Successful season

What would you consider a tolerable end to a disappointing year


  • Total voters
    0

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
Wait, did I read this correctly? Players are supposed to know the fundamentals before they get here but then later you say the coaches are to teach technique. What am I missing?

yea you read that correctly... players should know fundamentals before they get here... coaches should also teach technique they should be working on fine tuning technique... not starting from scratch
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,460
2,000
113
I know you will strongly disagree with my stance on this but here I go anyways... well before I go I’ll start with saying I am historically very indecisive on the whole changes obviously need to be made... I will be the first to admit that I am not pleased with the performance of our defense, but I have also outlined on multiple occasions why I think our D is where it’s at and my bottom line point is I don’t think it’s all on the coaches... as I’ve said before we are talking about and seeing the same issues from the same group of kids that were here before this staff that we have been seeing and talking about since before this staff... the not driving through contact not wrapping up no huddle not playing through the whistles, it’s all been there from these kids for a long time and the staff can’t constantly work on the things these kids should have known before they even got here, since working on those issues takes away from the game planning... but I guess to try and shorten my ramble I’d say don’t be surprised if there are no changes made at all, I know me personally I wouldn’t be upset if I seen change in the staff, but I wouldn’t be surprised or upset to see it stay the same... the common sense aspect says the coaches are teaching the fundamentals when they can, because no one purposely cuts out parts of their job that will be obvious for everyone to see since it will leans to being fired... I trust the staff is doing what they can, but they are also limited with what personnel they can play at this time... only time will tell what we really truly have For players and coaches
Difference of opinion is fine with me, it is a discussion board after all. I'm not someone who likes to pin blame on everything under the sun when things go wrong. The current coaching staff is really the only group of people that can effect any kind of meaningful change. Imo the current coaching staff is fully accountable to the program, and they are fully responsible for the results on the field. I've always held that view whether the results are good or bad.
 

ssmill777

Junior
Nov 10, 2004
6,621
332
0
You actually echo my thoughts. Going to wait and see how this season plays out before thrashing the senior class. As Frost stated, we have too many guys on this team that feel like it's OK to lose. Need to get that culture out.
I'm afraid some coaches are getting used to losing as well. I am on board with Scott for 3-4 more yrs regardless, but am losing hope that he can turn it around. For me, after 2 yrs of lousy defenses, if no changes are made with the defensive staff this off season and Frost doesn't make a huge push to improve the D, I will begin to doubt his competency as a D1 head coach.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
yea you read that correctly... players should know fundamentals before they get here... coaches should also teach technique they should be working on fine tuning technique... not starting from scratch

So if I could paraphrase, what I think you are saying is they come with the basics of throwing, catching, blocking and tackling. Coaches refine those skills by teaching how they want things done?
 

Solana Beach Husker

All-Conference
Aug 7, 2008
14,102
1,245
0
Im sure at the start of the year not one of us could have envisioned Neb staring down another 4-8 season. I said at the beginning of the year if this team got anything under 8 wins we have huge problems. Yet here were are, and my statement holds true, we do have huge problems. However, that statement was based on a schedule I assumed would be much much easier. At the start of the year we had the 88th ranked SOS. Then teams like MN, Indiana, and wisc decided to do much better than most expected. Currently we are sitting at 32nd SOS. Last year we started at 40th and ended up 46th. So we actually played a tougher schedule this year than last.
So my question, all things considered what would you consider a successful season. Maybe successful is the wrong word. What would you consider a tolerable end to the season.
* Poll should be 7-6 not 7-5
#1 Rule: Can't run a poll right, probably shouldn't be criticizing the the husker head coach. And I make a lot of mistakes, which is why I very sparingly criticize greater men than myself.
 

B1G RED RULES

All-Conference
Sep 7, 2013
4,154
1,132
0
oh? Not even the almost 500 total yards of offense against Wisconsin and the number 1 defense in the country? We only lost that game because we couldn’t finish a few drives and a missed FG. If we can go nose to nose with the Badgers, we most definitely can do it with Iowa. No doubt in my mind. If you don’t see or doubt, that’s on you my man. But if we play Iowa like we did Wisconsin and manage to finish the drives...we can pull this game off.
Ifs and buts. Sorry, not into moral victories.
 

WTFMatt

Senior
Feb 14, 2010
914
747
93
I'm not going to get hung up on defining what would be tolerable. That ship sailed about two months ago. At this point I hope something positive happens otherwise it's going to be a long winter. If we win Saturday it sets up a fun Friday against Iowa, and I'd like to think the team would show more of a pulse than we've seen all year. That's what I'll be watching for.

This is what I am looking for as well. What happens with this team when something salvageable is on the line? Beat Maryland, pull out an upset against Iowa, and the outlook on next year changes dramatically.
 

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
So if I could paraphrase, what I think you are saying is they come with the basics of throwing, catching, blocking and tackling. Coaches refine those skills by teaching how they want things done?
I’d guess you could paraphrase however you want... you could always go back re read what I’m saying and oh I don’t know stop trying to be a smart *** about it... the bottom line is the kids that come here or any college showed that they had the skill set to play at the “next level” meaning they had the skill and potential to play at the collegiate level... meaning that they should know to wrap up on tackles, play through the whistle, hustle, drive through contact... it would then be the college coaches job to “refine” each kids form... from the basics of I was bigger, faster, stronger then most I played with to, now I must use proper technique to break past a block, to play transition from back peddle to sticking to the guys hip, turning to find the ball... sooo if we can be done with the stupid antics that’d be great... I have no tolerance for someone trying to be a smart ***
 

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
Ifs and buts. Sorry, not into moral victories.

Well good deal because we weren’t talking about moral victories. Just to touch on this point, you say moral victories and I say it’s giving credit where it’s Credit is due. Our offense was able to go up and down the field on Wisconsin, we just couldn’t put it in the end zone . Wisconsin has an elite defense and one of the best defenses we faced all season. And if we can hang 500 total yards of offense on Wisconsin’s defense, we can definitely do it to Iowa’s defense, their defense isn’t as good as Wisconsin’s defense is.

Iowa is far from unbeatable. They are not OSU, Wisconsin, Michigan or even PSU. Again, if we can hang almost 500 total yards against the Badgers, we can definitely do against Iowa. Just hopefully we get that Redzone issues fixed...GBR
 
Last edited:

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
Total defense - Wisconsin is #4 giving up 257 yards per game.

Nebraska is #82 giving up 413 yards per game

Is there another stat that makes them #1?

edit: I looked up Red Zone offense - Georgia is #1 at .976, Nebraska is #122 at .700. We haven’t shown the ability to finish drives all year and on the other hand, stop others, not a great combination.

lmfao, ok...after we hung almost 500 on them they are what, number 4 in the nation now. When we played them they where ranked number 1. Stop being a douche bag bro. Ranked 1st or ranked 4th...not much difference. That’s still a beast defense.

Two, where on the world was I taking about the Huskers defense? Please quote me my man?!?! I’ll wait for it....then again, you won’t be able to because I didn’t say a dam word about our defense and how we played. I was making a point on how good the Badgers defense was. And like i said, before we hung dam near 500 on them, they where ranked number 1 in the country in overall yards allowed per game when we played them.

note, I kept saying over and over and over again our biggest issue is finishing drives. Hell we’d won the Badgers game had we finished our drives. Our offense absolutely lite up that Badger defense. We just could not stuff into the end zone.
 
Last edited:

SkerInCo

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2004
5,270
1,285
0
Colorado was the biggest disappointment for me. It was the first sign that things hadn’t changed much since last year.
I'm with you. The CU loss was the angriest I've been in a while. The others were just the usual disappointment and eventual apathy.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
I’d guess you could paraphrase however you want... you could always go back re read what I’m saying and oh I don’t know stop trying to be a smart *** about it... the bottom line is the kids that come here or any college showed that they had the skill set to play at the “next level” meaning they had the skill and potential to play at the collegiate level... meaning that they should know to wrap up on tackles, play through the whistle, hustle, drive through contact... it would then be the college coaches job to “refine” each kids form... from the basics of I was bigger, faster, stronger then most I played with to, now I must use proper technique to break past a block, to play transition from back peddle to sticking to the guys hip, turning to find the ball... sooo if we can be done with the stupid antics that’d be great... I have no tolerance for someone trying to be a smart ***

I actually agree with your general assessment of the process. So my next question has to naturally follow - why haven't our players improved in many areas?
 

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
I actually agree with your general assessment of the process. So my next question has to naturally follow - why haven't our players improved in many areas?
and that’s a very valid question, and it’s a question I find myself trying to answer a lot on this board... the reality is I don’t have the answer to that, but my theory, which I know people won’t agree with, is it does ultimately begin with the previous staff, with the Precedents they set, the not working out, the effort put forth in practice, and the change over and lack of consistency with position coaches... correct me for my ignorance here as I haven’t really dug through the roster but some of these kids have been here through even Bo’s final year, they have seen a TON of turnover and frankly their time and UNL has been full of losses and change and has most likely been down right miserable, in essence they lost all their F••ks to give, and it shows... there are certain things I can preach all day to anyone that works for me, I can preach effort, I can preach consistency, but I can’t teach it, and when employees (players) know that there are no their options and they won’t get fired (benched) then they have no motivation to give it their all... it is up to the player to have that integrity to do the right thing, to drive through the ball, to hustle, to play from whistle to whistle, it’s in the coaches to provide the motivation to make the players want to do that... now it is difficult for the coaches to provide the motivation if you have no one that is physically ready to play behind them... and they can’t really go back and dive too much into during the season, due to having to game plan, and I think it was @oldjar07 that said it and he is correct to an extent, if you don’t continue to work on basics then you can game plan all you want it won’t get you any where, but the reverse is true too, you can work on fundamentals all you want but without game planning you’ll be lost and won’t get any where, you have to find a balance between the two without having to constantly go back to square one with the basics that they should already know... if we can’t get past the basics, how can we develop you and fine tune into something better?
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
#1 Rule: Can't run a poll right, probably shouldn't be criticizing the the husker head coach. And I make a lot of mistakes, which is why I very sparingly criticize greater men than myself.
Good rule of thumb, when someone comments and they have almost 6 times the amount of post vs likes I don't take their opinions too seriously. It means one blows lots of hot air with little substance.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,801
78
Good rule of thumb, when someone comments and they have almost 6 times the amount of post vs likes I don't take their opinions too seriously. It means one blows lots of hot air with little substance.
Some posters Winking had thousands of posts before the "like" button was added.
 

daddy mack

Senior
Jan 19, 2002
1,924
506
0
Im sure at the start of the year not one of us could have envisioned Neb staring down another 4-8 season. I said at the beginning of the year if this team got anything under 8 wins we have huge problems. Yet here were are, and my statement holds true, we do have huge problems. However, that statement was based on a schedule I assumed would be much much easier. At the start of the year we had the 88th ranked SOS. Then teams like MN, Indiana, and wisc decided to do much better than most expected. Currently we are sitting at 32nd SOS. Last year we started at 40th and ended up 46th. So we actually played a tougher schedule this year than last.
So my question, all things considered what would you consider a successful season. Maybe successful is the wrong word. What would you consider a tolerable end to the season.
* Poll should be 7-6 not 7-5
I like the 7-5 one it dose sound better then 7-6. Dose that get us in the Blue Bonnet Bowl against Iowa in a rematch?
 

HuskredO1

Redshirt
Nov 20, 2019
58
0
0
So last year I picked us to win 6 pre-season and thought I was being overly cautious considering where everyone else was at. This year pre-season, I had us with 6 again and a bowl game and thought I was being overly cautious again :p

I am still holding out hope to be right once.
Unfortunately, I had us winning 4 in Riley’s last year. I had us winning 4 in Frost’s first year. I had us winning 5 this year. And I have us winning 5 next year. I hope I’m wrong but it looks like I’m probably not going to be.
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
I like the 7-5 one it dose sound better then 7-6. Dose that get us in the Blue Bonnet Bowl against Iowa in a rematch?
It does look and sound better, yes. Not correct, thats why it was corrected yesterday, seconds after it was posted.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
Good rule of thumb, when someone comments and they have almost 6 times the amount of post vs likes I don't take their opinions too seriously. It means one blows lots of hot air with little substance.

some post suggestions/themes for those with poor "post to like" ratios

-- suggest random walkon player might be the next Grant Wistrom
-- demand that local Nebraska kid get a scholarship offer despite no other power 5 offers
-- liberal use of diamond in the rough, or under the radar verbiage
-- "stars don't matter"
-- Iowa sucks
-- pipeline and/or Milt
-- Blackshirt/McBride
-- run the ball
-- national titles, blue blood, emphasis on how good we used to be
-- patience
-- fullback

-- and if the "likes" still aren't flowing the standard default is yoga pants pics
 
Jun 16, 2004
3,113
824
113
I said before the season that getting to a bowl game was my ultimate hope for this season. I was hoping I was being pessimistic but a lot of the issues I worried about came to fruition.

That being said, I voted for 7-5 simply for the morale boost to a lot of the fans who bought into the kool-aid before the season. I feel like people didn't fully grasp the level of a rebuild this program needs especially with several established coaches in both divisions. It's going to take some time. The undeserved media hype to start the season made things even worse.

Regardless of wins, I'm hoping we continue to see the offensive line progress as they have the last couple weeks. I'm hoping we can continue to see Dedrick Mills put up good rushing totals. I'm also hoping that Adrian can get his confidence level up to end the season and start the offseason on a positive note.

Defensively, I want as many young guys to play as possible just to get their feet wet heading into the offseason. I loved seeing Nelson and Robinson play and hope we can see a few other young guys get some snaps and valuable experience. Anyone that plays hard should be in there regardless of seniority.

While this season's ultimate goals are lost, there are still opportunities to take advantage of and I just hope the coaching staff and team is able to do so.
 

Skerz81

Redshirt
Jul 29, 2018
177
21
0
I know you will strongly disagree with my stance on this but here I go anyways... well before I go I’ll start with saying I am historically very indecisive on the whole changes obviously need to be made... I will be the first to admit that I am not pleased with the performance of our defense, but I have also outlined on multiple occasions why I think our D is where it’s at and my bottom line point is I don’t think it’s all on the coaches... as I’ve said before we are talking about and seeing the same issues from the same group of kids that were here before this staff that we have been seeing and talking about since before this staff... the not driving through contact not wrapping up no hustle not playing through the whistles, it’s all been there from these kids for a long time and the staff can’t constantly work on the things these kids should have known before they even got here, since working on those issues takes away from the game planning... but I guess to try and shorten my ramble I’d say don’t be surprised if there are no changes made at all, I know me personally I wouldn’t be upset if I seen change in the staff, but I wouldn’t be surprised or upset to see it stay the same... the common sense aspect says the coaches are teaching the fundamentals when they can, because no one purposely cuts out parts of their job that will be obvious for everyone to see since it will leans to being fired... I trust the staff is doing what they can, but they are also limited with what personnel they can play at this time... only time will tell what we really truly have For players and coaches
Chins isn’t going anywhere. Although I think he’s partially to blame, I see more of the problems being in 1) lack of athletes, 2) poor attitude and mental toughness and 3) poor player leadership.
 

CatColumbia

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2014
5,934
3,139
0
I'm afraid some coaches are getting used to losing as well. I am on board with Scott for 3-4 more yrs regardless, but am losing hope that he can turn it around. For me, after 2 yrs of lousy defenses, if no changes are made with the defensive staff this off season and Frost doesn't make a huge push to improve the D, I will begin to doubt his competency as a D1 head coach.

So we have 2 things against us, first is we’re not very talented or deep. Second, our dc is pretty green. He’s only been a defensive coach for 6 years. You mesh those two things together and you get exactly what we’re seeing. I think we should give Chins at least through next year to see any improvement. I would also like to see him be a better recruiter but kinda like the chicken and the egg, can’t get the top recruits if we’re playing uninspiring football.
 
Sep 7, 2018
1,079
346
83
So we have 2 things against us, first is we’re not very talented or deep. Second, our dc is pretty green. He’s only been a defensive coach for 6 years. You mesh those two things together and you get exactly what we’re seeing. I think we should give Chins at least through next year to see any improvement. I would also like to see him be a better recruiter but kinda like the chicken and the egg, can’t get the top recruits if we’re playing uninspiring football.

Over the past 25 years we've seen stretches where coaching stability was perceived as a key to our success (TO), stretches where coaching stability or unwillingness to make changes was perceived as part of our problem (later part of Solich era and Callahan tenure), and stretches where lack of coaching stability was perceived as part of our problem (End of Pelini-Riley-beginning of Frost eras). Its been awhile since we blamed stability for our issues problem - so maybe we should try that for awhile.

That and getting better talent as already stated.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,460
2,000
113
Over the past 25 years we've seen stretches where coaching stability was perceived as a key to our success (TO), stretches where coaching stability or unwillingness to make changes was perceived as part of our problem (later part of Solich era and Callahan tenure), and stretches where lack of coaching stability was perceived as part of our problem (End of Pelini-Riley-beginning of Frost eras). Its been awhile since we blamed stability for our issues problem - so maybe we should try that for awhile.

That and getting better talent as already stated.
Stability is good when you have good coaches. When you have several coaches that have been performing below par, stability doesn't help a damn thing.
 
Sep 7, 2018
1,079
346
83
Stability is good when you have good coaches. When you have several coaches that have been performing below par, stability doesn't help a damn thing.

Agreed. At the same time, changing coaching when you don't have much talent doesn't do much either, unless the coaches you are getting rid of are part of the reason you don't have much talent.
 

Loyal Muke

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2019
32
0
0
Well good deal because we weren’t talking about moral victories. Just to touch on this point, you say moral victories and I say it’s giving credit where it’s Credit is due. Our offense was able to go up and down the field on Wisconsin, we just couldn’t put it in the end zone . Wisconsin has an elite defense and one of the best defenses we faced all season. And if we can hang 500 total yards of offense on Wisconsin’s defense, we can definitely do it to Iowa’s defense, their defense isn’t as good as Wisconsin’s defense is.

Iowa is far from unbeatable. They are not OSU, Wisconsin, Michigan or even PSU. Again, if we can hang almost 500 total yards against the Badgers, we can definitely do against Iowa. Just hopefully we get that Redzone issues fixed...GBR

You won’t get 500 yds against Iowa, in all probability Martinez will get sacked so many times he can’t finish the game. Frost needs to fix the deer in the headlights look he gets on his face when the opposing teams onslaught begins.
 

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
You won’t get 500 yds against Iowa, in all probability Martinez will get sacked so many times he can’t finish the game. Frost needs to fix the deer in the headlights look he gets on his face when the opposing teams onslaught begins.
Right, we only put up 400 yards last year at your place where you won on a last second FG from 40+ out against a team that ended 4-8. Real shutdown D.
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
Difference of opinion is fine with me, it is a discussion board after all. I'm not someone who likes to pin blame on everything under the sun when things go wrong. The current coaching staff is really the only group of people that can effect any kind of meaningful change. Imo the current coaching staff is fully accountable to the program, and they are fully responsible for the results on the field. I've always held that view whether the results are good or bad.
I lean towards agreeing with this. However playing devils advocate. Going into the year most had high hopes for the D, why? Because they had the most experience and most upper class men. In most situations that is a good thing. However, all upper class men are MR recruits. As we have heard MR didn't exactly run a tight ship. If these guys, who were in a system where they could pretty well half *** it for 3 years. Suddenly get thrown into a program where I assume you are expected to work your *** off. I don't see that being an easy transition for them. I could see where some are just saying screw it, lets do bare min, until I graduate. Most of MR recruits aren't going pro and they know it.
Now lets say as a coach you know these guys aren't giving it 100%. Yes, the are doing what is asked, yes they know the plays, but they just aren't giving that extra effort that is needed. What are your options? You can get on them over and over and over in an attempt to get them to try harder. In the end it has to come down to them wanting to, if they don't want to nothing with change that. Or you could bench them. In theory that is great, but who replaces them? Younger guys who probably aren't ready mentally or physically. If you throw the young guys in to soon you risk injury and messing up their confidence. Plus you burn potential red shirts.
Hopefully in the future this will never be a big issue. We should have the depth and whole team of guys who are busting their asses. If there is a guy who isn't, you bench him and have the luxury of having 2 or 3 deep to replace him. I just don't think Frost as the option to do that yet.
 

Sporty

Senior
Jul 4, 2007
2,622
638
113
There are only 4 RS Seniors in the three deep.. Davis, Davis, Davis and Barry. Barry was arguably the best defender on the team a year ago. There is depth at DT.. So not sure that one can really make the argument that Riley guys are the problem on the defense. The rest of the guys have now had Frost and company for as long as they had Riley. As I have said for months now , this is an excuse that really does not hold water! I do have to question continuing to send Alex Davis out there when his numbers are so poor! However since I have been told it is not coaching on the D side of the ball what do I know!
 

TheBeav815

All-American
Feb 19, 2007
18,955
5,101
0
Tall task to beat Iowa but if they come out and show they can run effectively again against Maryland, they have a shot. Ending up 5-7 will make that Purdue pants pissing even more infuriating in hindsight. Just call some boring run plays with your big back inside the 3 yard line and you win that game going away. I hope Scott lets that lesson burn in his brain for a long time.

With how young, thin, and mentally weak this team is in combination with inexperience and foolish stubbornness of the staff at times, Moos ends up looking like a prophet. Getting to a bowl game is a step forward.

Then they need to go out and sign another big, talented class.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
Agreed. At the same time, changing coaching when you don't have much talent doesn't do much either, unless the coaches you are getting rid of are part of the reason you don't have much talent.

Here is where I struggle with all of this. How do you know you don't have the talent if the coaching is not there? It is easy to say, we just need better players but then, some coaches can make players better.

Personally, I can't say with confidence that what I am seeing on the field, execution and state wise reflects completely the ability of the athletes. If it does, then we have nearly an entire team that was not evaluated well.
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
There are only 4 RS Seniors in the three deep.. Davis, Davis, Davis and Barry. Barry was arguably the best defender on the team a year ago. There is depth at DT.. So not sure that one can really make the argument that Riley guys are the problem on the defense. The rest of the guys have now had Frost and company for as long as they had Riley. As I have said for months now , this is an excuse that really does not hold water! I do have to question continuing to send Alex Davis out there when his numbers are so poor! However since I have been told it is not coaching on the D side of the ball what do I know!
Again, I think Chin probably needs to go sooner than later. When looking at the starter only 2 are Frost guys. Looking at the 2 deep Almost all are RS fresh or Fresh or soph. Frost guys are there beating out MR guys for the two deep, I just don't think they are ready to take on bigger roles.
I know you said many of MR recruits had as much time with Frost as they did with Riley. I get that side of it as well. Each coach or coaches has a certain type of player they are going after. MR and staff seemed to care more about the ranking and stars vs what Frost finds important, the character, heart, and passion. I think that is why we saw so many of MR top recruits take off. They cared more about themselves and didn't want to earn or work for anything. Now Im not saying all of MR or Frost guys fit "their type of player" in general. The different personalities of MR players vs Frost players could be some of the issues as to why they just aren't buying into Frosts mentality.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
I lean towards agreeing with this. However playing devils advocate. Going into the year most had high hopes for the D, why? Because they had the most experience and most upper class men. In most situations that is a good thing. However, all upper class men are MR recruits. As we have heard MR didn't exactly run a tight ship. If these guys, who were in a system where they could pretty well half *** it for 3 years. Suddenly get thrown into a program where I assume you are expected to work your *** off. I don't see that being an easy transition for them. I could see where some are just saying screw it, lets do bare min, until I graduate. Most of MR recruits aren't going pro and they know it.
Now lets say as a coach you know these guys aren't giving it 100%. Yes, the are doing what is asked, yes they know the plays, but they just aren't giving that extra effort that is needed. What are your options? You can get on them over and over and over in an attempt to get them to try harder. In the end it has to come down to them wanting to, if they don't want to nothing with change that. Or you could bench them. In theory that is great, but who replaces them? Younger guys who probably aren't ready mentally or physically. If you throw the young guys in to soon you risk injury and messing up their confidence. Plus you burn potential red shirts.
Hopefully in the future this will never be a big issue. We should have the depth and whole team of guys who are busting their asses. If there is a guy who isn't, you bench him and have the luxury of having 2 or 3 deep to replace him. I just don't think Frost as the option to do that yet.

all of this is possible but not likely. First, I have heard players say the "lack of work" theory under Riley was highly exaggerated. I have no way of knowing. Let's say it was for a minute - then one has to assume it is wide spread which I do not think is the case. Athletes in general have a desire to succeed. They are not strangers to hard work as this has been their passion for many years. I think it is too easy to just make blanket statements as to the competitiveness and "want to" of a group of players.

I do think, this group of coaches would bench a kid if they truly thought they were just going through the motions and not giving great effort. It is out there on film for everyone to see. So a motivated kid with less talent and experience can probably do as much as a more talented one with less drive. Again, the fall back is we have less talented kids behind the more talented but less motivated - is that REALLY true? If coaches don't make that call, then it is all on them. Ultimately, it is anyway. Their jobs are on the line with all of this, like it or not.
 

Ewooc

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2010
6,114
3,053
0
I do think, this group of coaches would bench a kid if they truly thought they were just going through the motions and not giving great effort. It is out there on film for everyone to see. So a motivated kid with less talent and experience can probably do as much as a more talented one with less drive. Again, the fall back is we have less talented kids behind the more talented but less motivated - is that REALLY true? If coaches don't make that call, then it is all on them. Ultimately, it is anyway. Their jobs are on the line with all of this, like it or not.

They will all be millionaires either way. Not to go off on a side tangent but what motivation is there for coaches now days to succeed? They are competitive, yeah ok that is some of it. With these massive pay days and get paid no matter what good or bad. What motivates them to do good or make changes or whatever? They know if things don't work out they get paid. I am in no way saying Frost isn't motivated to succeed. I know he wants to turn this around 1st and money is 2nd. I am just saying in general for all coaches. There really needs to be a structure in place to motivate. Similar to us working a job. If you knew when you started a job that they had to pay you $80,000 per year for 7 years no matter what, even if you get fired. How much motivation do you have to go above and beyond?
 

Loyal Muke

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2019
32
0
0
Right, we only put up 400 yards last year at your place where you won on a last second FG from 40+ out against a team that ended 4-8. Real shutdown D.

This isn’t 2018 and Nebraska is not nearly as good a team Nov 2019 as they were in Nov 2018. You know down deep what’s gonna happen on the 29th. You won’t get 500 yds against the Bullies of The B1G.
 

John_J_Rambo

Senior
Feb 22, 2019
2,015
906
13
This isn’t 2018 and Nebraska is not nearly as good a team Nov 2019 as they were in Nov 2018. You know down deep what’s gonna happen on the 29th. You won’t get 500 yds against the Bullies of The B1G.
i thought we just put up 500 yds against wisconsin? am I missing something?
 

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
This isn’t 2018 and Nebraska is not nearly as good a team Nov 2019 as they were in Nov 2018. You know down deep what’s gonna happen on the 29th. You won’t get 500 yds against the Bullies of The B1G.
Funny, a bunch of you spouted the same song and dance last year. Nothing but talk all year long and then dropped an egg on game day. You were neither scary nor particularly impressive. What's changed in a year? You look exactly the same. You were 7-4 this time last year and 7-3 this year. I expect pretty much the same from both teams.
 

B1G RED RULES

All-Conference
Sep 7, 2013
4,154
1,132
0
Here is where I struggle with all of this. How do you know you don't have the talent if the coaching is not there? It is easy to say, we just need better players but then, some coaches can make players better.

Personally, I can't say with confidence that what I am seeing on the field, execution and state wise reflects completely the ability of the athletes. If it does, then we have nearly an entire team that was not evaluated well.
The talent excuse has been exposed several times. We have a team full of solid 3 star players with a few 4 stars mixed in. None of the “we need talent” people can dispute this. Yet nearly every other program that has the same roster beats Nebraska head to head. Conclusion - we need a roster of 4 star talent to compete with Iowa, Minnesota and Purdue in our conference and powerhouses like Colorado outside the conference.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,460
2,000
113
I lean towards agreeing with this. However playing devils advocate. Going into the year most had high hopes for the D, why? Because they had the most experience and most upper class men. In most situations that is a good thing. However, all upper class men are MR recruits. As we have heard MR didn't exactly run a tight ship. If these guys, who were in a system where they could pretty well half *** it for 3 years. Suddenly get thrown into a program where I assume you are expected to work your *** off. I don't see that being an easy transition for them. I could see where some are just saying screw it, lets do bare min, until I graduate. Most of MR recruits aren't going pro and they know it.
Now lets say as a coach you know these guys aren't giving it 100%. Yes, the are doing what is asked, yes they know the plays, but they just aren't giving that extra effort that is needed. What are your options? You can get on them over and over and over in an attempt to get them to try harder. In the end it has to come down to them wanting to, if they don't want to nothing with change that. Or you could bench them. In theory that is great, but who replaces them? Younger guys who probably aren't ready mentally or physically. If you throw the young guys in to soon you risk injury and messing up their confidence. Plus you burn potential red shirts.
Hopefully in the future this will never be a big issue. We should have the depth and whole team of guys who are busting their asses. If there is a guy who isn't, you bench him and have the luxury of having 2 or 3 deep to replace him. I just don't think Frost as the option to do that yet.
As a coach within reason you do whatever you have to to get your players to play the way you expect them to play. That's the job description of what a coach is. So if you have to get on them over and over to learn the fundamentals, to know the playbook, and to play with the right effort level, that's exactly what should be done.