Kavenaugh next steps

[WVUCOOPER]

The timing of all of this is meant to do one thing. Delay the appointment until after the mid-terms with Dems hopinge they take the Senate and derail Kavanaugh completely.

Her testifying... pointless. Kavanaugh testifying to refute... pointless. It's a he said she said about an event that happened over 35 years ago between 2 teens. It's going nowhere.

Give her until Monday and either **** or get off the pot.

I think it's more than just a delay tactic. Especially since the Dems aren't taking the Senate and this issue would probably hurt several dems up for re-election in red states this year, including our own dipshit.

IMO, this is about Roe v Wade and future elections. It's the long game. I already thought it was stupid for the GOP to overturn Roe v. Wade with all male justices, but now one is going to be painted as an attempted rapist? Dude already had low approval numbers. They (dems) can (will) run on a stolen seat, all males overturning Roe and an unpopular, clouded judge for the next decade or so.

 

[jpoppa]

I think it is disgraceful to use inappropriate language to describe a potential victim when the facts aren't known. But regardless, very little expectations of many as it pertains to class is had by me. Regardless, all this playing out in public and in the media is nothing more than a political game and it is disgusting in my eye. The GOP is desperate to seat someone like Kavenaugh before the election and the Dems are even more desperate to delay. Other than a few individuals on either side in the political game seem sincere on whether or not this story is valid as the potential victim has recounted it. Everyone else is playing political football and the losers are the American public in addition to the reputation of both individuals. Let's just hope no crazy person attempts to take matters in their own hands as the leaders of this country are more interested in dividing the country with fear and rhetoric than doing what is right.

lol

 

[dave]

Nothing is wrong unless there is something to hide. They simply don't want Kavenaugh to talk to the FBI on this subject. Just like they don't want Trump to talk to the Special Council on that investigation.

The delay tactics by the Dems is nothing compared to the hypocrisy, lies and closed minded attitude of the GOP. Especially looking at some of these same GOP senators and their demands for a FBI investigation of the Anita Hill allegations against Thomas. Now they lie and say it isn't possible or needed, depending on what day it is and what lie they are putting forth.

Hahahahaha. Wow.

 

[Mntneer]

I think it's more than just a delay tactic. Especially since the Dems aren't taking the Senate and this issue would probably hurt several dems up for re-election in red states this year, including our own dipshit.

IMO, this is about Roe v Wade and future elections. It's the long game. I already thought it was stupid for the GOP to overturn Roe v. Wade with all male justices, but now one is going to be painted as an attempted rapist? Dude already had low approval numbers. They (dems) can (will) run on a stolen seat, all males overturning Roe and an unpopular, clouded judge for the next decade or so.

What the Dems are not paying attention to is some of other candidates Trump passed over in picking Kavanaugh. If they derail Kavanaugh they may regret it post mid-term, as they could find themselves watching Trump put someone on the court that's far to the right of Kavanaugh.

Nothing is wrong unless there is something to hide. They simply don't want Kavenaugh to talk to the FBI on this subject. Just like they don't want Trump to talk to the Special Council on that investigation.

The delay tactics by the Dems is nothing compared to the hypocrisy, lies and closed minded attitude of the GOP. Especially looking at some of these same GOP senators and their demands for a FBI investigation of the Anita Hill allegations against Thomas. Now they lie and say it isn't possible or needed, depending on what day it is and what lie they are putting forth.

FBI has already performed background investigations. They've already talked to dozens and dozens of people from his past. To think them conducting yet another background check (which is what it would, not a criminal investigation) and think that it would come out different is absurd.

 

[WVUBRU]

FBI has already performed background investigations. They've already talked to dozens and dozens of people from his past. To think them conducting yet another background check (which is what it would, not a criminal investigation) and think that it would come out different is absurd.

Yes, they have done 6 background checks in the history of Kavenaugh if I'm not mistaken. But that doesn't mean they have investigated this incident. Come on, you are smarter than the crap you write. It isn't absurd at all to think and understand this instance was not in the scope of previous FBI investigations. There is no proof the FBI spoke to anyone related to this instance, there is no filing of any sort on the instance, there is basically nothing but a meeting 6 years ago between the accuser, husband and therapist that the public is aware of. And that meeting wouldn't be in a FBI investigation due to privilege.

 

[dave]

Yes, they have done 6 background checks in the history of Kavenaugh if I'm not mistaken. But that doesn't mean they have investigated this incident. Come on, you are smarter than the crap you write. It isn't absurd at all to think and understand this instance was not in the scope of previous FBI investigations. There is no proof the FBI spoke to anyone related to this instance, there is no filing of any sort on the instance, there is basically nothing but a meeting 6 years ago between the accuser, husband and therapist that the public is aware of. And that meeting wouldn't be in a FBI investigation due to privilege.

Speaking of no proof....there is no proof of the incident at all.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

What the Dems are not paying attention to is some of other candidates Trump passed over in picking Kavanaugh. If they derail Kavanaugh they may regret it post mid-term, as they could find themselves watching Trump put someone on the court that's far to the right of Kavanaugh.

Not really sure what far to the right of Kavanaugh means? Again, this feels more like a long game play by the dems, as opposed to short term. They are going to run against Trump and the GOP taking away Roe and prior conditions (possibly). Another reason it was mind boggling to me that Trump picked a white male for this seat.

 

[JWG66]

To me, this is similar to what happened th Bob McDonald. Weaponize the justice process, tie up and trash a public figure, drain their family finances, and take power from the voters. Virginia has had Dem Governors since.

BTW - the Supreme Court voted unanimously that he committed no crime. But the damage was done and lasting. Typical, the press barely reported his innocence.

If this can be done to a Supreme Court nominee it can be done to your dad, your son, a husband. Just sexually slander the person that is up for promotion or election and ask for a year to sort it out. The press will convict em public ally in the meantime.

 

[Airport]

Yes, they have done 6 background checks in the history of Kavenaugh if I'm not mistaken. But that doesn't mean they have investigated this incident. Come on, you are smarter than the crap you write. It isn't absurd at all to think and understand this instance was not in the scope of previous FBI investigations. There is no proof the FBI spoke to anyone related to this instance, there is no filing of any sort on the instance, there is basically nothing but a meeting 6 years ago between the accuser, husband and therapist that the public is aware of. And that meeting wouldn't be in a FBI investigation due to privilege.

Please reread your statement, there is no reason for any investigation by anyone. She can offer nothing concrete at all. You do not investigate something that has no beginning, no end, no location. This claim is pretty weak, very thin ice to quote from Lethal Weapon.

 

[Airport]

To me, this is similar to what happened th Bob McDonald. Weaponize the justice process, tie up and trash a public figure, drain their family finances, and take power from the voters. Virginia has had Dem Governors since.

BTW - the Supreme Court voted unanimously that he committed no crime. But the damage was done and lasting. Typical, the press barely reported his innocence.

If this can be done to a Supreme Court nominee it can be done to your dad, your son, a husband. Just sexually slander the person that is up for promotion or election and ask for a year to sort it out. The press will convict em public ally in the meantime.

Bob's wife was the problem.

 

[Airport]

Not really sure what far to the right of Kavanaugh means? Again, this feels more like a long game play by the dems, as opposed to short term. They are going to run against Trump and the GOP taking away Roe and prior conditions (possibly). Another reason it was mind boggling to me that Trump picked a white male for this seat.

I thought he would go with the female myself.

 

[Mntneer]

Not really sure what far to the right of Kavanaugh means? Again, this feels more like a long game play by the dems, as opposed to short term. They are going to run against Trump and the GOP taking away Roe and prior conditions (possibly). Another reason it was mind boggling to me that Trump picked a white male for this seat.

There's that one woman, the Catholic, that Trump had on his list.

Yes, they have done 6 background checks in the history of Kavenaugh if I'm not mistaken. But that doesn't mean they have investigated this incident. Come on, you are smarter than the crap you write. It isn't absurd at all to think and understand this instance was not in the scope of previous FBI investigations. There is no proof the FBI spoke to anyone related to this instance, there is no filing of any sort on the instance, there is basically nothing but a meeting 6 years ago between the accuser, husband and therapist that the public is aware of. And that meeting wouldn't be in a FBI investigation due to privilege.

If over the course of 6 investigations, not a single person said, "You know... I do remember hearing about a high school party where Bret got a little touchy with this girl.....30 some years ago....." Then another investigation is not going to shed any more light on this he said she said.

The delay in bring her story forward was timed to purposely create the cry of "we need another investigation" to push that investigation beyond the midterms and delay the nomination. If this were a Bill Cosby, Harvey Wienstein story, where numbers of woman were coming forward, then hell yeah... investigate, but in this case, 6 previous investigations was enough.

 

[JWG66]

Bob's wife was the problem.

But he was charged too.

 

[WVUBRU]

Please reread your statement, there is no reason for any investigation by anyone. She can offer nothing concrete at all. You do not investigate something that has no beginning, no end, no location. This claim is pretty weak, very thin ice to quote from Lethal Weapon.

You and your brethren continue to say the same unknown. No matter how many times you state the lie your side puts out, it is simply unknown whether or not this accusation has any merit or not. So, why not investigate in order to get rid of any cloud of doubt? Answer is the GOP cannot allow an investigation and still have a chance in hell of putting Kavenaugh on the bench.

 

[dave]

You and your brethren continue to say the same unknown. No matter how many times you state the lie your side puts out, it is simply unknown whether or not this accusation has any merit or not. So, why not investigate in order to get rid of any cloud of doubt? Answer is the GOP cannot allow an investigation and still have a chance in hell of putting Kavenaugh on the bench.

Speaking of saying a lie. Keep telling the lie about a lie.

 

[Mntneer]

So, why not investigate in order to get rid of any cloud of doubt? Answer is the GOP cannot allow an investigation and still have a chance in hell of putting Kavenaugh on the bench.

Because it's pointless. Until she testifies and he testifies it's pointless.

And should an investigation go forth, he'll still be put on the court barring him admitting that he did it.

It's time to **** or get off the pot.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

There's that one woman, the Catholic, that Trump had on his list.



.

He should have picked from a list of 3-4 females. Or at least picked the female. Now they get to run on President Grabsthembythepussy and all male Justices (including predatory Bret) overturning Roe and possibly striking down prior conditions. Less than ideal, imo.

 

[dave]

He should have picked from a list of 3-4 females. Or at least picked the female. Now they get to run on President Grabsthembythepussy and all male Justices (including predatory Bret) overturning Roe and possibly striking down prior conditions. Less than ideal, imo.

Predatory Bret? Poor cnncooptdsRIP

 

[Mntneer]

He should have picked from a list of 3-4 females. Or at least picked the female. Now they get to run on President Grabsthembythepussy and all male Justices (including predatory Bret) overturning Roe and possibly striking down prior conditions. Less than ideal, imo.

I don't think people vote as heavily on Roe as the politicians want us to believe that they do.

 

[Airport]

You and your brethren continue to say the same unknown. No matter how many times you state the lie your side puts out, it is simply unknown whether or not this accusation has any merit or not. So, why not investigate in order to get rid of any cloud of doubt? Answer is the GOP cannot allow an investigation and still have a chance in hell of putting Kavenaugh on the bench.

Again, you do not investigate anything that can't be proved. Why are you so dense. She can't say where it happened or when it happened. Most reasonable people would look at those two statements and wonder if it happened at all. She has been invited to speak Monday. She's has accomplished an incredible resume for herself. She is no shrinking violet that has to be treated like a 6 year old. Put on your big girl panties and testify or STFU.

 

[Airport]

He should have picked from a list of 3-4 females. Or at least picked the female. Now they get to run on President Grabsthembythepussy and all male Justices (including predatory Bret) overturning Roe and possibly striking down prior conditions. Less than ideal, imo.

There are conservative female judges that would probably say that preexisting should be reversed and also Roe.

 

[WVUBRU]

Until she testifies and he testifies it's pointless.

Aren't you one of the brighter ones in this thread on your side that said it is nothing but a he said/she said? So why now are you advocating her to testifify without any investigation of the instance and presented with some context by professionals? Nice flip-flop.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Predatory Bret? Poor cnncooptdsRIP

I see you haven’t followed the thread. Shocking

 

[WVUCOOPER]

I don't think people vote as heavily on Roe as the politicians want us to believe that they do.

Guess we’ll find out. I think that’s hot garbage. No way Trump could have nominated a judge that wouldn’t overturn.

 

[WVUBRU]

Again, you do not investigate anything that can't be proved

Simply ******** and expose you as a fool that knows nothing.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

There are conservative female judges that would probably say that preexisting should be reversed and also Roe.

Isn’t that the point I’m making in this thread?

 

[eerdoc]

I would guess about 30 million women.

Surely doubt that!
There may be a few women who are so weak as to jump on a band sago that has no firm base and lacks real fact/evidence. She MAY have experienced such an event with SOMEONE, SOMETIME (her classmate alludes to this type behavior being common place within their community {CNN interview}) but that does not provide basis for what is currently happening. Most intelligent, thinking, reasonable women will, if anything, be repulsed by such an obvious, contrived, hollow attempt at a political action.

 

[dave]

I see you haven’t followed the thread. Shocking

Sorry if I dont read many of your posts. I have limited time and I stick to people who have something to say.

 

[Boomboom521]

I don't think people vote as heavily on Roe as the politicians want us to believe that they do.

Women do

 

[dave]

I don't think people vote as heavily on Roe as the politicians want us to believe that they do.

You think? Sarcasm aside you are correct. Roe has become the equivalent of election year "republicans want to take grandmas social security."

 

[Boomboom521]

Sorry if I dont read many of your posts. I have limited time and I stick to people who have something to say.

Yet most of what you say is just old grumpy nastiness

 

[dave]

Yet most of what you say is just old grumpy nastiness

Irony lives.

 

[Airport]

Simply ******** and expose you as a fool that knows nothing.

No, there are many law enforcement people who agree with that premise. You cannot investigate anything that has no place to start.

 

[Airport]

Women do

Only sluts and whores. Nice girls don't. [roll]

 

[CpEER]

I’m sure this tweet is fake, but it certainly wouldn’t surprise me.

Hahahahaha

 

[WVUBRU]

No, there are many law enforcement people who agree with that premise. You cannot investigate anything that has no place to start.

There is a place to start. You don't want to acknowledge her accusation at all.

Your mind is set. I'm done on this subject. Continue on.

 

[rog1187]

Nothing is wrong unless there is something to hide. They simply don't want Kavenaugh to talk to the FBI on this subject. Just like they don't want Trump to talk to the Special Council on that investigation.

The delay tactics by the Dems is nothing compared to the hypocrisy, lies and closed minded attitude of the GOP. Especially looking at some of these same GOP senators and their demands for a FBI investigation of the Anita Hill allegations against Thomas. Now they lie and say it isn't possible or needed, depending on what day it is and what lie they are putting forth.

What is the FBI going to ask him - there is no date or location to even begin with from what I understand. He had already denied it publicly. She’s been given her time and so far she has declined. #timesup

 

[Airport]

There is a place to start. You don't want to acknowledge her accusation at all.

Your mind is set. I'm done on this subject. Continue on.

You cannot investigate anything that you cannot say when or where it happened 30 years ago. If you are convinced it happened, that's your prerogative. I guess all the women who have come forward to accuse him give weight to your belief. Oh wait, there hasn't been anybody has there?

 

[Keyser76]

look at Trumps rubes pretending if Kavanaugh was Obamas nominee they would be acting the same, delayed anything for Merrick Garland for how long? but now we gotta hurry this one? Ya'lls hypocrisy knows no bounds. Why worry, the Red Wave will cement his chances, lmfao.

 

[JWG66]

You cannot investigate anything that you cannot say when or where it happened 30 years ago. If you are convinced it happened, that's your prerogative. I guess all the women who have come forward to accuse him give weight to your belief. Oh wait, there hasn't been anybody has there?

65 wrote letter to support him. That should count for something. Just amazes me how Bill did more than fondle and Teddy killed a young woman and there were no Dem cries for FBI investigations