Toggle sidebar

Another win for President Trump....

bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,041
1,765
113
The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion Wednesday supporting President Trump’s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general.
In its opinion, the Office of Legal Counsel said that the president’s appointment of Whitaker to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was consistent with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
bornaneer said:
The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion Wednesday supporting President Trump’s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general.
In its opinion, the Office of Legal Counsel said that the president’s appointment of Whitaker to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was consistent with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998.
Click to expand...
Oh. Well no need for a 3rd branch of government.
 
M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
WVUCOOPER said:
Oh. Well no need for a 3rd branch of government.
Click to expand...

Dems can sue, and then the courts can decide if the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998 covers the President's action. Hence, your 3rd branch at work.
 
B

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Yeah, I don’t think it’s a “win” to ignore confirmation. How long will he be “acting AG”? Why can’t Trump just send his new pick to the hill to be confirmed?
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Mntneer said:
Dems can sue, and then the courts can decide if the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998 covers the President's action. Hence, your 3rd branch at work.
Click to expand...
Almost like that was my point. Looks like Maryland is suing. I love how even this is now a dems thing, nevermind all the conservative legal scholars that have issues with this.
 
W

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Personally, I respect the DOJ position. However, it is very dangerous. It opens the door to improper actions which could lead to a constitutional crisis. Let's hope Trump doesn't order the AG to restrict Mueller or otherwise cross a line of interference.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,041
1,765
113
WVUBRU said:
Personally, I respect the DOJ position. However, it is very dangerous. It opens the door to improper actions which could lead to a constitutional crisis. Let's hope Trump doesn't order the AG to restrict Mueller or otherwise cross a line of interference.
Click to expand...
Trump could have ordered both Sessions and Rosenstein to restrict Mueller if he had wanted.......I think it's a little late in the investigation for Trump to give that order.
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Another brilliant roll out from the most competent administration in history! lol. Why are all these winners so angry us losers don't agree with them?
 
M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
bornaneer said:
Trump could have ordered both Sessions and Rosenstein to restrict Mueller if he had wanted.......I think it's a little late in the investigation for Trump to give that order.
Click to expand...

Trump's not going to order a stop to the Mueller investigate, but I would wager he wants people to think he well.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,864
286
83
bornaneer said:
The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion Wednesday supporting President Trump’s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general.
In its opinion, the Office of Legal Counsel said that the president’s appointment of Whitaker to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was consistent with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998.
Click to expand...
How is it a win when Trump tells the DOJ to write an "opinion" that supports his actions? That's just the DOJ's "opinion", bravo. There is at least one lawsuit pending so try to relax because nothing has been decided yet.
 
S

Spocker

Redshirt
Jan 26, 2004
3,496
8
0
bornaneer said:
Trump could have ordered both Sessions and Rosenstein to restrict Mueller if he had wanted.......I think it's a little late in the investigation for Trump to give that order.
Click to expand...
Correct.....since Da mulears investigation is in the summation stage what is the lazy Libs real issue
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
It’s an “acting” or temporary position. Who was he going to nominate instead? Rod Rosenstein? Hahahaha that wasn’t going to work.
Click to expand...
Why did he fire the one he had? lol, this administration couldn't lead water down a drain.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
DvlDog4WVU said:
It’s an “acting” or temporary position. Who was he going to nominate instead? Rod Rosenstein? Hahahaha that wasn’t going to work.
Click to expand...
Why not? That does seem what most of the conservative legal scholars think would have been the right move. I for one don't have a clue and will wait for a ruling from the judiciary branch of government.
 
B

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Boomboom521 said:
A lot can happen at the DOJ in 200 days. He’s been softening the ground for removing Seasions for months.....his team couldn’t have vetted someone by now
Click to expand...
With all the Bullsh1t flying around these days, I’d want my new AG confirmed ASAP so I can clear the air and govern
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,357
3,496
113
WVUCOOPER said:
Why not? That does seem what most of the conservative legal scholars think would have been the right move. I for one don't have a clue and will wait for a ruling from the judiciary branch of government.
Click to expand...
Yea, sure, put the guy who reportedly said he was going to record the President in order to invoke the 25th in as interim. Makes a ton of sense. I’m not arguing that it’s constitutionally permitted or that it isn’t. I’m merely saying Rod Rosenstein wasn’t the guy. If the argument was to have someone who’d been confirmed in the position, then he could grab 1 of 100 unknown confirmed personnel that would fit the mold. It isn’t going to be Rod Rosenstein under any circumstance. This charade is about over.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,357
3,496
113
Boomboom521 said:
With all the Bullsh1t flying around these days, I’d want my new AG confirmed ASAP so I can clear the air and govern
Click to expand...
He’s going to wipe out the DOJ and finish off the FBI and rebuild both. Just need a little bit more to come out. He tipped his hand a little last week in his comments about Obama, or did he? We’ll see.

Soon!!!!!
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
DvlDog4WVU said:
He’s going to wipe out the DOJ and finish off the FBI and rebuild both. Just need a little bit more to come out. He tipped his hand a little last week in his comments about Obama, or did he? We’ll see.

Soon!!!!!
Click to expand...

That was the rumor nearly a year ago. I gave up already.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Boomboom521 said:
A lot can happen at the DOJ in 200 days. He’s been softening the ground for removing Seasions for months.....his team couldn’t have vetted someone by now
Click to expand...

Sure. But by law they didn't have to. Just because they don't do what you want doesn't mean it's not right.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
DvlDog4WVU said:
Yea, sure, put the guy who reportedly said he was going to record the President in order to invoke the 25th in as interim. Makes a ton of sense. I’m not arguing that it’s constitutionally permitted or that it isn’t. I’m merely saying Rod Rosenstein wasn’t the guy. If the argument was to have someone who’d been confirmed in the position, then he could grab 1 of 100 unknown confirmed personnel that would fit the mold. It isn’t going to be Rod Rosenstein under any circumstance. This charade is about over.
Click to expand...
lol. Fire Rosenstein and grab the guy behind him.

"I’m not arguing that it’s constitutionally permitted"

I don't even know how to begin.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
DvlDog4WVU said:
He’s going to wipe out the DOJ and finish off the FBI and rebuild both. Just need a little bit more to come out. He tipped his hand a little last week in his comments about Obama, or did he? We’ll see.

Soon!!!!!
Click to expand...
lol. Q
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,563
7,643
113
WVUBRU said:
Personally, I respect the DOJ position. However, it is very dangerous. It opens the door to improper actions which could lead to a constitutional crisis. Let's hope Trump doesn't order the AG to restrict Mueller or otherwise cross a line of interference.
Click to expand...

I hope just he tells Mueller to put up or shut down! If he's got any evidence of "collusion" let's hear it? Otherwise stop wasting the taxpayers's money! How long does it take to prove something everyone on the Left is convinced not only happened, but was done openly and brazenly? Sort of like stealing votes after all the election results are in?[eyeroll]
 
Last edited:
O

Original Mountaineer1

Sophomore
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
bornaneer said:
The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion Wednesday supporting President Trump’s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general.
In its opinion, the Office of Legal Counsel said that the president’s appointment of Whitaker to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was consistent with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (VRA) of 1998.
Click to expand...

LMAO! It is Trump's DOJ. He would fire all of them if they went against him.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,041
1,765
113
moe said:
How is it a win when Trump tells the DOJ to write an "opinion" that supports his actions? That's just the DOJ's "opinion", bravo. There is at least one lawsuit pending so try to relax because nothing has been decided yet.
Click to expand...
You idiot.....you actually think that the SCOTUS will rule against Trump? Remember...."elections have consequences"
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
bornaneer said:
You idiot.....you actually think that the SCOTUS will rule against Trump? Remember...."elections have consequences"
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting the Supreme Court is so partisan they will begin to ignore the constitution? Yikes. That's some hot take.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom