
68
Thanks for all the good insight and theses. It will be put to good use.

I want to echo what many of you said- Northwestern DID have some good teams. 1903, 1926, 1930-31, 1936, 1940, 1948, 1962, and 1970-1971 were all bright spots for the 'Cats and it is safe to say that we have had Wildcat football players, which is to say that they were competitive and fought to do things the right way. In speaking with former students, fans, and some of the players on teams in the 70s and 80s, that was the general consensus. But like much in this world, lack of leadership can really break the dam. Thank goodness for men like Pat Ryan, Morty Shapiro, and of course Phillips and Fitz, to help bring athletics to the point where they SHOULD be (and believe me we still have a ways to go) and where they have a fighting chance to bring their ships to shore, as opposed to be thrown to the waters with a porous boat and palmetto branches for oars.

I find it ironic (and I am not trying to trample on a man's grave), but Strotz passed away November 4, 1994. The good fortunes of Northwestern football started the following season after Strotz's passing. Some might look at it as a symbolic passing from darkness to light. Food for thought...

Glad we are getting back- Go 'Cats!

Actually spoke to a few NU historians on this topic. Don't remember his name, but there is a guy at the library who knows more than anyone on this topic. He did echo Strotz effect. Another thing he mentioned, that is also overlooked but relevant, were the changes in scholarship number caps in the 70s and how that affected NU. Putting limits on schollies hurt the schools that had poor depth like NU.
 

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
Curse of the Gladescat? They refused to admit his pet goat into Dyche Stadium. He got pissed and took his goat to Wheaton.
What would the goat eat? Dyche Stadium had that worn-smooth, hard-as-a-rock astroturf back then.
 

its_the_sauce

Junior
May 29, 2001
4,580
369
83
Actually spoke to a few NU historians on this topic. Don't remember his name, but there is a guy at the library who knows more than anyone on this topic. He did echo Strotz effect. Another thing he mentioned, that is also overlooked but relevant, were the changes in scholarship number caps in the 70s and how that affected NU. Putting limits on schollies hurt the schools that had poor depth like NU.

On the contrary I think scholarship caps help a school like NU (and many others) as it helps even the playing field. Once upon a time the ND's and Oklahoma's of the world had no limits.
 

stpaulcat

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,344
902
113
On the contrary I think scholarship caps help a school like NU (and many others) as it helps even the playing field. Once upon a time the ND's and Oklahoma's of the world had no limits.
Absolutely, that's when the resurgence of Duke, NU, Stanford, et.al. really began.
 

DkeCat

Junior
Jan 14, 2002
3,986
338
68
Absolutely, that's when the resurgence of Duke, NU, Stanford, et.al. really began.

So - found some notes. I thought the same thing originally, but it as the historian pointed out (and was validated by some folk close to the team), it had a bunch of unintended consequences that countered those obvious benefits. Namely, teams that did not get the superstar players like NU relied on competitive depth, and when you took away deeper pools of talent, you had less cream rising to the top (meaning we had less 2-star specials plugging holes in our roster). Limits on scholarships also made the superstar players jump on offers vs knowing room would always be there for them.

Quoted this article as well - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1010.2692&rep=rep1&type=pdf - lots of big words and small print, but the summary on pages 15-16 spell it out.
 

DkeCat

Junior
Jan 14, 2002
3,986
338
68
On the contrary I think scholarship caps help a school like NU (and many others) as it helps even the playing field. Once upon a time the ND's and Oklahoma's of the world had no limits.

Ironically - it was Pitt that caused the caps, believe it or not.
 

DkeCat

Junior
Jan 14, 2002
3,986
338
68
Not familiar with Pitt story. Pretty sure football scholarship limits were result of Title IX.

Common misconception - found this article from espn which covers both the Pitt story and where scholarships came from.

"Although scholarship limits came into effect around the same time as Title IX, in the mid-1970s, that's a coincidence. Back then, the NCAA was concerned that major football programs were hoarding players by giving them financial aid."

and

"Pittsburgh coach Johnny Majors reportedly gave scholarships to 90 freshmen in 1973, a move that came under scrutiny when the Panthers won the national championship in 1977. In response, the NCAA tried to ensure some equity of competition within particular sports."

http://www.espn.com/espnw/title-ix/article/7959799/the-silent-enemy-men-sports
 

Catreporter

Senior
Sep 4, 2007
5,004
507
113
Pitt brought in 70 players when Johnny Majors took over as coach in '73. Cats had beaten Pitt there in 1972 but lost to Tony Dorsett led Panthers in '73. For what it's worth, Gary Barnett said he came to NU thinking that the scholarship limits could make the playing field more even for Northwestern
 

JoeWildcat

Sophomore
Jul 31, 2001
2,725
133
46
Common misconception - found this article from espn which covers both the Pitt story and where scholarships came from.

"Although scholarship limits came into effect around the same time as Title IX, in the mid-1970s, that's a coincidence. Back then, the NCAA was concerned that major football programs were hoarding players by giving them financial aid."

and

"Pittsburgh coach Johnny Majors reportedly gave scholarships to 90 freshmen in 1973, a move that came under scrutiny when the Panthers won the national championship in 1977. In response, the NCAA tried to ensure some equity of competition within particular sports."

http://www.espn.com/espnw/title-ix/article/7959799/the-silent-enemy-men-sports
That's exactly right. The motivation for imposing the scholarship limit was because some big schools were warehousing players. I have a vague recollection of the Nebraska coach telling someone that he gave scholarships to any player he thought was being recruited seriously by his big rivals. I think he said that he knew most of those scholarship players would never see the field, but he would rather have them on his bench than on the field playing for for opponents. In those days it was also more difficult for players to transfer, so once a team landed a player, they had less mobility than they do today.