Zavier Simpson
- Thread starter MGSA99
- Start date
More importantly, when defending him give him a lot of room, go under screens and guard against dribble penetration. The kid is great but even as a senior, he can’t shoot a jump shot to save his life!
All I know is Howard will use the same winning model. Post up the big guy down low and hope for shots or fouls..and Simpson driving looking for a guy cutting down the lane.
Pike needs to be ready .
Pike needs to be ready .
he is at 36% on 3s and 65% on fts. Not a world beater but definitely adequate.
Playing way off him and daring him to shoot takes them out of their offense and what they like to do . No need to hard hedge on him ; just have the big sit in the lane all game . If he hits a few , so be it , but they won’t beat us with him shooting threes
Um yes , did you see how they attacked us last game ? Why would we do the same thing
Have never seen a player more blatantly carry the ball. They're at the top of their game and I'm not sure we can beat the. They're a match up nightmare.
Was thinking the same thing. Keep Simpson in front of you, play off of him and keep Myles/Shaq in the lane. Don't leave the perimeter shooters and let Simpson try those running hook shot twos. Michigan is too good of a 3 pt shooting team for RU to bite on every drive.
Last edited:
Definitely yes. If Simpson beats us shooting a bunch of 3's so be it. It should 100% be the strategy
Last edited:
He’s far more deadly going to the hoop. I’ve watched a few of their games and never seen a star throw up more bricks on jump shots.
He took one 3 against us and it was an airball. Wide open set shot. Just nowhere close to the rim. Then we continued to guard him like he's steph curry. Made no sense
Just play this song..
hold up oscar statues when he acts his way into foul shots... when he badly hooked Myles to get around him and then drew a foul a the basket.. and that became a highlight for the TV guys... that was disgusting..
I didn't say he wasn't better going to the hoop, just pointing out for the season he has been a better 3 pt shooter than everyone on the Rutgers roster except Yeboah who barely nudges him out.
I would play to take away the drive, but you can't just leave him 10 feet open all the time because he has now shown the ability to can those shots at about a 40% clip. MSU tried to go under every screen and double off of him and he shot 4/7.
Isn’t that what Howard is saying about us?
This ain’t no neutral court. This is the RAC baby!
We are playing good ball if you haven’t noticed!
This is one game I really want to see an RU win. Michigan has broken our heart way too often. The RAC needs to be even louder than it has been on Wednesday.
So you would rather let the players who were draining 3's keep taking them then the kid who airballed his?
Making Simpson beat you from the outside also takes other players out of the game. The last thing you want is Simpson dishing the ball all over the court getting his teammates easy looks and getting the whole team into a flow offensively.
Make Simpson a perimeter shooter. Take away his drive. Don't let him be the playmaker. It is the better option
isn’t this how we got into a bind with northwestern? Let’s say Simpson goes off from 3 like northwestern or simply hits a couple like Ron against Illinois. If that happens we are F’d. Let’s play strong tough defense And focus on what we do best.
If you spend all week saying you are going to let Simpson get 3s over 2s and he is on fire then we need to make an overhaul of our entire game plan
I am ok with him driving into trees. He's a little dude who doesn't finish well. He's at his best finding open guys in helter skelter situations which our D creates when we hedge hard. Against him, I would do the exact opposite. Have Tez and Young forget offense for the night. Dog the hell out of him man to man knowing we will get beat sometimes. Force him to be scorer, not a distributor. I don't care if he goes for 30. Just don't allow him to get the other guys involved.
Contrary to his height he is actually quite good at finishing inside amongst the trees, often with his hook shot. He is 71/110 on shots classified as "at the rim" by Hoop-Math and almost none of those are in fastbreak situations.
He is not a good jump shooter, but he is serviceable, and he is worked his way into becoming decent on wide open shots. Some teams still give him those and he usually makes way more than they would like. But he is one of the better guards in the country at scoring in traffic in the lane and a great passer.
Rutgers has a great defense this year. They should probably just keep doing what they usually do. I'd prefer to make Simpson shoot a 3 but would definitely not just give him wide open looks. The thing is, though, as a 3 year starter he has seen essentially every type of ball screen defense possible and knows what to do against them. Now the result might not always be great but he will have a counter to whatever a defense tries to do.
you are saying a player who shoots 36% overall (including end of shot clock heavily contested heaves) could in no way hit 7 of 20 shots (35%) if left unguarded and even 5 of 20 (25%) would be lucky.
That is some interesting use of math!
They dude is a good player. No doubt. But from what I have seen, I would much more like to take our chances forcing him to be a finisher than hedging, keeping his dribble alive, and finding an open shooter or getting the hockey assist.
He most certainly doesn't shoot or finish like he does that. That's clearly his best asset.
I wouldn't leave him open but I would force him to take shots rather than dribble and find people on hedges.
I'd like to see what his % is at the RAC in those situations.
He’s really good. He averages 8 assists per game. You have to stop the penetration as best you can but leaving him open for 3’s is nonsensical
I would play him like a big guy and that can’t shoot . You guys don’t get it ; if we are daring him to shoot it takes them out of their normal off FHA’s . He’s going to be like “why am I open “ should i shoot it or not ? Would you rather him shoot open threes. Him penetrate and kick to guys who shoot threes better than him ,. Or would you rather have him get to the basket and finish or set guys up which he is much better at then shooting threes . It’s a no brainer
I hope Young spends a lot of time defending him. Young really did a good job in the 2nd half of the last game.
I am not saying you sit in the paint and just say shoot.
But I don't slide to him early that for sure. Him being a scorer is not what they do. So make him to that. He's a D1 good player. He will do that on some level. But I take my chances with that more than watching him dribble around our big and find either their big for the score or their big who finds one of their deadly 3 point shooters for the score.
D to me is all about forcing teams to do what they aren't comfortable doing. That's why our strong hedge works a lot. Teams aren't comfortable being sped up and it takes a quick PG with vision who can keep their dribble alive to really beat it. Michigan has exactly that. For Michigan, that isn't hedging on their quick PG who can find guys in broken situations.
Its making him a scorer which he doesn't do quite as well. What is obvious is you don't play him like you did last game. He absolutely wrecked us single handily.
If someone shoots 36% on 3s, maybe 40% when open, you are resigning yourself to allow something like 1.10-1.20 PPP for the game (even allowing the opponent to get no offensive rebounds) if you theoretially let them have an open shot every possession. For comparison, Iowa scored 1.20 PPP in their win over Rutgers in Iowa City.
It literally doesn't matter if you take them out of the offense or whatever, it's just bad ideas to give competent shooters uncontested shots.
The way you defend is to play your normal defense and just shade him to take away the drive. You never give away uncontested shots anywhere on the floor.
Exactly right . You want to to make them do something that they are uncomfortable doing ( making Simpson a scorer and a shooter ). Cannot hedge on him and no reason to . Just go under and chest ball screens so we don’t lose contact on either the roll or a pick and pop
LOL, great use of sample size.
I'll go out on a limb and guess you will not be able to calculate a p value to show us the statistical significance of that.