Lyndsey Graham on Impeachment
- Thread starter tjebarr
- Start date
Do we have to drag up all of the dims who also spoke at this time? This thread has the potential for 5 pages...
I thought it was about him misplacing a cigar and a young unpaid intern found it, decided to put in a box, and return it to him. I could be wrong, I'm old and poor and my memory is not very good.
Most likely, but they are professionals who does this type of thing for a living. ML is still in hiding after 18 years, he destroyed her life, but who cares, she deserved it, right? Some old creepy President did something
pretty, pretty sure, someone else did that and got impeached over it, being old, it will come back to me.
Exactly. He got impeached over it. This is where we need to go now. Thanks for strengthening my point.
Did she file sexual assault charges? Was she a willing participant?
How many times has Trump cheated on a wife of his????? (that we know of)
So what you are saying is......
1. Lie about getting a BJ in the Oval Office = impeachment
2. Asking foreign governments to help you get rid of a political opponent = OK
How many woman are sexually assaulted by a dominant authority figure? They are afraid to lose their job, life, or self and shut up and take...did you miss the entire #metoo movement? I know, she was asking for it. All college interns are just asking for it.
Come to think about it, Linda Tripp is the original whistle blower. How was she treated?
You mean like Trump and his accusers? And those that haven't spoken up yet?
As for Monica, what has she said about it?
More than a bj, he was/is a sexual predator and did far worse than that. And yes, what he did to those young ladies is far worse than wanting a foreign gov. to help uncover corruption in the US and the country he is working with.
Remember, Ukraine has issues with corruption and natural gas is their future. If your largest asset is corrupt, I think they want to investigate it. If they are giving money to the opposition party of their biggest supporter, they might want to know about that also. Agreed?
She just recently came out and talked about her struggle to go out in public and how it has taken a toll on her...do you think she really enjoyed it?
No, like all of those women who came forward while he was in AK. There were so many women coming forward, they Clinton campaign called them BIMBO eruptions, and officially made statements like this...if you drag a $20 bill in a trailer park....
Last edited:
That makes a huge difference, I'm good with it now. Good thing you cleared that up for us.
Going by the left's standard in the prior few years..... it appears to be OK.
Otherwise I'm gonna just start yelling Deepstate at every turn.
So, a woman who had an affair with a married man is embarrassed about going out in public after it has become known? SHOCKED!
Has she said he sexually "assaulted" her?
I suggest you get out the HR booklet from your employer and review before you cost yourself a career. 18 years ago they allowed that narrative to persist. Not any more. Two consenting adults in a work setting does not include subordinates, especially unpaid interns who want to land a full time job.
Good luck with your view of workplace sexual assault...
So you are saying that she has not said he assaulted her, that she was willing and consented, and that she is now embarrassed about it and the attention she gets from it?????
I'm failing to see something that would qualify as "criminal"?
Not saying it was criminal, it is not allowed in a gov/corporate setting. If the President had a sexual relationship with an unpaid intern, he would be impeached today and thrown out of office. Obama could not survive that. He would not go jail, but he would lose his job.
When Clinton lied about it under oath, that was criminal, and that is what he was impeached for.
What do you think happened?
Consenting adults has no bearing in a corp/gov setting when one has the ability to promote, reward, or have disciplinary power over that employee. You can have a consenting sexual relationship with someone in your company if one has no power over the other, ie, a director of marketing could have a relationship with a manager in manufacturing but they could not have a relationship with a marketing manager that reports directly to them or in a collaborating marketing team where they may have influence that could further/destroy that persons career. It's really pretty clear cut.
This is your previous post.
This is the post you were responding to.
Both the post you responded to and your own post mentioned sexual assault. You were insinuating a supervisor-subordinate relationship involving a consensual relationship was sexual assault. Don't move the goalposts now, moron.
You were wrong, as you usually are. Just admit it and move along.
I do believe that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted ML. And if this happened today, Sexual Assault would be an option as a remedy.
Do you remember this? I am sure you do, you most likely agreed that Trump should have been arrested.
https://fortune.com/2019/02/25/trump-campaign-staffer-lawsuit-against-sexual-assault/
If Trump would have stuck a cigar in her ****** in the oval office, I would say that Trump would not be president today...and you would be very happy.
Now, let's review your last sentence.
So, Bill sexually "assaulted" a fellow adult female who was ok with the sexual encounter? You've lost your mind.......
EDIT: According to Stormy, if Trump would have stuck it in Monica it wouldn't have lasted very long........[laughing]
I do believe that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted ML. And if this happened today, Sexual Assault would be an option as a remedy. He also assaulted other women in AK, but they were verbally destroyed by HRC and his staff.
Do you remember this? I am sure you do, you most likely agreed that Trump should have been arrested.
https://fortune.com/2019/02/25/trump-campaign-staffer-lawsuit-against-sexual-assault/
If Trump would have stuck a cigar in her ****** in the oval office, I would say that Trump would not be president today...and you would be very happy.
