The NCAA still doesn't get it

CincinnatiWildcat

All-Conference
Feb 8, 2015
1,219
1,970
0
No, YOU don't understand. Why would a company give money to a far less popular/ recognized NCAA player when they could give it/have a PRO endorse them? Minus Zion, no high school/college basketball player has a following like STAR pro players.

Greek Freak > Obi Toppin
Lebron > Imannuel Quickley


Simply being in a big city guarantees nothing if there's no demand for you. Ask the millions of failed actresses/ musicians/ etc who thought they'd instantly make it big traveling to NYC/LA/etc.
The would pay the college kids less money and most likely be local ads
 

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,802
2,871
113
There will definitely be at least one billionaire type who is an alum of a bad basketball school who on ego alone will find a way to fund a good team now. Especially since they can now take credit for it. For example, do Depaul or St. John's have any mega rich alums that love basketball?
 

UKnCincy_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2008
3,504
4,024
0
There will definitely be at least one billionaire type who is an alum of a bad basketball school who on ego alone will find a way to fund a good team now. Especially since they can now take credit for it. For example, do Depaul or St. John's have any mega rich alums that love basketball?

An alum cannot directly provide the money to an athlete so an alum’s personal wealth is irrelevant.

If an alum were to want to help the school By paying athletes, then they would need to own or fully control a business which has sufficient cash flow and margin to enable these types of payments without negatively impacting the performance of the business itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKWildcatT

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,802
2,871
113
An alum cannot directly provide the money to an athlete so an alum’s personal wealth is irrelevant.

If an alum were to want to help the school By paying athletes, then they would need to own or fully control a business which has sufficient cash flow and margin to enable these types of payments without negatively impacting the performance of the business itself.

If they have a ton of money, they probably have a successful business. You can now find a way legally and get credit. It is a lost better return than giving some kid 200k to sign with your program for a year and no one can know publicly.
 

UKnCincy_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2008
3,504
4,024
0
If they have a ton of money, they probably have a successful business. You can now find a way legally and get credit. It is a lost better return than giving some kid 200k to sign with your program for a year and no one can know publicly.

I think most people are greatly overestimating the ease with which a booster could use a business to pay athletes as an inducement.

Let’s use Joe Craft, arguably UK’s largest booster, as an example. He’s personally a billionaire and can donate as much of his personal wealth as he wants to UK.

Professionally, he’s the CEO of Alliance Resources, which is a publicly traded coal company. Coal companies do not sell to consumers and therefore have little use for endorsements at the company level.

If Craft were to direct Alliance to pay UK athletes for endorsements in order to support the program, knowing that it will provide a negative return for Alliance, then Craft is likely to find himself in hot water with shareholders pretty quickly.

And that’ll be the same case for nearly every booster who’s involved with a large company, particularly if there are other partners or shareholders involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKWildcatT

HoldMyBeer

All-Conference
Feb 22, 2017
2,508
3,512
0
When you are in the military do you get private planes for all your travel, all food paid for, top notch training with personal trainers as well as tutors for your schooling. You also decide to do both knowing exactly the deal up front ( unless you are old and got drafted in which case, Thank you) Jalen Green got paid what 500k to play in the G-league next year? I guarantee you Kentucky will be spending more money that that overall when it comes to Terrance Clarke next year, but we will also make more than a G-league team. People need to stop feeling entitled to money before they have accomplished the prerequisites for that job.
To answer your questions. YES. The military pays for all your travels within your orders. YES the military gives you pay for food (Basic allowance for Substance), and YES the military provides the best trainers for your field. Believe it or not, fighter pilots learn from the best they dont just toss u in a cockpit and make u figure it out on your own. Same goes for SEALS, snipers, mechanics, etc . Also, yes the military will provide tutors for you too if you take classes (free of charge)

Any other questions?
 

HoldMyBeer

All-Conference
Feb 22, 2017
2,508
3,512
0
The would pay the college kids less money and most likely be local ads
"Local ads" aren't big market. The pros go to big markets to become global if you wanna link the two get it correct.

Trust me, take a star college basketball player in LA, and another in Kentucky, send em both on autograph tours and see who comes back with more money. In KENTUCKY a college basketball player is "the man", in LA/NY, etc they can't even get into the night clubs for free.

I've lived in LA (as well as Jacksonville, Fl) and trust me, most people there dont give 2 ***** about college sports outside of football.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
Kinda like your post. Why can't a teenager make six figures? NBA still drafts kids that are 19-20 years old that become instant millionaires and they are doing fine. Teen actors are not criticized in this way. Taylor Swift sold 8 million albums at the age of 17 and was fine. What exactly is the issue with this?

Who said they can’t make six figures. I’m thinking I know where the stupidity it here. College athletics should remain strictly amateur. The NCAA already struggles with corruption.

By the way, why’d you leave out the examples or the corrupted, exploited, abused and dope addicted teens? Agenda much? I thought so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,630
33,916
113
seems fair to me...... like its already been said if the school cant use the kid for advertisements... then the kid shouldnt be able to use the school either...

but boosters will still make a ton of money .. the kid will just be in a generic blue and white jersey with no markings... and everyone in Kentucky knows whats up ....... go to malones steak house because clarke is endorsing it..... the jersey doesnt have to say UK or NcAA on it.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
It's not the school that is going to make the athlete the most money, it will be the market that they play in. A popular player in LA is going to make more money off of endorsements than Lawrence, Kansas or Lexington, KY.

Why do you think NBA players want to play for big market teams?...More opportunities to make money through endorsements.
I disagree about college kids. Kids are going to make money because they are recognizable. Outside of a few exceptions, college athletes in LA, Chicago, NYC just aren’t that recognizable. Those are pro sports towns through and through. I have spent 12 years between DC, Baltimore and Philly. People just don’t care about college sports. A company is not going to put money into someone no one cares about. Kash Daniel would have cashed in beyond belief in a state like Kentucky.
 

Dead Cat Bounce

All-Conference
Jan 8, 2003
2,745
4,834
113
Nobody asked me but

1) this seems like a massive advantage for Kentucky with its large and passionate fan base;

2) Barring the development of other systems or mechanisms, it seems to me that this will create a cottage industry of local agents—or maybe national agents selling bundles of localized endorsement packages—and then doing the work of notifying the schools; so

3) my guess would be that the basketball program and/ athletics department will try to set up some plug and play endorsement packages in order to keep the athlete focused on sports and academics, limit corruption, control access to players, maintain brand integrity, etc.

All of this is just WAG on my part.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I think most people are greatly overestimating the ease with which a booster could use a business to pay athletes as an inducement.

Let’s use Joe Craft, arguably UK’s largest booster, as an example. He’s personally a billionaire and can donate as much of his personal wealth as he wants to UK.

Professionally, he’s the CEO of Alliance Resources, which is a publicly traded coal company. Coal companies do not sell to consumers and therefore have little use for endorsements at the company level.

If Craft were to direct Alliance to pay UK athletes for endorsements in order to support the program, knowing that it will provide a negative return for Alliance, then Craft is likely to find himself in hot water with shareholders pretty quickly.

And that’ll be the same case for nearly every booster who’s involved with a large company, particularly if there are other partners or shareholders involved.
Could Joe Craft hire them for a series of PSA's?
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I think most people are greatly overestimating the ease with which a booster could use a business to pay athletes as an inducement.

Let’s use Joe Craft, arguably UK’s largest booster, as an example. He’s personally a billionaire and can donate as much of his personal wealth as he wants to UK.

Professionally, he’s the CEO of Alliance Resources, which is a publicly traded coal company. Coal companies do not sell to consumers and therefore have little use for endorsements at the company level.

If Craft were to direct Alliance to pay UK athletes for endorsements in order to support the program, knowing that it will provide a negative return for Alliance, then Craft is likely to find himself in hot water with shareholders pretty quickly.

And that’ll be the same case for nearly every booster who’s involved with a large company, particularly if there are other partners or shareholders involved.
My friend, there are so many ways.
 

bereaboy

Redshirt
Feb 2, 2008
254
32
0
You do know that the concept of "amateur" athletics is purely mythical and the relative level of amateurism has changed dramatically over the past 100 years since the term was coined.

The only agenda here is that you don't want to see a bunch of young minority athletes get paid after generating billions for others.

Who said they can’t make six figures. I’m thinking I know where the stupidity it here. College athletics should remain strictly amateur. The NCAA already struggles with corruption.

By the way, why’d you leave out the examples or the corrupted, exploited, abused and dope addicted teens? Agenda much? I thought so.
 

UKnCincy_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2008
3,504
4,024
0
Could Joe Craft hire them for a series of PSA's?

Personally, no he could not.

Funds for PSAs for the most part have to come from a non-profit organization. Even when companies want to sponsor one, they typically have to donate the money to a non-profit first. PSAs are regulated and many outlets outright refuse to broadcast any PSA directly sponsored by a for profit company.

If a company wanted to pay for one directly, they essentially have to pay to produce a commercial that looks like a PSA and purchase all of the airtime. Under that approach, Craft would still run into issues in terms of being able to show how this would generate a positive return for his company. Especially when you factor in all of the additional costs just beyond paying the player.

The other issue is that celebrities who appear in PSAs usually have some type of personal interest in the PSA topic and also donate their time to produce the PSA. Trying to funnel large payments by disguising them as compensation for a PSA will immediately raise eyebrows. The issue with raising eyebrows is that, as it stands today, current court precedent means that Craft risks opening himself to criminal liability by trying to conceal what are in fact recruiting inducements.

I’m sure someone in the FBI wouldn’t mind taking down the CEO of a publicly traded company for misappropriating funds in order to bribe players to play for the CEO’s favorite college team.
 

CatJack

Redshirt
Apr 29, 2020
10
7
3
In a perfect world allowing the players to make money off playing basketball at the college level is a good . . .
4.The disconnect between 5*'s and role players will be a team killer
. . .
If kids want to go pro let them,if they choose to play college sports give them a scholarship and let them be college players.

This (#4) could be a real problem with "team chemistry." The 5* guy better start spreading around some of his good fortune to the role players; he won't get far without them. In a sense, he "employs" them to further his opportunities.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
You do know that the concept of "amateur" athletics is purely mythical and the relative level of amateurism has changed dramatically over the past 100 years since the term was coined.

The only agenda here is that you don't want to see a bunch of young minority athletes get paid after generating billions for others.


No. I’m just not stupid as you accused. I see the corruption it will cause. I see the cheating as one school tries to buy athletes and another steers them away. I see the money ruining some kid. But then you think they are all like your little cutie pie Taylor.

I see you don’t give a damn about the kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Personally, no he could not.

Funds for PSAs for the most part have to come from a non-profit organization. Even when companies want to sponsor one, they typically have to donate the money to a non-profit first. PSAs are regulated and many outlets outright refuse to broadcast any PSA directly sponsored by a for profit company.

If a company wanted to pay for one directly, they essentially have to pay to produce a commercial that looks like a PSA and purchase all of the airtime. Under that approach, Craft would still run into issues in terms of being able to show how this would generate a positive return for his company. Especially when you factor in all of the additional costs just beyond paying the player.

The other issue is that celebrities who appear in PSAs usually have some type of personal interest in the PSA topic and also donate their time to produce the PSA. Trying to funnel large payments by disguising them as compensation for a PSA will immediately raise eyebrows. The issue with raising eyebrows is that, as it stands today, current court precedent means that Craft risks opening himself to criminal liability by trying to conceal what are in fact recruiting inducements.

I’m sure someone in the FBI wouldn’t mind taking down the CEO of a publicly traded company for misappropriating funds in order to bribe players to play for the CEO’s favorite college team.
Interesting, so let me get this straight. If Joe Craft set up a nonprofit to publicize
Personally, no he could not.

Funds for PSAs for the most part have to come from a non-profit organization. Even when companies want to sponsor one, they typically have to donate the money to a non-profit first. PSAs are regulated and many outlets outright refuse to broadcast any PSA directly sponsored by a for profit company.

If a company wanted to pay for one directly, they essentially have to pay to produce a commercial that looks like a PSA and purchase all of the airtime. Under that approach, Craft would still run into issues in terms of being able to show how this would generate a positive return for his company. Especially when you factor in all of the additional costs just beyond paying the player.

The other issue is that celebrities who appear in PSAs usually have some type of personal interest in the PSA topic and also donate their time to produce the PSA. Trying to funnel large payments by disguising them as compensation for a PSA will immediately raise eyebrows. The issue with raising eyebrows is that, as it stands today, current court precedent means that Craft risks opening himself to criminal liability by trying to conceal what are in fact recruiting inducements.

I’m sure someone in the FBI wouldn’t mind taking down the CEO of a publicly traded company for misappropriating funds in order to bribe players to play for the CEO’s favorite college team.
Challenge accepted, let me think on my alternatives a bit.
 

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
28,071
30,261
113


I admit that I am ignorant when it comes to licensing, trademarks, etc. But athletes do sometimes wear their jerseys in commercials, as Damian Lillard is here. You can clearly see “PORTLAND” on his jersey. Why is this ESPN commercial different than a State Farm commercial? Not trying to start a war, I am just curious as I’ve seen some comments stating the NBA has restrictions. They obviously don’t restrict all of them, so why should the NCAA?

That is part of the commercial and ESPN has NBA games.
I’m also thinking a player could try to get permission from the school.
 

bereaboy

Redshirt
Feb 2, 2008
254
32
0
You're not stupid. You're just clueless.

No. I’m just not stupid as you accused. I see the corruption it will cause. I see the cheating as one school tries to buy athletes and another steers them away. I see the money ruining some kid. But then you think they are all like your little cutie pie Taylor.

I see you don’t give a damn about the kids.
 
Last edited:

BlueVelvetFog

Heisman
Apr 12, 2016
14,201
19,664
78
If this hurts UK in football—I want no part of it
(Proud “Football Mafia” member)
[smoke]
 

hollcat

Sophomore
Oct 25, 2001
3,513
107
0
All of this is bad idea. Recruits will be going to the school who has the alums with the biggest pockets who will be willing to pay the players. Recruits will be creating a bidding war among colleges. I can hear the recruiting pitch now..."If you come to our school, I can guarantee that you will make $1 million because Joe Bob at Joe Bob's Car dealership, who is an alumni by the way, will pay you $1 million to endorse them. Wait, what?...That other school says they have an alumni wanting to pay $1.5 million to endorse their product?...Well, then, let me get on the phone to line up some more endorsements for you..."

Like I said, this is going to be a very bad idea...

It will create a situation where top recruits will hire an agent before deciding where to go to college so that the agent can be negotiating sponsorship deals and the agent will tell the athlete which school he be attending