I think you are glossing over some very good information. Mueller did a pretty good job of defining exactly how the Russian efforts of influence were structured. Definitively asserts that Russia was responsible for the DNC Jack, and additional efforts they made (a fact someone in here disputed just weeks ago). Mueller also stated that he did not want to overstep his scope and authority in a couple of instances.When the weight of the entire intel community and mainstream media come at you with you are a traitor, then spend 2 years with 20 lawyers and 40 FBI agents, and this is the report they come up with? "No collusion and he tried to stop the investigation". GFOH
Like for the MJ gif
And I’ve expressed concern over Clinton. Even went as far as to support an SC appointment to look into the foundation and all the U-1 stuff. Moreover, I wouldn’t have any problem with yet another pursuit of her private server actions by the DOJ.
Deflecting to Clinton isn’t an answer to the questions the report, that this thread is referencing, raises.
Never thought Coop was so dead on, anything to own da Libz.....even abandoning your principles.
I think you are glossing over some very good information. Mueller did a pretty good job of defining exactly how the Russian efforts of influence were structured. Definitively asserts that Russia was responsible for the DNC Jack, and additional efforts they made (a fact someone in here disputed just weeks ago). Mueller also stated that he did not want to overstep his scope and authority in a couple of instances.
He brought charges against the Russian apparatus that committed these crimes, even if not prosecuted, at least we have identified clearly the methods, companies and some of the individuals involved.
Mueller brought to light a clearer understanding of the numbers of social media accounts directly affected by Russian influence, and the avenues they take to sow social discord.
Despite what I think about Trump campaign collusion. The investigation was not only warranted, but was effective in identifying Russian influence on the 2016 election.
Don't forget racist.
Yeah, that’s not what the report saidGood glad to hear you say that. Meantime try this:
"no collusion, no obstruction".
I’ve always cared about the principles of people who think differently from me. I’ve learned a lot from that approach, I’ve changed a lot as well. Why would I automatically deny myself knowledge that can help me, my family, my community, or my country? Seems foolish to me.Why do you on the Left care what our "principles" are? If we don't have any left, or abandon what we had, aren't we joining you folks on the Left?
Why are you complaining instead of welcoming us to a new life of immoral debauchery?
It’s not. I will totally admit that no evidence for collusion was found. But obstruction is another story completely.LMAO!
I’ve always cared about the principles of people who think differently from me. I’ve learned a lot from that approach, I’ve changed a lot as well. Why would I automatically deny myself knowledge that can help me, my family, my community, or my country? Seems foolish to me.
I can’t wait for the day when it’s revealed Trump paid for an abortion for one of his side sluts.
Do you really think Trump is a Christian? Really? After all you’ve learned about this man?He may have a chance to sign infanticide legislation next year if your side can get it passed. That would seal the deal too with us "a-moral" Christians 'ya think? [eyeroll]
It’s not. I will totally admit that no evidence for collusion was found. But obstruction is another story completely.
Do you really think Trump is a Christian? Really? After all you’ve learned about this man?
Don't forget that country has been saying for years that Mueller was going to indict Don Jr. LOL
He’s my PresidentAs I said boomer, I make it a habit to try and not judge another Man's walk. Do I think he knows Christ? Yes, I do!
Is he "Christian" meaning he follows Christ and tries to live a Christ-like life?
I honestly can't answer that. I do know that's the standard for being a Christian. I sincerely hope he follows it, and I would imagine he tries.
Why are you worried as much about if he is or isn't instead of yourself?
He said that poor fool. He certainly didnt say the exact opposite. When a prosecutor cant come to a conclusion based on the evidence he found no crime. The sooner you understand this the sooner you will accept what is comingMueller did not say that. He said the exact opposite.
Moron. You don’t have to prove your stupidity to us any more. We knew a long time ago that you were a bumbling, blathering idiot.
He’s my President
I thought he said the exact opposite? Poor kunty."At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state."
JFCHe can't save you boomer...only Christ can. Here's what the Master said about worrying over someone else's Salvation;
"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye".
Matthew 7:5 (NIV)
Lol.It is very obvious. Trumpers have gone from "no contacts with Russians" to today "Mueller isn't prosecuting any crimes and the AG has exonerated him" while totally ignoring ethics and the responsibility of government, including the executive branch. The report is damning but Trumpers will continue to ignore and spin the little bit they can. Not worth arguing or responding to them, imo.
Not even a little. As I said when this charade began, Trump’s win benefitted Russia in the exact manner we see. It was the most polarizing thing to occur in our nation since the civil rights debate. Our country being at each other’s throat is great for Russia because it makes in ineffective as a nation. The Dem’s mandate to resist is good for Russia. So, no, it’s not shocking that Putin understands the psyche of liberals inability to handle adversity of though and opinion counter to their own.How about the clear fact Russian efforts were directed towards helping Trump win? The why doesn’t concern you at all?
Why are you worried as much about if he is or isn't (Christian) instead of yourself?
He’s my President
Yeah, it’s not like people like you are claiming liberals as the boogie man for all wrongs or anything. Jeez.Not even a little. As I said when this charade began, Trump’s win benefitted Russia in the exact manner we see. It was the most polarizing thing to occur in our nation since the civil rights debate. Our country being at each other’s throat is great for Russia because it makes in ineffective as a nation. The Dem’s mandate to resist is good for Russia. So, no, it’s not shocking that Putin understands the psyche of liberals inability to handle adversity of though and opinion counter to their own.
Integrity is what concerns me with my representativesOh I get it now boom, if Trump were following Christian morals you'd be all for him right? [eyeroll]
![]()
Of course that’s what you see. You were conditioned to believe compromise was the GOP giving in to the left’s desires.Yeah, it’s not like people like you are claiming liberals as the boogie man for all wrongs or anything. Jeez.
Even still, by your own post, I’d still be concerned with the why. If you are correct, then the most important thing for us as a nation is to understand and work with one another. But yet, even our President has no interest in that - don’t just blame the resistance. And I see very little flexibility of thought or desire for compromise on the OT from conservatives.....other than abandoning their principles to win.
Integrity is what concerns me with my representatives
Of course that’s what you see. You were conditioned to believe compromise was the GOP giving in to the left’s desires.
Nah, I pulled my vote for big O because he wasn’t compromising to get things done.Of course that’s what you see. You were conditioned to believe compromise was the GOP giving in to the left’s desires.
Nah, I pulled my vote for big O because he wasn’t compromising to get things done.
What about Mayor Buttiplu.....I mean Buttigieg?I'm prepared to vote for Starbucks unless the Dems pulls their heads out of their asses and nominate someone that makes sense.
What about Mayor Buttiplu.....I mean Buttigieg?
I mean the first openly gay candidate with a chance, and his last name.....jeez1) Some of his policies stances I couldn't go along with.
2) His last name.