The NCAA committee should have went back to their early 2000s-like agenda and produced a regional like this...
1- Tennessee
2- Creighton (host)
3- Nebraska
4- Omaha
The committee has awarded a 2 seed a host site in some years so why not do it this year? Can you image the crowds that would come out to these games? It would be better than a possible UCLA- Oregon State, Ok State- Tex Tech, Arkansas- Miss State super regional matchups.
The committee has done better. Not complaining about Nebraska's manageable pairing. I think we got a better draw than Creighton and Omaha but at some point I think the committee needs to spread some of the host sites around when you have good seasons by teams that are not normally in the host discussion.
1- Tennessee
2- Creighton (host)
3- Nebraska
4- Omaha
The committee has awarded a 2 seed a host site in some years so why not do it this year? Can you image the crowds that would come out to these games? It would be better than a possible UCLA- Oregon State, Ok State- Tex Tech, Arkansas- Miss State super regional matchups.
The committee has done better. Not complaining about Nebraska's manageable pairing. I think we got a better draw than Creighton and Omaha but at some point I think the committee needs to spread some of the host sites around when you have good seasons by teams that are not normally in the host discussion.