the POTUS just said this week after meeting with the drug companies that a vaccine is very close to coming. I’ll trust our President over the media any day if the week.
Bookmarked and Reported.
the POTUS just said this week after meeting with the drug companies that a vaccine is very close to coming. I’ll trust our President over the media any day if the week.
Hey just an FYI for future reference if needed. You should be able to go to your local large animal vet ( not a doggie and kitty) and get 99% alcohol in gallon jugs. Some may have it in bulk and you can bring in your own jugUm since this seems to be directed to me I'll respond. I do wash my hands. Frequently. However, like most people I have a job and that job doesn't allow me to be constantly washing my hands. I will be flying on a plane. Perhaps I should just stay in the bathroom washing my hands.
I use hand sanitizer when there is no other option. BTW the aloe vera is to prevent your hands from being totally dried out from frequent sanitizing,
OK guys, keep in mind that hospitals prepare for worst-case scenarios. My friend, who is a big Trump supporter sent me this. It gives me no pleasure in posting this. Not sure why he didn't include the slides. Am trying to get them from him.
Leaked Document for U.S. Hospitals Reveals They're Preparing for Millions of Coronavirus-Related Hospitalizations:
Hospitals are bracing for millions of Americans to be hospitalized as part of the novel coronavirus outbreak. The American Hospital Association, which represents thousands of hospitals and health systems, hosted a webinar in February with its member hospitals and health systems. Business Insider obtained a copy of the slides presented.
As part of the presentation to hospitals, Dr. James Lawler, a professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Center gave his "best guess" estimates of how much the virus might spread in the U.S. That included 4.8 million hospitalizations associated with the novel coronavirus, 96 million cases overall in the U.S., and 480,000 deaths. Overall, the slide points out that hospitals should prepare for an impact to the system that's 10 times a severe flu season. The slide does not give a particular time frame.
The American Hospital Association said the webinar reflects the views of the experts who spoke on it, not its own. Lawler isn't alone in anticipating widespread infections. Marc Lipsitch an epidemiology professor at Harvard University told The Atlantic he predicts anywhere from 40-70% of people globally will be infected with the novel coronavirus within the next year. A copy of the slide is below. (Source: Business Insider)
Those things were created by a tiny group of people. Our country, present and past, has very little historical respect for science. This is why we are the only "educated" country in the world that has any resistance whatsoever to evolution or climate change. Go and look at how many "Americans" actually made discoveries or advancements in the last century. Very few. There are consequences for allowing a populace to be so suspicious of scientific reason.Wow, nice stereotype. I'm happy you have so much faith in our education system that turns out all these young geniuses who are so much more informed than us old fools. I guess our "science education" wasn't good enough to invent cool stuff like transistors and CAT scans and MRIs, etc.
OK guys, keep in mind that hospitals prepare for worst-case scenarios. My friend, who is a big Trump supporter sent me this. It gives me no pleasure in posting this. Not sure why he didn't include the slides. Am trying to get them from him.
Leaked Document for U.S. Hospitals Reveals They're Preparing for Millions of Coronavirus-Related Hospitalizations:
Hospitals are bracing for millions of Americans to be hospitalized as part of the novel coronavirus outbreak. The American Hospital Association, which represents thousands of hospitals and health systems, hosted a webinar in February with its member hospitals and health systems. Business Insider obtained a copy of the slides presented.
As part of the presentation to hospitals, Dr. James Lawler, a professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Center gave his "best guess" estimates of how much the virus might spread in the U.S. That included 4.8 million hospitalizations associated with the novel coronavirus, 96 million cases overall in the U.S., and 480,000 deaths. Overall, the slide points out that hospitals should prepare for an impact to the system that's 10 times a severe flu season. The slide does not give a particular time frame.
The American Hospital Association said the webinar reflects the views of the experts who spoke on it, not its own. Lawler isn't alone in anticipating widespread infections. Marc Lipsitch an epidemiology professor at Harvard University told The Atlantic he predicts anywhere from 40-70% of people globally will be infected with the novel coronavirus within the next year. A copy of the slide is below. (Source: Business Insider)
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best. I have no problem with this, then again I'm an old blue hair who will probably die from this anyway. Winking
Separate quarantine facilities? How exactly do you quarantine over 100 million people?This is good...hopefully they are starting to prepare separate quarantine facilities and can work with the national guard in providing supportive care. I know Georgia already has a separate facility. We can cut the death rate quite dramatically if people can get the respiratory help they need. Also, we need a big jump in antibiotic production. Lincoln is pre-screening anyone who shows up to the hospital...and there are alternative sites to get tested away from the hospital. This is going to be a battle between people allowed the system to unite to face this challenge and people being afraid to lose profits...
As someone who has spent many hours in epidemiology and virology classes, I can tell you that the hand sanitizer routine is pretty hit and miss. You might get lucky and hit the bug at the right time in the right place. There are so many "breaks" that HAVE to happen in sterile technique that take place when using hand sanitizer whether it is in airport security or the local restaurant. Can you sanitize your shoe laces, belt, shoes, wallet, whatever thing you take through security? Not really. How many hands go in to the bin of ice at your local pub as they get you a Coke or mixed drink after they've handled the dirty drink glasses at the bar? Do the fast food employees wear masks when they wrap your burger? Face it, if you're out anywhere in public, eventually you're probably going to get exposed.Had this similar discussion yesterday at the dinner table. My brother told me that air is changed out often on a plane. I didn't know that. So read about it. I guess I'll buy the fact that it's changed out AND mixed with cabin air and fresh oxygen. Supposed HEPA filters take care of other things. Lavoratory air is not recirculated!!
It's people in such close proximity that's the problem.
Sanitze your hands AFTER you get through TSA and not before. You'll thank me later
evolution has nothing to do with scientific innovationThose things were created by a tiny group of people. Our country, present and past, has very little historical respect for science. This is why we are the only "educated" country in the world that has any resistance whatsoever to evolution or climate change. Go and look at how many "Americans" actually made discoveries or advancements in the last century. Very few. There are consequences for allowing a populace to be so suspicious of scientific reason.
evolution has nothing to do with scientific innovation
belittling ones who don't share your faith is counterproductive
depends on what one means by "evolution"He's not suggesting that. He is suggesting that the American populous is fairly resistant to the idea that evolution occurs.
depends on what one means by "evolution"
Most people in general don't accept other faiths
I'm sick of hearing about this virus not gone lie.
What you just described is micro evolution and everyone agrees with it. It is not to be confused with faith based Darwinism. Totally different mechanisms. One is observable and the other not.I guess I don't really know what this means. Evolution to me means the process by which organisms genetically adapt to their environment.
Faith to me (at least in the context of this discussion) means belief in a higher power. It doesn't indicate a religion or ideology.
Just got an email from Harvard University that they have cancelled classes for the rest of the year. Have to move my kid home this weekend which means ubers and lots of time in airports and airplanes.Well, I'm not gonna lie. I'm tired of people treating it with the seriousness of the common cold. Those are the people that will take the responsibility of self-quarantine lightly after they catch it, and will kill other people.
Here's something to chew on.. Less than 3 days ago, we had 350 cases in the U.S. We have more than doubled that number, and are now sitting at 729 confirmed cases. You think this thing isn't going to spread like wildfire from here on out? Think again..
What you just described is micro evolution and everyone agrees with it. It is not to be confused with faith based Darwinism. Totally different mechanisms. One is observable and the other not.
Just got an email from Harvard University that they have cancelled classes for the rest of the year. Have to move my kid home this weekend which means ubers and lots of time in airports and airplanes.I'll be shocked if we don't end up with the virus at our house by late next week. They've got midterms this week so the kids are stressed out. MIT had already announced that everything will be online from now on.
Well, I'm not gonna lie. I'm tired of people treating it with the seriousness of the common cold. Those are the people that will take the responsibility of self-quarantine lightly after they catch it, and will kill other people.
Here's something to chew on.. Less than 3 days ago, we had 350 cases in the U.S. We have more than doubled that number, and are now sitting at 729 confirmed cases. You think this thing isn't going to spread like wildfire from here on out? Think again..
microevolution + time =/= macroevolution.Genotype determines phenotype. Always has. Microevolution takes place before macroevolution takes place. And we have a mechanism in both mitosis and meiosis whereby which traits are altered at the micro level, that also ultimately alter the macro level. It's called recombination, or crossing over. DNA strands are altered in every individual cell.
It's the very reason why we have some traits of one parent and some of the other, but we aren't identical to them. I believe it also serves us in evolution. How could it not? When pressure is applied to us by our environment, changes can take place at the micro level for the organism to better adapt to its environment. That will eventually alter the macro level.
microevolution + time =/= macroevolution.
You are free to believe that tho.
Don't see how you can jump the gap between Mendelian genetics and punctuated equilibrium. PE is a theory brought about by necessity, to make up for the lack of physical evidence.I disagree, but that's fine. We see changes in appearance from our parents in one generation. Punctuated Equilibrium also suggests quick changes to phenotype due to environmental pressures.
Don't see how you can jump the gap between Mendelian genetics and punctuated equilibrium. PE is a theory brought about by necessity, to make up for the lack of physical evidence.
do we increase in genetic information every generation? Quite the opposite.We see physical evidence of our ability to change with every generation. That is physical evidence. Why would you think that wouldn't also apply to our ability to survive harsher climates?
do we increase in genetic information every generation? Quite the opposite.
We have genetics and epigenetics that help with adaptation. Survival traits are built into living things but limited.
Bacterial resistance happens due to a loss of information or the already resistant bacteria is made the majority due to overuse of antibiotics. They have found ancient bacteria that are resistant to penicillin, even tho they never came into contact with it.I would actually think that with every generation, we are increasing variations in gene sequence. We know that viruses and bacteria's DNA are being altered to stay alive, which is creating new viruses and new antibiotic-resistant super bugs, so I would think that would mean that new sequences of DNA are being created.
It's been a long while since I studied this stuff, but I would think that human DNA has become more diverse with every new generation. And how many different strains are there being added to the flu shot every year? New viruses and bacteria mean new genetic material to be sequenced to fight these bugs.
Edit - I'm sure a lot has been discovered that I'm not aware of, but try to stay fairly current. I'll have to learn more about epigenetics.
Bacterial resistance happens due to a loss of information or the already resistant bacteria is made the majority due to overuse of antibiotics. They have found ancient bacteria that are resistant to penicillin, even tho they never came into contact with it.
Every generation of humans has 100 times more mutations than the last, increasing genetic entropy and genetic decay. Pairing of DNA during mating doesn't add information, it just creates a new combination of already existing information. As each generation is born, more and more defects surface and thus the genetic pool overall gets smaller.
A popular theory is that mutations + natural selection is the mechanism for gradual evolution. That was a 19th century scientific theory that has since then been under dispute.Not saying you are wrong, and you have clearly given me some food for thought, but I found this info below. It says that Evolution occurs because of a combination of natural selection and new genetic combinations being created during the recombination phase during meiosis.
Anyway, thanks for the info on epigenetics. I will be bringing myself up to speed..
"Natural selection is usually the most powerful mechanism or process causing evolution to occur, however, it only selects among the existing variation already in a population. It does not create new genetic varieties or new combinations of varieties. One of the sources of those new combinations of genes is recombination during meiosis. It is responsible for producing genetic combinations not found in earlier generations."
This sissy attitude is why I didn’t go to Harvard.*Just got an email from Harvard University that they have cancelled classes for the rest of the year. Have to move my kid home this weekend which means ubers and lots of time in airports and airplanes.I'll be shocked if we don't end up with the virus at our house by late next week. They've got midterms this week so the kids are stressed out. MIT had already announced that everything will be online from now on.
A popular theory is that mutations + natural selection is the mechanism for gradual evolution. That was a 19th century scientific theory that has since then been under dispute.
Natural selection doesn't create but rather selects. I don't have faith that mutations can create complex information on the scale needed for life. They scramble information.
The issue isn't the various combinations of genetic information, rather, the creation/origin of information to select from. So far, encoded information has only been identified as the product of a mind.
Some have postulated punctuated equilibrium by way of the hox genes instead of gradualism due to the gulfs that we see in the plant and animal kingdoms.
Many scientists now have rejected both ideas and are searching for a third option.
This sissy attitude is why I didn’t go to Harvard.*
*Grades and money were also factors.
Stephen J Gould was great on the Simpsons.I wasn't suggesting natural selection creates, but instead, eliminates weaker genetic sequences. The part that I was referring to is the creation of new gene sequences during meiosis. It would appear that both play an important role in evolution.
Anyway, it's always been a fascinating topic to me. So...Stephen J. Gould no longer has any street cred with his Punctuated Equilibrium theory? Bumma.. Making mention of that theory is really showing my age, isn't it?![]()
Could this end our sell out streak this fall?
There are 1000s more cases than that. And for some thats all it
Is a cold
So you want people to blow it out of proportion for what purpose.
It was here before the first case was even reported here. Then it became a political tool. Now you are scared.
But if you or anyone you know gets the flu they could die regardless of age,sex or health.
129 dead kids from the flu this year..spare me the outrage.
Amazingly while they don't offer scholarships, they do tailor tuition to a family's ability to pay. First generation immigrants go for free. First generation minority students also may go for free. They had a top ten basketball recruiting class a couple of years ago and my guess is that most of those guys qualify for free school as first generation college students which I believe is legal by NCAA and conference rules as long as they offer that same thing to all low income students. Unfortunately or fortunately I guess we have the means to shell out 70k a year for college and don't qualify for any tuition breaks. More worried right now about getting the kid home safe and healthy. Massachusetts is up to 92 known positives and nearly a thousand investigatory COVID-19 cases.This sissy attitude is why I didn’t go to Harvard.*
*Grades and money were also factors.