a lot of fans are sick of losing 7+ games a year.
you, apparently, aren't one of them.
hey, I guess there's always next year (for the 22nd year in a row)!
And it will be the 27th year in a row if we keep changes coaches every 3-4 years.
We hired a legit coaching candidate with other BCS offers for the first time since Osborne retired. He took over for a staff that was 6-12 in there last 18 games with 6 losses by more than 20 points including multiple 30 point losses to unranked teams. Nebraska was legitemately really bad in 2016 and by end of year playing as bad as any team in conference and that was every bit as much about talent as it was coaching. He deserves criticism for some lack of discipline and is unwillingness to appropriately address special team coverage and return teams and need to reduce player turnover a bit. He also deserves 125% of the time necessary to be 100% sure he cannot do the job considering his past accomplishments for NU and the offers he passed up to take on the **** show he inherited from Riley withe the hopes of making his alma mater great again.
Recruiting was truly decimated by multiple coaching changes and the inevitable transition class problems (player fit and settling on players late) for two changes. Throw in that Pelini basically quit recruiting the last year before he was fired and that Riley flat recruited about half the number 5.7 or better players we currently land and missed on a much higher percent to boot. The roster was flat out bottom quarter of big ten.
As a direct result of recruiting and the time it takes to develop lineman Frost has had exactly one line that wasn't big ten below average or bad (2019 line was big ten bad, undebatable), In 2018 with that average line his freshman QB was 12 in total offense and had a 1000 yard receiver and almost a second and the team finished number 2 in total offense in conference. So with decent line and some solid skill players Frost could coach offense which extended back to UCF and Oregon. Then all the sudden he is a complete moron in 2019 and 2020. Yah, that makes sense.
Lets see what Frost and Martinez do with Corcoran, Piper, Jurgen, Benhardt and Nouilis along with Banks and Hixson as likely swing players. I will flat out gaurantee you right now that 2021 is a better 0-line than that senior laiden 2018 group even with one second and two third year guys starting. We recruited some high level athletes (Corcoran, Piper, Benhardt) and absolutely hit a home run with Piper. Kids are just that much better athletes and players and you got a taste of that against Rutgers where an NU line was extremely dominant against a big ten team for first time since 2018.
And before some negative Nancy chimes it that its Rutgers and doesn't matter I would counter that just 1.5 years earlier a bad South Alabama teamed flat out dominated that bad 2019 line, limiting NU to less than 100 yards on 44 carries. That game should have been a sign of just how big ten poor that group was going to be considering it was patched together from the 8 scholorship lineman they had which included a So. walk-on being awarded a scholorship and converted 270 lbs TE, both of which ended up starting. Huh, cannot believe that didn't work in the Big Ten, better fire Allen obviously cannot coach or develop guys.
Offensively, we have been trying to dig out from that o-line mess the last two years and now it appears like we will get to see what a Frost offense looks like with a legit big ten offensive line. By all means if this offensive line group doesn't develop like we expect or we are so bad with turnovers and special teams that we lose regardless that I would get the true fans being ready for a change but we are not to that point yet which makes me question anybody that is as vocal, adamant and annoying about it as you are.
I will make a couple predictions for 2022 which I prefer not do but feel pretty confident about.
Defensively NU will finish in top half of the league in total YPG and based on players back and coaching improvements I would guess around 5th based on trending since 2018. While this won't be a great defense it will be very competitive and more than capable of holding there own.
Offensively, NU is going to finish in the top 4 in total YPG and if I had to guess much closer to first than fourth.
This roster has all the makings of a good football team and the record and scoring will be indicative of that assuming special team return and coverage units aren't horrid like 2020 and turnover margin is at least near break even. I believe this will be about an 8 win team with what they have and the fact I think they will be roughly average on special teams and turnovers. Obvioulsy, record could be better or worse depending on those two factors and injuries.
This is also why I assume they were trying to get out of OU game and are so glad the Illinois game is moved back to states. Even good football teams lose 9+ out of ten to OU and OSU. Getting out of the OU game makes the odds of 8 wins much higher by eliminating a probably loss and replacing it with a probable win. Assuming the team does develop as I have proposed there is also a legit chance they are 5-0 going into the home game with Michigan if they replace OU with a probably win and that type of confident can do amazing things for a team.
My only problem is how is was handled. This athletic department has just done some things poorly from a PR perspective. Proclaiming Jurgens the next Remington when you new he was going to have to play two years where he was underdeveloped and sized. Asking to move this game in a way that could have been made public in any way shape or form is another. It should have been an office visit with Castiglione with and honest question and honest explanation as to why we are asking to go along with a gift of fine Scotch or whatever the hell he likes and whatever future scheduling concessions he wants. Everything is negotiable if you give enough.
Instead it is handles in way were it is not only declined but ends up in paper as a means for OU to prevent NU from pushing the option.