Toggle sidebar

Rushing literally by the inch...

D

D_C_B

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2016
663
21
0
DKE didn't like the fact that his thread about sacks got me thinking about how the real issue is the running game. So, in our time of OL despair, to be a nice guy and let DKE get back to discussing the incracracies of sack responsibility, and proving the old cliche that football is a game of inches, I give you the real problem:

We rushed for three-digit INCHES against Wisconsin.

Not yards. Not even feet. Inches. 926 inches. That was our rushing stat.

And that's on top of a stellar 756 inch rushing performance against Duke.

Wake up people! We might be the only P5 team in the entire country to have not one but two rushing performances that didn't crack into 4 digit inches! Frankly, is be surprised if we are not.

It is that bad. Dark ages bad. And I'm not even certain we did this in the Dark Ages.
 
Last edited:
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
D_C_B said:
DKE didn't like the fact that his thread about sacks got me thinking about how the real issue is the running game. So, in our time of OL despair, to be a nice guy and let DKE get back to discussing the incracracies of sack responsibility, and proving the old cliche that football is a game of inches, I give you the real problem:

We rushed for three-digit INCHES against Wisconsin.

Not yards. Not even feet. Inches. 926 inches. That was our rushing stat.

And that's on top of a stellar 756 inch rushing performance against Duke.

Wake up people! We might be the only P5 team in the entire country to have not one but two rushing performances that didn't crack into 4 digit inches! Frankly, is be surprised if we are not.

It is that bad. Dark ages bad. And I'm not even certain we did this in the Dark Ages.
Click to expand...

Yeah, this is Feli. Rote repetition of the same point over and over, bolded text... I'm convinced.
 
D

D_C_B

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2016
663
21
0
Deny deny deny.

Deflect deflect deflect.

I'm actually sad for you two that you have to ignore what is said instead deflect it to who said it.

What is this, Batman? Trying to figure out who millionaire Bruce Wayne is?

Ok. I'm Feli and Stuper and the Green Hornet and The Shadow and Spider-Man and Jack the Ripper and Turk and Wickerpark and the Ohantom of the Opera --- and for that matter I'm Catgirl too - and you should see me in my tight black latex bodysuit. Happy now?

Can we now address the fact that our staff, according to GCG, apparently hands decisionmaking authority over recruiting to an anonymous college kid? And that we can't run against anybody?
 
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
D_C_B said:
Deny deny deny.

Deflect deflect deflect.

I'm actually sad for you two that you have to ignore what is said instead deflect it to who said it.

What is this, Batman? Trying to figure out who millionaire Bruce Wayne is?

Ok. I'm Feli and Stuper and the Green Hornet and The Shadow and Spider-Man and Jack the Ripper and Turk and Wickerpark and the Ohantom of the Opera --- and for that matter I'm Catgirl too - and you should see me in my tight black latex bodysuit. Happy now?

Can we now address the fact that our staff, according to GCG, apparently hands decisionmaking authority over recruiting to an anonymous college kid? And that we can't run against anybody?
Click to expand...

Where did I say I had decisionmaking authority? I played a role in the recruiting process, but not like I was making "offer/don't offer" decisions. Christ, you're ridiculous.
 
M

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
D_C_B said:
Deny deny deny.

Deflect deflect deflect.

I'm actually sad for you two that you have to ignore what is said instead deflect it to who said it.

What is this, Batman? Trying to figure out who millionaire Bruce Wayne is?

Ok. I'm Feli and Stuper and the Green Hornet and The Shadow and Spider-Man and Jack the Ripper and Turk and Wickerpark and the Ohantom of the Opera --- and for that matter I'm Catgirl too - and you should see me in my tight black latex bodysuit. Happy now?

Can we now address the fact that our staff, according to GCG, apparently hands decisionmaking authority over recruiting to an anonymous college kid? And that we can't run against anybody?
Click to expand...

You're counting the sack yardage in our rushing totals, Stupor, which is ironic given the stated purpose of the thread
 
D

D_C_B

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2016
663
21
0
gocatsgo2003 said:
Where did I say I had decisionmaking authority? I played a role in the recruiting process, but not like I was making "offer/don't offer" decisions. Christ, you're ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Well, stop dancing around it and say what was your role was!

What's ridiculous (again, your accusational word, not mine) is how vague you are as you try to imply you had a role but won't say what it was... and then try to play the "experience" and "knowledge" cards.

it makes it hard to believe a word you say, to be honest.

What do you specifically know that all of us regular schmoes don't?

Stop intentionally dancing around it and expecting us to genuflect to you because you once learned the NU athletics filing system. I gave up on the Church. I don't genuflect anymore to anyone without some evidence. Claims don't cut it.
 
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
D_C_B said:
Well, stop dancing around it and say what was your role was!

What's ridiculous (again, your accusational word, not mine) is how vague you are as you try to imply you had a role but won't say what it was... and then try to play the "experience" and "knowledge" cards.

it makes it hard to believe a word you say, to be honest.

What do you specifically know that all of us regular schmoes don't?

Stop intentionally dancing around it and expecting us to genuflect to you because you once learned the NU athletics filing system. I gave up on the Church. I don't genuflect anymore to anyone without some evidence. Claims don't cut it.
Click to expand...

Offensive Quality Control then Recruiting Assistant then promoted to Assistant Director of Player Personnel. This isn't exactly a secret around here.
 
D

D_C_B

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2016
663
21
0
Great. Thank you. Why do I feel like I just performed a quadruple bypass root canal pulling that out of you? Are you this vague with everyone or did I get some sort of special rookie hazing honor tonight?

Thanks again. You just confirmed my instinct that you're hopelessly biased in favor of this staff.

That's ok. I love my wife and kids. We all have our biases. You and I will not discuss any staff members again. I give you my word on that. It's a waste of both of our time.
 
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
D_C_B said:
Great. Thank you. Why do I feel like I just performed a quadruple bypass root canal pulling that out of you? Are you this vague with everyone or did I get some sort of special rookie hazing honor tonight?

Thanks again. You just confirmed my instinct that you're hopelessly biased in favor of this staff.

That's ok. I love my wife and kids. We all have our biases. You and I will not discuss any staff members again. I give you my word on that. It's a waste of both of our time.
Click to expand...

Thank god. Have a nice evening being miserable. I'm beginning to understand why you've had to change screen names so often.
 
F

FloridAlum

Senior
May 29, 2001
16,227
588
0
gocatsgo2003 said:
Thank god. Have a nice evening being miserable. I'm beginning to understand why you've had to change screen names so often.
Click to expand...

He is stupor, Woodersoncat,and ten other names that have been banned. He is now up to banned name number 13.Sorry I was a bit slow to pick up on this one, but I was pretty much away from the board for a couple of weeks due to hurricane evacuation.
 
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
FloridAlum said:
He is stupor, Woodersoncat,and ten other names that have been banned. He is now up to banned name number 13.Sorry I was a bit slow to pick up on this one, but I was pretty much away from the board for a couple of weeks due to hurricane evacuation.
Click to expand...

Appreciate it. Is there not a way to ban by IP address, credit card, or however else you're determining that it's the same guy?
 
M

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
gocatsgo2003 said:
Appreciate it. Is there not a way to ban by IP address, credit card, or however else you're determining that it's the same guy?
Click to expand...

On the board I mod, I know that we ban specific IP addresess. Don't know if that technology is universal, though....
 
S

StreamCat

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
11,781
132
0
FloridAlum said:
He is stupor, Woodersoncat,and ten other names that have been banned. He is now up to banned name number 13.Sorry I was a bit slow to pick up on this one, but I was pretty much away from the board for a couple of weeks due to hurricane evacuation.
Click to expand...
You call that an excuse? :)
 
E

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,767
767
73
FloridAlum said:
He is stupor, Woodersoncat,and ten other names that have been banned. He is now up to banned name number 13.Sorry I was a bit slow to pick up on this one, but I was pretty much away from the board for a couple of weeks due to hurricane evacuation.
Click to expand...

What was he originally banned for? What crime was committed?

The court seems a bit on the tough side here. Have you no mercy?
 
A

AtlantaCat

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
13,566
168
63
EvanstonCat said:
Seriously? I may have missed it, but where was he any more insufferable than any of the rest of us schleps on this board? What was the crime for which he has been exiled?
Click to expand...

For questioning, rather than agreeing with, the blowhards?
 
P

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,908
1,060
113
EvanstonCat said:
Seriously? I may have missed it, but where was he any more insufferable than any of the rest of us schleps on this board? What was the crime for which he has been exiled?
Click to expand...
I think there is a written rule, seriously, against hammering the same theme over and over, particularly if negative.

Whereas I gripe bitterly for a day, then make snide comments for a couple of days, then get bored with it.

It's a bunch of college kids that go to a place that I attended in the frikkin 80s, chasing a ball around.

The process I am now going through, adopting a 4 year old whose mom overdosed, is slightly more important. But she is a huge Willie fan...
 
N

NURoseBowl

Junior
Jun 16, 2009
8,142
320
58
phatcat said:
I think there is a written rule, seriously, against hammering the same theme over and over, particularly if negative.

Whereas I gripe bitterly for a day, then make snide comments for a couple of days, then get bored with it.

It's a bunch of college kids that go to a place that I attended in the frikkin 80s, chasing a ball around.

The process I am now going through, adopting a 4 year old whose mom overdosed, is slightly more important. But she is a huge Willie fan...
Click to expand...
Wow, Phat, that's some serious business there. I tip my hat to you, and wish you two well.
 
G

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,850
3,194
78
phatcat said:
I think there is a written rule, seriously, against hammering the same theme over and over, particularly if negative.

Whereas I gripe bitterly for a day, then make snide comments for a couple of days, then get bored with it.

It's a bunch of college kids that go to a place that I attended in the frikkin 80s, chasing a ball around.

The process I am now going through, adopting a 4 year old whose mom overdosed, is slightly more important. But she is a huge Willie fan...
Click to expand...

It's not unwritten. It's right there in the Rivals Terms of Service:

Message Boards
Subscriber-only message boards are included in many Premium Ticket subscriptions. The accepted standards of conduct in these communities, as well as our other message board communities, are determined by the publishing partner of any given site. Subscribers and registered users agree that Rivals and its publishing partners have the right to enforce these standards, including deletion of posts, blacklisting/banning users, or removing access to premium message boards with no refund to the Subscriber.

By subscribing, registering or using the sites, you agree that Rivals and or the publisher(s) and board moderators of the sites have the right, in addition to other rights, to delete your posts or blacklist you or any other user at any time, if they believe that action is in the best interest of the sites, for whatever reason, and the reason need not be disclosed.

...

By signing up to post on Rivals' message boards, you agree that if Rivals blacklists you, you will cease and desist from posting on the message boards. If you are blacklisted, and subsequently sign up under new account(s) for the sole purpose of disrupting the message boards in any manner, you will be liable for damages to Rivals in the amount of fair compensation for time spent by Rivals staff and/or publishers in addition to any lost profits or revenues caused by your disruption and costs of collection of these damages, including attorneys fees. Due to difficulty in Rivals assessing these damages and costs, you agree that the minimum damage from violation of this provision will be $10,000 (without limitation on Rivals' ability to prove actual damages in excess of this amount).​
 
S

StreamCat

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
11,781
132
0
gocatsgo2003 said:
It's not unwritten. It's right there in the Rivals Terms of Service:

Message Boards
Subscriber-only message boards are included in many Premium Ticket subscriptions. The accepted standards of conduct in these communities, as well as our other message board communities, are determined by the publishing partner of any given site. Subscribers and registered users agree that Rivals and its publishing partners have the right to enforce these standards, including deletion of posts, blacklisting/banning users, or removing access to premium message boards with no refund to the Subscriber.

By subscribing, registering or using the sites, you agree that Rivals and or the publisher(s) and board moderators of the sites have the right, in addition to other rights, to delete your posts or blacklist you or any other user at any time, if they believe that action is in the best interest of the sites, for whatever reason, and the reason need not be disclosed.

...

By signing up to post on Rivals' message boards, you agree that if Rivals blacklists you, you will cease and desist from posting on the message boards. If you are blacklisted, and subsequently sign up under new account(s) for the sole purpose of disrupting the message boards in any manner, you will be liable for damages to Rivals in the amount of fair compensation for time spent by Rivals staff and/or publishers in addition to any lost profits or revenues caused by your disruption and costs of collection of these damages, including attorneys fees. Due to difficulty in Rivals assessing these damages and costs, you agree that the minimum damage from violation of this provision will be $10,000 (without limitation on Rivals' ability to prove actual damages in excess of this amount).​
Click to expand...
I think he said "written" not "unwritten".
 
M

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
gocatsgo2003 said:
It's not unwritten. It's right there in the Rivals Terms of Service:

Message Boards
Subscriber-only message boards are included in many Premium Ticket subscriptions. The accepted standards of conduct in these communities, as well as our other message board communities, are determined by the publishing partner of any given site. Subscribers and registered users agree that Rivals and its publishing partners have the right to enforce these standards, including deletion of posts, blacklisting/banning users, or removing access to premium message boards with no refund to the Subscriber.

By subscribing, registering or using the sites, you agree that Rivals and or the publisher(s) and board moderators of the sites have the right, in addition to other rights, to delete your posts or blacklist you or any other user at any time, if they believe that action is in the best interest of the sites, for whatever reason, and the reason need not be disclosed.

...

By signing up to post on Rivals' message boards, you agree that if Rivals blacklists you, you will cease and desist from posting on the message boards. If you are blacklisted, and subsequently sign up under new account(s) for the sole purpose of disrupting the message boards in any manner, you will be liable for damages to Rivals in the amount of fair compensation for time spent by Rivals staff and/or publishers in addition to any lost profits or revenues caused by your disruption and costs of collection of these damages, including attorneys fees. Due to difficulty in Rivals assessing these damages and costs, you agree that the minimum damage from violation of this provision will be $10,000 (without limitation on Rivals' ability to prove actual damages in excess of this amount).​
Click to expand...

10K? "Moose, Rocco, help Stupor find his checkbook....."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom