lol, well, you would have just been laughed out of the courtroom and lost your case when it was brought up that the hazing incident occured during the cheer camp hosted by UCA in TN that was not a UK sponsored event. Also, the hazing involved reciting a lewd cheer from the 1970's individually. It was alleged they had to remove an article of clothing if they messed up, that has been denied and even UK admitted they could not corroborate that claim. How would they be endangered by that? Choke on their tongue perhaps? Or maybe a sprain from excessive jazz hands? [laughing]
The coaches can't allow or stop private citizens from bringing their boats and alcohol on a public lake. I'm sure many boats on the lake that weekend had booz, UK isn't responsible for them either. It's a public lake. If the coaches were openly allowing it, why were the players having to hide it in Gatorade bottles and water bottled and have to sneak it in?
Your linked case involves a fraternity forcing a student of non-drinking age to consume alcohol, then him falling down a flight of stairs with no one seeking medical attention for over 24 hours. They observed him excessively vomiting, twitching around on the floor and clutching his abdomen. They proceeded to punch him in the abdomen and carried him around the house while filming it on Snapchat. He was also on drugs as well. In this instance the fraternity was also on probation for previous incidents related to alcohol violations. Before medical assistance was called, the frat brothers made attempts to clean the victim up and the crime scene, as was recorded on cameras.
You seem to have left this part out, so here are the outcomes from this case, and you will notice the school was never held liable. Instead, the courts found the fraternity brothers who actually broke the rules responsible.
The Piazza case resulted in one of the largest hazing prosecutions in US history.[4] On May 5, 2017, following a grand jury investigation, eighteen members of the fraternity were charged in connection with Piazza's death: eight were charged with involuntary manslaughter and the rest with other offenses, including hazing.
Also, The Indiana Supreme Court held that a local university could not be held responsible for the injuries sustained by a pledge because the university was merely the landlord of the fraternity property. The university gave up control of the property in favor of the fraternity and the university’s responsibilities did not include oversight of the fraternity house. In this case in Indiana, there was no recovery for the injured student.