This is a graphic that you don't want to be low on... It looks like Texas is sucking hind tit. I know of a dozen people in my town that are symptomatic and still can't get tested. Mississippi is slightly over 100 tests per 100,0000 residents. Iowa is at 125 for glfr. I linked the spreadsheet where you can run your state's numbers. Just divide total tests by population and multiply that number by 100k.
My county is really dropping the ball. A little over a million residents. 88 positive tests. 355 negative. So we have a 20% positive rate which is pretty high... Yet we have only test 42 people per 100,000... Election time will be a reckoning for some local politicians.
National average is 191/100k and 15% positive test rate.
View attachment 15683
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/2/d/e/2PACX-1vRwAqp96T9sYYq2-i7Tj0pvTf6XVHjDSMIKBdZHXiCGGdNC0ypEU9NbngS8mxea55JuCFuua1MUeOj5/pubhtml#
My county is really dropping the ball. A little over a million residents. 88 positive tests. 355 negative. So we have a 20% positive rate which is pretty high... Yet we have only test 42 people per 100,000... Election time will be a reckoning for some local politicians.
National average is 191/100k and 15% positive test rate.
View attachment 15683
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/2/d/e/2PACX-1vRwAqp96T9sYYq2-i7Tj0pvTf6XVHjDSMIKBdZHXiCGGdNC0ypEU9NbngS8mxea55JuCFuua1MUeOj5/pubhtml#
Last edited: