So much more fun when you don’t know. It’s part of the game.How do you know it's a she?
Just another sign we are at war within our bordersThis is an internal Supreme Court issue which has never occurred until now. SC doesn't need or want their business news released until they release their judgement.
I saw her at Food City last weekend coming off the Appalachian Trail up in Erwin, TNOk, for sure wood, definitely use a bag though. She’s no stranger to the D.
A cold civil war ?Just another sign we are at war within our borders
What if the elites in charge decided you needed to be aborted?We need waaaaayyy more abortions in this country. Not less. I would be in favor of mandatory abortions in the US based on income and drug history
I fail to see how that would be fun. Then again, I am straight.So much more fun when you don’t know. It’s part of the game.
I would never know. I would have never been alive.What if the elites in charge decided you needed to be aborted?
That doesn't make sense based on your post which makes it sound like you want to abort people based on income and drug history. What if your income fell within the range in which you get to be aborted?I would never know. I would have never been alive.
Why not be responsible & get people fixed ? Ahhhhhh never mind you're a Democrat taking responsibility for your actions is asking a bit much .We need waaaaayyy more abortions in this country. Not less. I would be in favor of mandatory abortions in the US based on income and drug history
Big time. 70% of the country is pro choice. All we need is for Biff to open his mouth about it.Shakes up the mid-terms a bit as stated above in this thread. Dumb move by Alito
A lot more people than 16 had motive. You are assuming the only people with motive are those who disagree with the majority. The leak could have been done to convince the 5 Justices in the majority to maintain their position or to carefully tweak the final draft of the Opinion. The Opinion doesn't have to completely overturn Roe v. Wade to deal a blow to the pro-choicers. The majority might be contemplating how severe or moderate the Opinion should be.Now, let's talk about treason. It appears that less than 40 people had access. 16 with motive. Should not be too hard to find out leaked it.
I agreed with the 2006 joe Biden for the most part . But Biden is such a flip flopping habitual liar cooked veggie that is controlled by the DSA. The 70% that you speak of also agrees with me but the far left Democrats who want late term is destroying any common ground.Big time. 70% of the country is pro choice. All we need is for Biff to open his mouth about it.
It is a time for celebration if this does become the ruling. The Constitution wins. Have you even attempted to read the rabbit hole briar patch that is called the RvW decision?OP thought this was a cause for celebration. What a clown
Simply 'sending it back to the states' has 2 problems. (1) some states are writing laws prohibiting state residents from getting abortions in other states. (2) Centers in states like NY and MA are gonna get inundated with out of state women and the funding/staff situation is underfunded.The supreme court is not outlawing abortion they are simply sending it back to the states where it belongs.
I don’t think we ever find out who did itA lot more people than 16 had motive. You are assuming the only people with motive are those who disagree with the majority. The leak could have been done to convince the 5 Justices in the majority to maintain their position or to carefully tweak the final draft of the Opinion. The Opinion doesn't have to completely overturn Roe v. Wade to deal a blow to the pro-choicers. The majority might be contemplating how severe or moderate the Opinion should be.
You are probably right in who leaked it and why, but it is best to pump the brakes a little here and let the facts come out before concluding what happened with no evidence yet. It is identical to the Goerge Floyd incident when everyone immediately screamed racism and pretended they knew what happened from a 3 minute video. I sat back saying let the investigation run its course to see what really happened and....what a shock....no evidence of racism was ever found.
1. Those laws preclude interstate commerce and will be struck down.Simply 'sending it back to the states' has 2 problems. (1) some states are writing laws prohibiting state residents from getting abortions in other states. (2) Centers in states like NY and MA are gonna get inundated with out of state women and the funding/staff situation is underfunded.
Agree 100% except for pumping the brakes. There is the logical and legal process of finding out what really happened. In that instance, pumping the brakes is the right thing to do. I only wish our society would act accordingly.A lot more people than 16 had motive. You are assuming the only people with motive are those who disagree with the majority. The leak could have been done to convince the 5 Justices in the majority to maintain their position or to carefully tweak the final draft of the Opinion. The Opinion doesn't have to completely overturn Roe v. Wade to deal a blow to the pro-choicers. The majority might be contemplating how severe or moderate the Opinion should be.
You are probably right in who leaked it and why, but it is best to pump the brakes a little here and let the facts come out before concluding what happened with no evidence yet. It is identical to the Goerge Floyd incident when everyone immediately screamed racism and pretended they knew what happened from a 3 minute video. I sat back saying let the investigation run its course to see what really happened and....what a shock....no evidence of racism was ever found.
Simply 'sending it back to the states' has 2 problems. (1) some states are writing laws prohibiting state residents from getting abortions in other states. (2) Centers in states like NY and MA are gonna get inundated with out of state women and the funding/staff situation is underfunded.
I don’t think we ever find out who did it
If Planned Parenthood is using federal funds to offset the cost of abortions, we have a major issue that needs to be addressed.Simply 'sending it back to the states' has 2 problems. (1) some states are writing laws prohibiting state residents from getting abortions in other states. (2) Centers in states like NY and MA are gonna get inundated with out of state women and the funding/staff situation is underfunded.
No ****.They raided Project Veritas over the president's daughter's diary. We won't see anything similar.
Or you can just do America a favor and move to China where soft kvnts are rewarded.We need waaaaayyy more abortions in this country. Not less. I would be in favor of mandatory abortions in the US based on income and drug history
My body my choice might carry some weight with me in regards to irresponsible preggos looking for post stupidity birth control except its not their body they are choosing to affect. They want to kill the baby they created via their own stupidity.1. I am pro-choice. But let me explain. I'm against abortion in most cases. Medical problems where death is likely for the mother, or rape/incest of a child, etc. I also think that partial-birth abortions and other late-term abortions (non-medical) are brutal and should never be allowed to be done.
2. The hypocrisy of both sides is what fires me up. On one side, you have a group who preach "my body, my choice"...........WTF am I saying, BOTH sides preach this.....one for abortion and one for vaccines. Yet both sides will take up the opposite side of this argument as long as it fits them and their desires.
It's simple:
Liberals, if you want abortions, then don't force people to take a vaccine that is still in experimental stages and claim its "the right thing" to do for keeping people safe.....even if it may hurt the person who takes it or doesn't actually prevent the spread of the virus.
Conservatives, don't tell people they cannot force you to do something because it's "your body", but then try and dictate medical procedures, like abortion, for people who see it as their only option. (again, before blowing up, see my stance) Where does this stop? Do we charge an expected mother with child abuse or murder if they take drugs or smoke during pregnancy, resulting in a birth of a child that is mentally/physically disabled or stillborn?
I don't care what the Court rules on this. Doesn't change my mind. I also don't care about the leak, because I have learned to expect leaks in today's times. BOTH sides will leak information, especially if it means they could potentially gain political power. It is no coincidence that the leak took place before many primaries.
For clarification, I'm not supporting those women who go and get an abortion because they were slutting around and got pregnant. Adoption should be the alternative for them.My body my choice might carry some weight with me in regards to irresponsible preggos looking for post stupidity birth control except its not their body they are choosing to affect. They want to kill the baby they created via their own stupidity.
Now in regards to medical and incest I think we will find common ground. If we can eliminate abortion to simply those instances we will see a small fraction of cases.
Good post. Something that’s never discussed and should be are the rights of the father as well. I don’t believe women should be allowed to abort a pregnancy without mutual consent of the father.1. I am pro-choice. But let me explain. I'm against abortion in most cases. Medical problems where death is likely for the mother, or rape/incest of a child, etc. I also think that partial-birth abortions and other late-term abortions (non-medical) are brutal and should never be allowed to be done.
2. The hypocrisy of both sides is what fires me up. On one side, you have a group who preach "my body, my choice"...........WTF am I saying, BOTH sides preach this.....one for abortion and one for vaccines. Yet both sides will take up the opposite side of this argument as long as it fits them and their desires.
It's simple:
Liberals, if you want abortions, then don't force people to take a vaccine that is still in experimental stages and claim its "the right thing" to do for keeping people safe.....even if it may hurt the person who takes it or doesn't actually prevent the spread of the virus.
Conservatives, don't tell people they cannot force you to do something because it's "your body", but then try and dictate medical procedures, like abortion, for people who see it as their only option. (again, before blowing up, see my stance) Where does this stop? Do we charge an expected mother with child abuse or murder if they take drugs or smoke during pregnancy, resulting in a birth of a child that is mentally/physically disabled or stillborn?
I don't care what the Court rules on this. Doesn't change my mind. I also don't care about the leak, because I have learned to expect leaks in today's times. BOTH sides will leak information, especially if it means they could potentially gain political power. It is no coincidence that the leak took place before many primaries.
Abortion and a vaccine is apples and oranges. One does not impact the other.1. I am pro-choice. But let me explain. I'm against abortion in most cases. Medical problems where death is likely for the mother, or rape/incest of a child, etc. I also think that partial-birth abortions and other late-term abortions (non-medical) are brutal and should never be allowed to be done.
2. The hypocrisy of both sides is what fires me up. On one side, you have a group who preach "my body, my choice"...........WTF am I saying, BOTH sides preach this.....one for abortion and one for vaccines. Yet both sides will take up the opposite side of this argument as long as it fits them and their desires.
It's simple:
Liberals, if you want abortions, then don't force people to take a vaccine that is still in experimental stages and claim its "the right thing" to do for keeping people safe.....even if it may hurt the person who takes it or doesn't actually prevent the spread of the virus.
Conservatives, don't tell people they cannot force you to do something because it's "your body", but then try and dictate medical procedures, like abortion, for people who see it as their only option. (again, before blowing up, see my stance) Where does this stop? Do we charge an expected mother with child abuse or murder if they take drugs or smoke during pregnancy, resulting in a birth of a child that is mentally/physically disabled or stillborn?
I don't care what the Court rules on this. Doesn't change my mind. I also don't care about the leak, because I have learned to expect leaks in today's times. BOTH sides will leak information, especially if it means they could potentially gain political power. It is no coincidence that the leak took place before many primaries.
Absolutely. It takes two to make a baby. Well, in most cases.Good post. Something that’s never discussed and should be are the rights of the father as well. I don’t believe women should be allowed to abort a pregnancy without mutual consent of the father.
Then there should be no problems with States passing abortion laws right?Big time. 70% of the country is pro choice. All we need is for Biff to open his mouth about it.
This was leaked for a reason. The mid terms calculus just changed. Abortion just became THE campaign issue
Shakes up the mid-terms a bit as stated above in this thread. Dumb move by Alito
Big time. 70% of the country is pro choice. All we need is for Biff to open his mouth about it.
Completely believable statement from a BIGOT like you..We need waaaaayyy more abortions in this country. Not less. I would be in favor of mandatory abortions in the US based on income and drug history