I'm sorry to say you and others are not seeing the entire picture. Yes, logistically a tournament style playoff could work. No argument. But the college presidents, conferences, the NCAA, the various cities that bowls are located in and the actual bowls committees including sponsors and charities, TV networks are all against the idea. It is too impactful as there will be winners and losers in changing. The lower bowls will disappear. The top tier bowls will also cease to exist as you know them. It will turn into March Madness where a few cities get the pre-championship games and the Championship game will rotate between about 8 cities. Now there are about 62 teams going to post-season bowl games to many cities across the country. Changing will make the regular season pretty insignificant as once out of the playoff race (and most conferences will have little chance of making it anyway), their season has nothing to play for. Fans interest will go down, pressure on coaches goes through the roof. This is exactly what is happening with basketball currently making the regular season of 4 1/2 months basically nothing more than a warmup to March Madness. Only benefit is there will be a team holding the trophy that won 4 or 5 extra games in a row. That is important to some fans; not as important to the other parties listed above.