Has it not been documented that in the Steele document they used Russian Intelligence to compile some of material? Since the Clinton campaign paid for this document, does it not prove that they interacted with the Russians on opposition research?
OT: Roger Stone .... no bueno
- Thread starter Mountaineer Gooch
- Start date
Has it not been documented that in the Steele document they used Russian Intelligence to compile some of material? Since the Clinton campaign paid for this document, does it not prove that they interacted with the Russians on opposition research?
He's lying, and Bru is too.
Search OT forum for those if you need the proof.
With an audience outside of people not usually on the OT board, I will not go into the details. However, you are lying, the inference was made, in tone and nature.
But is not speculation. This was documented in London during another investigation concerning Steele. That is the only real connection that has been proven.
Yesterday you were attacking teenage boys and calling the white supremacists despite that being debunked. Today you are openly defending a big time racist on this board in countryroads89. Shame on you.
More than one person on this board has called the Cov. Cath kids racists or wearing racist clothing (which makes them racists-however subtle) and nothing they can say except to back off and apologize to the kids and recant their statements can solve that. Every day that passes more and more disturbing things comes out about Phillips and the MSM buries in corrections to old stories but never changes the headlines or the smearing of the kids.
Totally agree. When countryroads89 inferred that a member of this board was a house n word many on here said they would forget if he apologized and admit that what he did was in poor taste. Instead of doing that he doubled down on it and proceeded to claim that he was a black man, which was proven to be a lie.
At the same time they have no problem throwing around the racist accusation at anyone.
You better make sure your own house is in order before you call people idiots. I would love to know what you're doing with your life. Considering your history as a known liar, I doubt you would tell the truth.
Even more ludicrous, he made that reference towards ATL twice. The first time he was called out on it as well, just not to the level the second was. I didn't see the first one before today.
LOL!
Oh sweety, no need to start comparing assets and net worth. It would only end in another huge disappointment for you.
First....when was a IC put in place to investigate the Clintons dealing with the Russians in spite of the fact that evidence is on record that they did.
Second.....even if Trump AND the Clintons did....what is the crime? All Mueller is getting are crimes like lying,tampering and obstruction that are rooted in his investigation. He also uncovered some crimes that have absolutely nothing to do with Trump or Russian collusion.
Whose signature is on the seven count indictment?
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthe...34c762c3e142f844c2b/optimized/full.pdf#page=1
Just accept the fact that you do not and will never have a clue and things will be easier. Rhee is prosecuting the case. Mueller would perhaps prosecute one case but that is unlikely.
He is the special prosecutor clown. He isnt the lead prosecutor on the cases.
Did the prosecutor single-handedly indict on the charges? I thought that was a grand jury that did that based on evidence provided. Who cares who the prosecutor voted for or supported in an election? It's not like the prosecutor is the advocate for the defendant.
No prosecutor ahould have a conflict if interest in a case simple for transparency sake. There are other prosecutors in the office who could do it just as well without the conflict.
What is the conflict of interest? Seriously? The job of the prosecutor is to seek a judgement against the defendant. What difference does it make if the person seeking that judgement supported the same candidate for public office over 2 years ago?
Her job is seek punishment for the crimes for which he has been indicted. How is a difference in political opinion a conflict of interest in that pursuit? You're going to have to lay this out for me, because I'm missing it. If she were the presiding judge, maybe you have a claim. As the prosecutor, I think you are grasping at straws.
Well if it isnt obvious to you I really dont know if I can help. A prosector who didnt work for the candidate who was who she represented prior to her role as a prosecutor who was also allegedly the victim of the crime Stone is accused of in the case, would be a better option. The first time anything comes up in trial that can be spun as prisecutorial misconduct already has a built in intent.
I thought the charges were free from any charges related to the election. These are all procedural crimes - perjury, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. I fail to see how this prosecutor has to recuse herself from this case based on her political opinions.
You can be as obstinate as you choose to be. I cant make you see the obvious. Its your integrity.