CORRECT
OK Im a receiver on a team that has NO DEPTH at Receiver
My team won 4 games and didnt score many points
The NEW guys offense leads the nation in scoring, they went 12-0 and the scheme creates lots of seperation that receivers DIDNT see at NU
But Im upset because I like the old stuff better than the new stuff?
Im thinking I should go to another team? Really?
Cant imagine a team with less WR depth than NU
Sit out a year away from my friends and play scout team- that's always fun
Take my chances that I can break into the starting lineup the following year
On a team NOT coached by someone that has consistently put up video game numbers on offense
Yep that sounds like a great plan- let me punch that ticket right away
BTW- we saw Tanner Lee throw into some pretty tight windows in 2017, When I watch football on Saturdays, I see the better teams receivers catching balls with good seperation- seperation I saw VERY LITTLE of with the 2017 NU offense.
If any of our receivers aren't smart enough to see that the new team will be MUCH better for their selfish self interests than the old team- not sure they are smart enough to play the game- let alone be able to find their way to the stadium or cafeteria without getting lost or running out in front of a bus- here at NU.
At the end of the day:
A post route is a post route
An arrow route is an arrow route
A choice route is a choice route
Ball get offs are ball get offs
Blocking is blocking
Frost has man and zone beaters, pre and post snap reads- just like the WCO guys. He has components of that offense in his passing game where it makes sense thanks to Walsh and his NFL days.
AND - they get more yards, score more touchdowns, play WAY MORE SNAPS and as an added BONUS- get to play on a team that will actually compete and win. Not sure how that isnt a BIGGER BETTER DEAL.
There isn't a bigger misconception about the Huskers in 2017 than the "separation" of the receiving corp. The team nearly had two 1,000 yard receivers, a 3rd option who had over 40 catches and 600+ yards. Hell they had a 2 tight ends whom combined for 40+ catches and 5 TDs.
The biggest issue was pressure and Nebraska's inability to recognize pressure, consistently block pressure, and how it often knocked the passing game off schedule. In reality, there were plenty of yards, points, and completions left off the field simply because the offensive line was often completely innept. Secondly, the absolute dumpster fire of a running game meant opponents had no reason to remain gap sound or play conservatively with extra bodies in the defensive backfield.
In reality, some times guys do get covered. Sometimes defenses recognize where they need to focus personnel. As a DC you hope you can force the QB into throwing that direction. It happened a lot more than necessary. Lastly, I can promise there were roughly 5 to 7 offensive plays per game where Nebraska had WIDE open receivers streaking behind the defense, but Tanner was either running for his life or already on his back.
Hell, Tyjion Lindsey could've had 6 or 7 TD's this season had a throw even been tossed his direction.... And knowing how predictable Langsdorf was to Opponents, I bet they often knew exactly when Nebraska was looking vertical strictly based on Tyjion's formation.
However, FWIW, you would have to be functionally slow to decline playing in Scott Frost's offense if you're a College football skill player. At UCF in 2017, they had 9 offensive players carry the football 20 or more times, and only 4 of them were running backs. They had 10 players with at least double digit catches. They constantly flex players in and out of the backfield with motion and will run or throw on any down and distance. You would be nuts to pass up that chance.