Can someone on the Left explain this to me?
Often you all argue that a 3 year old kid who thinks they're the opposite Sex should have the right without their Parent's interference to change their genetic makeup and become whatever their "natural desire" is. Say a little Boy who thinks he's really a Girl or vice-versa right? Don't restrict them right?
Yet you all are bent over in anger now with Roy Moore for allegedly "forcing" himself onto Teenaged Girls who were arguably too young & powerless to repulse his advances. Your outrage is based on their innocence and lack of "consent" as minors right? Adults preying on little Children right?
So my question to you all is, what is the "age of consent"? How can you simultaneously argue for little three year olds being allowed to change their sexual orientation, and in fact encouraging them to do so and explore their sexuality when they don't even know what "sex" is? Yet at the same time you seriously argue that a 14 year old has no clue about their sexuality, or the ability to tell a grown Damn *** Man "no"?
Why are 3 year olds more aware of their human sexuality in your World than pre-pubescent Teens?
(this is NOT an argument defending Roy Moore...I genuinely want to know how you all square this dichotomy in your relativistic morality?
Anyone?
btw...we on the Right think BOTH are immoral and wrong.
Often you all argue that a 3 year old kid who thinks they're the opposite Sex should have the right without their Parent's interference to change their genetic makeup and become whatever their "natural desire" is. Say a little Boy who thinks he's really a Girl or vice-versa right? Don't restrict them right?
Yet you all are bent over in anger now with Roy Moore for allegedly "forcing" himself onto Teenaged Girls who were arguably too young & powerless to repulse his advances. Your outrage is based on their innocence and lack of "consent" as minors right? Adults preying on little Children right?
So my question to you all is, what is the "age of consent"? How can you simultaneously argue for little three year olds being allowed to change their sexual orientation, and in fact encouraging them to do so and explore their sexuality when they don't even know what "sex" is? Yet at the same time you seriously argue that a 14 year old has no clue about their sexuality, or the ability to tell a grown Damn *** Man "no"?
Why are 3 year olds more aware of their human sexuality in your World than pre-pubescent Teens?
(this is NOT an argument defending Roy Moore...I genuinely want to know how you all square this dichotomy in your relativistic morality?
Anyone?
btw...we on the Right think BOTH are immoral and wrong.
Last edited: