All Christians both possess and appreciate asses of the opposite sex you charlatan. They just don't make the mistake of admiring the aesthetic beauty of an *** for acting like one.
Another potential nominee down the drain
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
All Christians both possess and appreciate asses of the opposite sex you charlatan. They just don't make the mistake of admiring the aesthetic beauty of an *** for acting like one.
Tell your preacher that.....see what he says.....I feel for your wife and the things she puts up with your adulterous lifestyle.....
I speak with him often. Maybe next time I see him I'll ask him if he's ever heard of a Christian who has no testimony? Probably doesn't have a Pastor either.
The latter wouldn't shock him since the former is true.
Hey, I'm not the one who's cheated or cheating on my wife.......I'll ask my pastor to pray for your wife......
So who was that Transvestite you were spotted with the other day?
Say Dude...you sweet on @MountaineerWV ?
I don't run people out of restaurants, refuse to see certain people in my office. I pon't go around wearing a ***** hat on my head. My problem with her is,
1. She told her therapist that there were 4 in the room.
2. Now she claims her therapist's wrote it down wrong, try believing that her therapist wrote down the wrong number, and changed her story to just two.
3. Nobody has claimed to remember them being at any party together
4. She claims to have had many, many sexual partners and he claims to be a virgin until after several years in college.
It's just too many inconsistencies to be believable. If you can't give a time, place or when, there is nothing to investigate.
Please tell me how her therapist wrote down 4 people and now Ford claims there were 2 and that her therapist wrote down the wrong number. With 4 in the room, it's no longer he said/she said. This is all calculated. Do you think her therapist wrote it down wrong or that Ford is lying?
Dude let me ask you a few questions... seriously (I know you'll lie, but I'll ask them anyway)
How do you know I'm Married? What proof do you have? If you don't know for sure I'm Married, how do you know I'm telling the Truth when I say I am? If you don't know if I'm telling the Truth, how do you know I'm cheating on my Wife?
So do you just automatically assume things with no actual proof backing up your charges? If that's true (it is) could this explain why you're such an inconsolable, insolent, ignominious Leftist who believes nothing but lies based on zero facts or only whatever is made up in your head?
Could that be the real Truth about you? (and the rest of the Left)
Last edited:
Dude let me ask you a few questions... seriously (I know you'll lie, but I'll ask them anyway)
How do you know I'm Married? What proof do you have? If you don't know for sure I'm Married, how do you know I'm telling the Truth when I say I am? If you don't know if I'm telling the Truth, how do you know I'm cheating on my Wife?
So do you just automatically assume things with no actual proof backing up your charges? If that's true (it is) could this explain why you're such an inconsolable, insolent, ignominious Leftist who believes nothing but lies based on zero facts or only whatever is made up in your head?
Could that be the real Truth about you?
Well, you are an adulterer.......so.........
OK...let's say it's true. How do you know this? Suppose you were asked for your proof? What would you offer?
(que your lies btw):stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
See, I know you're a liar, and I have the proof. Your posts! [winking]
Ok, deny it.........opcorn:
Even if I did how would you know I'm telling the Truth? I don't want to be a liar like you, or present unsubstantiated evidence no one like you on the Left would believe. So why don't you have the FBI come in and investigate me since it's your charge? I'll testify under oath, then sue your lyin' *** for slander.[winking]
You know ole Earl is having a bad day when he has to make up one of his lies. Typical liberal.
He accuses me of being an adulterer, but I happen to think he's into Transvestites. Even parades around as one!:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
@MountaineerWV in Yellow
Ok, deny it.........
I cheat on my Wife, and lie about both. Now, what do you say is the Truth?
You say you're a Christian, and lie about it. Isn't that True?
Which part is a lie?
That's a pretty simple mistake, right? Four others at the party, 2 in the room with her. It's am easy mistake.
I can't explain the party issue, but the 100 kegs or bust crew had several, I would suspect. Not all of them are going to be memorable for everyone.
Judge would have a vested interest in saying no such event happened, guilty as an accomplice if true.
Were the claims of her exploits hers or something someone threw up on the internet. Regardless, she could choose to sleep with a ton of people and still be assaulted by someone she didn't agree to sleep with.
Pretty sure she said there was at least three in the room. Judge knocked him off of her and then she ran into the bathroom and they stumbled down the steps. Now, her therapist's notes said 4 in the room. Now she says two. Pretty large inconsistency right there. Claims her therapist wrote it down wrong. I highly doubt that. She has not implicated Judge, she claims he knocked him off her. Now she claims he wasn't there. Repressed memory? Highly undependable. The problem with all this, the senate is supposed to trying to find out if he's intellectually gifted enough for the sC, this is not anything else. Liberals have turned it into a circus, like they always do. Kagan was highly unqualified but the Repub held their nose and treated her with respect. Liberals are in death throes right now. Lashing out at everybody, from restaurants, to wall street to anybody a conservative nominates. I'm hoping the Repubs put their collective foot down and vote.
Don't be anti American, I know it's hard. By the way, refute what I posted.
I’m not wasting my time. You have obviously demonstrated you have no reading comprehension.
That's rich.You tell a person allegedly with no reading comprehension to "don't be stupid"
? So if the person you're accusing of not having any reading comprehension can't read, why are you telling them not to be stupid? Why not just suggest they learn how to read? Why even write to someone who can't read what you're suggesting?
Isn't that like really really really stupid?
I guess we likely get to separate fact from fiction tomorrow. When is Avenatti’s big bombshell?