Aside from the Tunsil draft night revelations, what did you expect to be in the NOA that wasn't?
There's no sign of burner phones in there.
One of the prospects who received benefits might be Bo Scarborough, or it might not.
What else?
For me, it's not a particular accusation missing, but an expected self-imposed penalty: vacated wins. They have to know the NCAA is going to require them to surrender the games played in by the 2010 ACT prospects, just like they did ULL. The "we checked with the ACT folks" excuse won't cut it.
Having skimmed through the allegations and response, I also have to ask how Harris still has a job. He should've made an easy sacrificial lamb.
There's no sign of burner phones in there.
One of the prospects who received benefits might be Bo Scarborough, or it might not.
What else?
For me, it's not a particular accusation missing, but an expected self-imposed penalty: vacated wins. They have to know the NCAA is going to require them to surrender the games played in by the 2010 ACT prospects, just like they did ULL. The "we checked with the ACT folks" excuse won't cut it.
Having skimmed through the allegations and response, I also have to ask how Harris still has a job. He should've made an easy sacrificial lamb.