I may have missed it....can you link the posts? If I did miss it then that's my fault. Easy to miss when you have so many people firing missiles at you.
No offense but you are tagged in responses to you. You can take a look....
I may have missed it....can you link the posts? If I did miss it then that's my fault. Easy to miss when you have so many people firing missiles at you.
I may have missed it....can you link the posts? If I did miss it then that's my fault. Easy to miss when you have so many people firing missiles at you.
The only problem with that is Ej wants to play the 4 and for all we know was sold on that opportunity to come back. He really isn't a center and doesn't play like one. I see more of Blackshear at the 5 and EJ at the 4 with both covering for each other when the other drifts out towards the perimeter. No reason the 2 can't switch according to defense and the situation each position. If Ej has improved there is no way to keep him and Blackshear off the court at the same time.Blackshear isn't coming here to be a 5. He's being sold the P.J. Washington role; to be the focal point of the front court offense, with inside-outside touches.
For that reason, we may see more of Richards than most in this thread seem to think. Cal is going to want his 5 five man to protect the rim and rebound. Whoever does that better between Richards and Montgomery is going to get the majority of the minutes. Since neither guy has shown much consistency, it will likely be a game-by-game basis on who gets the most minutes. But that spot is not going to be an offensive priority, which may actually give Richards the edge.
Hagans, Maxey and Quickley will take all the minutes they can handle in the backcourt.
Whitney and Brooks will split time at the 3.
Blackshear will play all the minutes he can handle at the 4.
Montgomery and Richards will split time at the 5.
Sestina and Jurzang will have to fight for their minutes, obviously getting more time on nights where we need a boost from the outside.
The only problem with that is Ej wants to play the 4 and for all we know was sold on that opportunity to come back. He really isn't a center and doesn't play like one. I see more of Blackshear at the 5 and EJ at the 4 with both covering for each other when the other drifts out towards the perimeter. No reason the 2 can't switch according to defense and the situation each position. If Ej has improved there is no way to keep him and Blackshear off the court at the same time.
http://kentuckysportsradio.com/bask...-against-georgia-and-he-took-advantage-of-it/Show Montgomery's talent....all i'm asking...
idk but if we get him, this will be the most confident I've felt about a championship run in a minute.Who sits? Personally I think he has shown just in his highlights he would easily sit Montgomery.
Dude is crazy good.
We have these problems every year, or at least we fans think they are problems.The only problem with that is Ej wants to play the 4 and for all we know was sold on that opportunity to come back. He really isn't a center and doesn't play like one. I see more of Blackshear at the 5 and EJ at the 4 with both covering for each other when the other drifts out towards the perimeter. No reason the 2 can't switch according to defense and the situation each position. If Ej has improved there is no way to keep him and Blackshear off the court at the same time.
Great post. I agree, I'm not sure how KB wants to be utilized, but I'm guessing since he has high interest in coming here, that he liked what Cal and Kenny did with PJ. He may want to play like a hybrid 4/5 that gets a lot of points with his back to the basket, but can also play from the outside in.I am sure Cal has figured it out and knows how to play them together.
All we are doing is speculating right now.
The only thing that really gets on my nerves is all the talk about Blackshear has to play the 5 and is a Center and Montgomery has to play the 4.
We really don't know how Cal will play them together.
Yes, Blackshear has played Center his entire career, but that hasn't translated to getting him drafted. It might be that he is looking to transform his game. If so, Cal sticking him in the low post the entire game won't help him.
But maybe Blackshear has come to terms with that and just wants to win a title.
We just don't know.
I do think it's most likely that they will start together, though, if Blackshear comes here.
What their individual roles will be, none of us really knows.
Pure speculation at this point.
I am sure Cal has figured it out and knows how to play them together.
All we are doing is speculating right now.
The only thing that really gets on my nerves is all the talk about Blackshear has to play the 5 and is a Center and Montgomery has to play the 4.
We really don't know how Cal will play them together.
Yes, Blackshear has played Center his entire career, but that hasn't translated to getting him drafted. It might be that he is looking to transform his game. If so, Cal sticking him in the low post the entire game won't help him.
But maybe Blackshear has come to terms with that and just wants to win a title.
We just don't know.
I do think it's most likely that they will start together, though, if Blackshear comes here.
What their individual roles will be, none of us really knows.
Pure speculation at this point.
I think Juzang will score a lot more than 2 a game. Kyle Tucker thinks he will start and he is on at least 2 mocks as a first round pick already.My scoring projections with Blackshear:
Blackshear- 15
Maxey- 14
Whitney- 11
Montgomery- 10
Hagans- 8
Brooks- 6
Quickley- 5
Richards- 4
Sestina- 3
Juzang- 2
Total- 78
Kinda odd that Juzang would crack the starting rotation. I just don't see Maxey, Hagans or Whitney coming off the bench for a 4* guy.I think Juzang will score a lot more than 2 a game. Kyle Tucker thinks he will start and he is on at least 2 mocks as a first round pick already.
I am interested to see if Hagans and Whitney can shoot well enough to play together. Could be some spacing issues there.Kinda odd that Juzang would crack the starting rotation. I just don't see Maxey, Hagans or Whitney coming off the bench for a 4* guy.
If that happens, that means JJ is lighting it up on both ends of the court.
That was Tucker's concern and why he thought Juzang could start. I just have a feeling that IF we get Blackshear, Sestina will be the one that barely plays.I am interested to see if Hagans and Whitney can shoot well enough to play together. Could be some spacing issues there.
Who sits? Personally I think he has shown just in his highlights he would easily sit Montgomery.
Dude is crazy good.
Lots of options for sure, could also put a shooter lineup out there: JJ, Quckley, Maxey, Sestina and MB. Chemistry would be the biggest concern but Cal is usually very good at managing. I would not also be surprised if NR transferred if Blackshear comes.That was Tucker's concern and why he thought Juzang could start. I just have a feeling that IF we get Blackshear, Sestina will be the one that barely plays.
This is the wrong question IMO, and frankly indicative of what is wrong with the way a large number of UK fans look at these things.
To me the point of Kentucky recruiting a deep and talented team should be to gain an advantage over the numerous other schools who can’t attract the same level (or amount) of talent.
So the real question should be how can UK most effectively utilize the talent at their disposal to be the best team they possibly can?
There’s a lot that goes into that, more than just how many minutes a person plays. How can each player develop & be motivated to excel, how can they best be utilized in the floor, what combinations and schemes should be used, etc.?
Having a lot of talent is a luxury, but also a challenge. Maybe that means the pace needs to be increased, maybe the team defense can be extended, maybe the rotations can be optimized etc.
To me the worst thing to do is rather than figuring out the best way to take advantage of all the talent available, to instead automatically start looking for people to sit on the bench.
To me that not only doesn’t utilize your available talent effectively, it tends to create negativity which can negatively impact bench production, which effectively means you’re abandoning the biggest advantage you had acquired in the first place.
Excellent post!This is the wrong question IMO, and frankly indicative of what is wrong with the way a large number of UK fans look at these things.
To me the point of Kentucky recruiting a deep and talented team should be to gain an advantage over the numerous other schools who can’t attract the same level (or amount) of talent.
So the real question should be how can UK most effectively utilize the talent at their disposal to be the best team they possibly can?
There’s a lot that goes into that, more than just how many minutes a person plays. How can each player develop & be motivated to excel, how can they best be utilized in the floor, what combinations and schemes should be used, etc.?
Having a lot of talent is a luxury, but also a challenge. Maybe that means the pace needs to be increased, maybe the team defense can be extended, maybe the rotations can be optimized etc.
To me the worst thing to do is rather than figuring out the best way to take advantage of all the talent available, to instead automatically start looking for people to sit on the bench.
To me that not only doesn’t utilize your available talent effectively, it tends to create negativity which can negatively impact bench production, which effectively means you’re abandoning the biggest advantage you worked so hard to acquire in the first place.
Herro emerging basically forced Cal out of starting 2 PG's last year. I am sure when Cal put the team together he was thinking some combo of Quade, Quickly and Hagans starting at the 1 and 2 and Herro backing up the 2 and 3 (Keldon). Obviously when Quade saw the writing on the wall with Herro he was gone. Somebody will get squeezed out this year that is just the reality of it.Think Juzang vs Whitney could be something to watch.
Remind me slightly of Herro and Johnson coming in last year except there’s a starting spot for only 1 of them.
If juzang plays defense better than we expect, or Whitney plays offense (namely shooting) better than projected. Think that’ll determine who plays more.
KJ wasn’t known for shooting but ended up hitting 38% so who knows. And we all know how Herro improved on defense, so should be interesting.
Gotta remember Juzang is definitely a 5 star talent. Only moved down when he reclassified and committed to us lol.
Herro emerging basically forced Cal out of starting 2 PG's last year. I am sure when Cal put the team together he was thinking some combo of Quade, Quickly and Hagans starting at the 1 and 2 and Herro backing up the 2 and 3 (Keldon). Obviously when Quade saw the writing on the wall with Herro he was gone. Somebody will get squeezed out this year that is just the reality of it.
Think Juzang vs Whitney could be something to watch.
Remind me slightly of Herro and Johnson coming in last year except there’s a starting spot for only 1 of them.
If juzang plays defense better than we expect, or Whitney plays offense (namely shooting) better than projected. Think that’ll determine who plays more.
KJ wasn’t known for shooting but ended up hitting 38% so who knows. And we all know how Herro improved on defense, so should be interesting.
Gotta remember Juzang is definitely a 5 star talent. Only moved down when he reclassified and committed to us lol.
This is the wrong question IMO, and frankly indicative of what is wrong with the way a large number of UK fans look at these things.
To me the point of Kentucky recruiting a deep and talented team should be to gain an advantage over the numerous other schools who can’t attract the same level (or amount) of talent.
So the real question should be how can UK most effectively utilize the talent at their disposal to be the best team they possibly can?
There’s a lot that goes into that, more than just how many minutes a person plays. How can each player develop & be motivated to excel, how can they best be utilized in the floor, what combinations and schemes should be used, etc.?
Having a lot of talent is a luxury, but also a challenge. Maybe that means the pace needs to be increased, maybe the team defense can be extended, maybe the rotations can be optimized etc.
To me the worst thing to do is rather than figuring out the best way to take advantage of all the talent available, to instead automatically start looking for people to sit on the bench.
To me that not only doesn’t utilize your available talent effectively, it tends to create negativity which can negatively impact bench production, which effectively means you’re abandoning the biggest advantage you worked so hard to acquire in the first place.
If Hagans doesn't improve, I'd like to see this unit at times:
G Maxey
G Quickley
F Whitney
F Sestina
F Blackshear
Five players who can space the driving lanes with three guys who can rebound.
I believe there is (possible bug).There should be a way to give more than one like per post. :fistbump:
If Hagans doesn't improve, I'd like to see this unit at times:
G Maxey
G Quickley
F Whitney
F Sestina
F Blackshear
Five players who can space the driving lanes with three guys who can rebound.
Also how do we use Brooks at this point?
If it’s,
Hagans
Maxey
Whitney
EJ
Blackshear
Is he our 6th man or is it Quickley off the bench first?
I could see Whitney and Juzang starting without Blackshear. With Blackshear I think Cal starts EJ and Blackshear at the 4/5. If Brooks is a player you just can't keep off the Court Sestina and Richards are gonna be the one's to lose minutes in my opinion.So do you think Juzang and Whitney both start??
I think Maxey is the one that makes it a little different than last year. He is more of game changer than quade or Quickley was. He and Hagans and pretty much penciled in.
I could see Whitney and Juzang getting similar minutes, but I doubt they both start unless something goes awry elsewhere.
Okay, so here's what we do.Also how do we use Brooks at this point?
If it’s,
Hagans
Maxey
Whitney
EJ
Blackshear
Is he our 6th man or is it Quickley off the bench first?
I think Hagans is guaranteed to start. He is a second year, highly rated point guard, who showed the ability to be the best defensive guard Cal has had if he stays focused. Not to mention he showed to be a pretty reliabe FT shooter. All of those outweigh his lower shooting % and scoring numbers. The experience factor only heightens his chance at starting.It's going to be hard to predict who starts this season. Even Hagans, a returning starter, is no lock.
Very few predicted that Herro would be a starter at this point in the offseason last year. Same with SGA the year before.
Juzang or Brooks could be this year's Herro/SGA. Both are in that 25-40 ranked range like SGA and Herro.
It's not out of the question that both start (if we don't get Blackshear).
I think the only guy guaranteed to start is Blackshear, if we get him.
It's going to be hard to predict who starts this season. Even Hagans, a returning starter, is no lock.
Very few predicted that Herro would be a starter at this point in the offseason last year. Same with SGA the year before.
Juzang or Brooks could be this year's Herro/SGA. Both are in that 25-40 ranked range like SGA and Herro.
It's not out of the question that both start (if we don't get Blackshear).
I think the only guy guaranteed to start is Blackshear, if we get him.
Plenty of minutes for all. No way Richards is going to play 30 min's with the way college refs call games. EJ imo can play with any combination, not concerned with someone playing a certain position.
I think Hagans is guaranteed to start. He is a second year, highly rated point guard, who showed the ability to be the best defensive guard Cal has had if he stays focused. Not to mention he showed to be a pretty reliabe FT shooter. All of those outweigh his lower shooting % and scoring numbers. The experience factor only heightens his chance at starting.
I think Hagans is guaranteed to start. He is a second year, highly rated point guard, who showed the ability to be the best defensive guard Cal has had if he stays focused. Not to mention he showed to be a pretty reliabe FT shooter. All of those outweigh his lower shooting % and scoring numbers. The experience factor only heightens his chance at starting.
Hahahha You’re right, I guess that’s a really good problem to have. Who knows, you may even have to squeeze in Brooks or JJ! Happy to say I believe we are loaded.[laughing]
Too many to remember them all...[laughing]