Are we really pretending beating Rutgers was "progress?"

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,518
20,934
113
Looking at conference only stats

Despite hiring an offensive “genius” - points scored per game has decreased each season from 2018 to current

#progress
Still 0% interested in ANYTHING you have to say.
 

mgbreeze

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2004
10,208
3,753
113
Looking at conference only stats

Despite hiring an offensive “genius” - points scored per game has decreased each season from 2018 to current

#progress
Who exactly are you quoting when you use the word genius?
 

mgbreeze

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2004
10,208
3,753
113
+1. Chins serves as a huge meat shield to deflect criticism from Frost. He should have been Frosts best man at his wedding
Disagree. I think they both get plenty of criticism. Are you arguing as we sit here today that Frost is getting less criticism? That's false.
 

19Football19

All-Conference
Dec 2, 2015
2,530
1,060
65
That game determined the literal last place team in the conference.

The media talking like the team finally broke through, because they outlasted a TERRIBLE football team is really something else.
If you listen to the local beat writers and read this board, then yes. If you know sports or anything about football then no. This is an old team that’s very single threaded. Wan’Dale gone after next year. Then a new QB for FIdone for 2 years then he’s gone. The current team is 1 SR away from being the second oldest team in the BIG. Let that sink in.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,926
13,447
78
er next year. Then a new QB for FIdone for 2 years then he’s gone. The current team is 1 SR away from being the second oldest team in the BIG. Let that sink in.
The most talented kids on the Husker team right now are in Frost's last 2 classes. I don't give a sh## how old those seniors will be next year. We're going to be starting 3 underclassmen on our O line and probably 2 junors. A couple of redshirt freshmen at WR and RB. Underclassmen will litter our back 7 on defense next season as well. The most talented guys who will hopefully raise this team up almost all are very young players. It's how it works when you do a complete rebuild. Think of this. Of the guys who leave this year, who are we going to miss? Jaimes and JoJo. That's about it.
 
Last edited:

Wyldcard

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2018
9,727
2,691
0
Rutgers was playing their second or third team QB and had lost three starters at least in the second half!
Look a little deeper, lost 3 starters in the 2nd half. That type of physicality and domintion was the trademark of what the pipeline used to be. They finally physically dominated a team they should've. If we woulda played like this, all year? We win 4 of the 5 we lost. Baby steps, we are slowly getting there. The penalties and TOs need to go way down as we are our own worst enemy.
 
Last edited:

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,475
2,018
113
Whatever you want to believe. No reason to believe we couldn't split wisconsin and Cincinnati (both in lincoln) but that's just me.

And sdsu in lincoln? 70% Right. Pull the other one.

We aren't good. We all get that. 6-6 isn't a stretch.
Are people really this delusional?
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,518
20,934
113
The most talented kids on the Husker team right now are in Frost's last 2 classes. I don't give a sh## how old those seniors will be next year. We're going to be starting 3 underclassmen on our O line and probably 2 junors. A couple of redshirt freshmen at WR and RB. Underclassmen will litter our back 7 on defense next season as well. The most talented guys who will hopefully raise this team up almost all are very young players. It's how it works when you do a complete rebuild. Think of this. Of the guys who leave this year, who are we going to miss? Jaimes and JoJo. That's about it.
Who are the Jr’s on the OL? I think we will most likely start 3 freshmen (Corcoran, Benhart, Piper). And 2 Sophomores (Jurgens and Nouili).
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
That game determined the literal last place team in the conference.

The media talking like the team finally broke through, because they outlasted a TERRIBLE football team is really something else.
I haven't heard or read a single media rep say anything like this. Who are you talking about?

Rutgers was beaten up, playing without their starting QB and had several injured guys playing on defense. They had an injured guy laying on the field seemingly every 5 defensive snaps. They had won an emotional overtime game against their rival only six days prior.

NU has in a GREAT SPOT to play Rutgers and still only won by 7 due once again to sloppy play by the offense and special teams.

It was nice to end with a win, but nobody thinks it was a "break through".
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,518
20,934
113
I haven't heard or read a single media rep say anything like this. Who are you talking about?

Rutgers was beaten up, playing without their starting QB and had several injured guys playing on defense. They had an injured guy laying on the field seemingly every 5 defensive snaps. They had won an emotional overtime game against their rival only six days prior.

NU has in a GREAT SPOT to play Rutgers and still only won by 7 due once again to sloppy play by the offense and special teams.

It was nice to end with a win, but nobody thinks it was a "break through".

Wow. So now we are trying to make creative excuses for our opponents. They had injuries in the second half because we physically beat them up, on the way to 360+ yards rushing. And we also played on Friday. It’s like some people afraid of admitting anything positive happened because they are so invested in bitching about and attacking everything related to this team.
 

Mack In Motion

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
6,008
3,559
113
Rutgers "was missing it's starting QB" in an academic sense only. Vedral stunk this season. Stats and W/L both back that up.

At one point this season he lost his job to the guy that started against us. Rutgers is a poor team and we should have rolled them, but Vedral would have made zero difference in that game.
 

schuele

All-American
Apr 17, 2005
21,124
5,734
0
Rutgers "was missing it's starting QB" in an academic sense only. Vedral stunk this season. Stats and W/L both back that up.

At one point this season he lost his job to the guy that started against us. Rutgers is a poor team and we should have rolled them, but Vedral would have made zero difference in that game.
But, but... tempo.
 

huskernation1973

Redshirt
Sep 26, 2020
303
0
0
Are we making progress, or what Rutgers a one off?

Total Yardage vs.:

Ohio State- 370
Northwestern- 442
Penn State- 298
Illinois- 392
Iowa- 338
Purdue- 364
Minnesota- 308
Rutgers- 620
 

Iroh2

Redshirt
Nov 9, 2019
874
0
0
As long as we recognize that there will never be “progress”... we didn’t like Frank at 10-3 and the rhetoric than was no different than it is now. So unless it is magically 1994-1995 or 1997 we absolutely suck and need to fire everyone. (HuskerNation howled in ‘93 and ‘96) So based on reading this board for 20 years, this year is no better or worse than any year over the past 23 years. That is quite encouraging as Frost can realistically say the only opinion that matters is his and Moos.. The rest of us just like to be mad and don’t even watch for the enjoyment I f the game... we like the “fire somebody” over all else...
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,603
1,373
113
Rutgers "was missing it's starting QB" in an academic sense only. Vedral stunk this season. Stats and W/L both back that up.

At one point this season he lost his job to the guy that started against us. Rutgers is a poor team and we should have rolled them, but Vedral would have made zero difference in that game.
If Mr Martinez doesn't turn the ball over 5 times, I think we win by more than seven. Let's say he only turns it over three times. We'd probably win by 14 to 17
 

Mrs.Jeans15

Heisman
May 5, 2018
25,597
40,940
0
Exactly. The defense has improved each of the 3 years under Chins. But of course, he still gets the most blame.

If it improved we would have more wins.

We beat the worse teams in the conference.

Our defense stil sucks. Be glad Rutgers dropped passes and had their back up.

You are foolish if you think we can win anything with that defense. And they had the upperclassmen.
 

CatColumbia

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2014
5,934
3,140
0
If Mr Martinez doesn't turn the ball over 5 times, I think we win by more than seven. Let's say he only turns it over three times. We'd probably win by 14 to 17

I agree. And to be honest we probably score on that last drive if we didn’t play good sport by taking a knee.
 

Fed-Up

Freshman
Nov 2, 2019
272
66
28
If you assume that we win our 3 preseason games (not a stretch) on our regular season schedule and lose to wisconsin... winning yesterday made us a 6-6 team. Which is a bowl team in a normal year. And an improvement over the last several years.

It's progress. Which is something. You can complain that we aren't as good as we all hope but some of us feel no need to destroy other human beings because they aren't who you hoped they would be.
you know what happens when you assume......
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
Wow. So now we are trying to make creative excuses for our opponents. They had injuries in the second half because we physically beat them up, on the way to 360+ yards rushing. And we also played on Friday. It’s like some people afraid of admitting anything positive happened because they are so invested in bitching about and attacking everything related to this team.
Are you talking to me? Who are these "some people who are "investing in bitching" and "attacking everything related to this team"? Don't be a drama queen. There was nothing in my previous post that was meant to be a "creative excuse" for Rutgers. Rutgers physically got their *** kicked, but the Huskers made so many mistakes that they were lucky to beat anybody that day.