World Cup

cernjSHU

Senior
Jul 17, 2001
155
447
63
Cape Verde was clearly the team of the tournament. Put Argentina in to OT and scored two goals against the reigning champs. They played their hearts out today and almost took the game into PKs.
I knew Cape Verde was fast and athletic when I saw them against Spain but they didn’t show anything offensively. But, they did show that they were more than just defensive specialists. Awesome show by them and congratulations to all Cape Verdeans for the great display of Soccer.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
Cape Verde was clearly the team of the tournament. Put Argentina in to OT and scored two goals against the reigning champs. They played their hearts out today and almost took the game into PKs.
I knew Cape Verde was fast and athletic when I saw them against Spain but they didn’t show anything offensively. But, they did show that they were more than just defensive specialists. Awesome show by them and congratulations to all Cape Verdeans for the great display of Soccer.
Egypt with lots of questionable and dirty play vs Australia. Didn’t understand the strategy of using different goalie (even though he was experienced) for the PK’s but it didn’t matter as Australia had two attempts that weren’t even on goal.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
Morocco with a strong second half, and back to back quarterfinals as they will also “tri-host” 2030 World Cup.
 

cernjSHU

Senior
Jul 17, 2001
155
447
63
Morocco with a strong second half, and back to back quarterfinals as they will also “tri-host” 2030 World Cup.
Morocco’s World Cup comes to an end when they play France. It’s fun to watch some of the underdogs do well. But in the end, I want ( and I think the world wants) a blockbuster Final Four with Spain v France and Argentina v Brazil/England.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
Morocco’s World Cup comes to an end when they play France. It’s fun to watch some of the underdogs do well. But in the end, I want ( and I think the world wants) a blockbuster Final Four with Spain v France and Argentina v Brazil/England.
WC is like MM. Extremely rare for an underdog like Morocco getting to final four. France looks really strong and they should roll.

How many more venues/games are on your plan?
 

STLPirate12

Junior
Mar 16, 2017
268
295
63
Why are we still calling Morocco underdogs? They reached the semis of the last world cup, which included knockout wins over both Spain and Portugal. They've also won a U-20 world cup and an Olympic bronze medal since then, indicating young talent and high level player development. Perhaps they're not one of the top favorites to win it all, but they're more of a dark horse than a Cinderella and have generally been expected to make a deep run and included in the group of teams considered capable of winning it.
 

Fishjam

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2016
889
3,149
93
Yeah. It's been a weird narrative on this board that the #6 team in the world (who is ranked higher than Netherlands) has been an underdog and also upset Netherlands?
Yeah, games have been very competitive but overall its been very chalky.

The Round of 16 had only 4 teams outside the top 16 in the World Rankings. Paraguay #34 and Canada #30 had the lowest rankings and both were eliminated today. The only 2 remaining outside the top 16 are #21 Norway and #24 Egypt.
 

cernjSHU

Senior
Jul 17, 2001
155
447
63
Yeah. It's been a weird narrative on this board that the #6 team in the world (who is ranked higher than Netherlands) has been an underdog and also upset Netherlands?
Not really a weird narrative. They are a relatively a newcomer to this status. The previous World Cup, they parked the bus and prayed for penalty kicks. That how they beat Spain. That’s not top 10 makeup. This time around they are for real. But you just don’t think of them because they are not historically a top 10 team. Not sure what Solo is insinuating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HALL85

shupat08

Senior
Mar 28, 2006
349
547
93
Not really a weird narrative. They are a relatively a newcomer to this status. The previous World Cup, they parked the bus and prayed for penalty kicks. That how they beat Spain. That’s not top 10 makeup. This time around they are for real. But you just don’t think of them because they are not historically a top 10 team. Not sure what Solo is insinuating.

I mean. I think of them. Maybe you don't? 🤷🏼‍♂️
 

shupat08

Senior
Mar 28, 2006
349
547
93
Anyone else want to make comments that it’s “just Paraguay” Or “Paraguay that bad or is USA that good?”

They have definitely been a formidable opponent this WC. You and I said that from the beginning.

But the way they comported themselves yesterday was pretty embarrassing for the Paraguayan federation, players, and fans imo.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
Not really a weird narrative. They are a relatively a newcomer to this status. The previous World Cup, they parked the bus and prayed for penalty kicks. That how they beat Spain. That’s not top 10 makeup. This time around they are for real. But you just don’t think of them because they are not historically a top 10 team. Not sure what Solo is insinuating.
Agree. Morocco hadn’t even qualified for 20 years before earning one whole point in 2018. They are a great story especially since they will be one of the three host countries in 2030 (along with Spain and Portugal).
 

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,730
3,093
113
I hate the pass interence calls in fb, team throws a 60 yd hail mary, defender slips, pushes the receiver, 1st and 10 on the 1.

I know nothing about soccer. But getting that free kick for that foul yesterday for the only goal seems to me ten times worse. Yeah, rules are rules. But the defender did what is done all the time, the guy defended was not in scoring position, and the guy gets a layup.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shupat08

cernjSHU

Senior
Jul 17, 2001
155
447
63
Where did Brazil go? What team actually played against Norway? Possession completely dominated by Norway. Why would u allow that possession? Give Haaland chances and he is going to deliver. And he did! That second goal, it looked like Brazil wasn’t interested in defending. Poor game plan and poor soccer from Brazil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silkcity Pirate

shupat08

Senior
Mar 28, 2006
349
547
93
I haven't been impressed with Brazil all world cup. They played 1 good half against Japan. Morocco game they did not look good. Then they played Haiti and Scotland.

They finished 5th in CONMEBOL qualifying behind Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, and Uruguay. 2 of those 4 teams also had poor World Cups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silkcity Pirate

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
Where did Brazil go? What team actually played against Norway? Possession completely dominated by Norway. Why would u allow that possession? Give Haaland chances and he is going to deliver. And he did! That second goal, it looked like Brazil wasn’t interested in defending. Poor game plan and poor soccer from Brazil.
If someone told me before the game that Brazil would get two penalty kicks and lose, i would have laughed hysterically.

Haaland is a beast. He’s a space eater that uses his body so well, and has great closing skills. Three way tie for Golden Boot right now.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
184,753
7,473
113
  • Like
Reactions: lokiSHU

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,730
3,093
113

HallLine69

Heisman
Aug 24, 2001
10,503
10,745
112
Rigged scheduling...usa Belgium winner plays sooner than norway/mex-eng

And their semi is a day sooner too
Sorry, but that’s not the case. The schedule and bracket is set far in advance without knowing which teams will advance. And the days and times are staggered to get max tv exposure. What is rigged? (I hate that term ever since a certain politician began wearing it out.)
 

PiratePride

Senior
Jun 3, 2001
543
435
63
Does this happen once in a while? Seems bush league to me. Just like the original call was bush league...2 wrongs...

It doesn't take a soccer expert to see that the process is flawed..... at least hard to understand. Just wish Trump’s call hadn't muddied the waters. The result maybe would have been the same without it. That's pure conjecture at this point.

If Balogun's name was Messi.... the VAR would not have been called for in the first place.. I don't see this as a "two wrongs" issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seton75

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,730
3,093
113
It doesn't take a soccer expert to see that the process is flawed..... at least hard to understand. Just wish Trump’s call hadn't muddied the waters. The result maybe would have been the same without it. That's pure conjecture at this point.

If Balogun's name was Messi.... the VAR would not have been called for in the first place.. I don't see this as a "two wrongs" issue.
From my uneducated pov, the red card was a bad call but it was called. And overturning it after the fact, in favor of the home team named USA, too eye raising.

Do red cards get overruled? If they did it that night via a normal review, it would pass the stink test a little easier for me. Do the refs have final call during the game, or is it reviewed? They sure took a long enough time to make the call.

And you mentioning that Messi never gets that call makes it 3 wrongs. Didnt the announcers even compare tape of a recent Messi play that was very similar as they discussed it in real time and agreed it was a yellow card? But all sports share that one with subjective calls.

The penalty for a red card makes me think it would only be called for a real, real bad infraction. But I guess I am wrong. And getting a free kick in the recent game won 1-0 on that free kick, I find it hard to think anyone sees that as fitting punishment for that foul. Wrong again?

Maybe these issues come up so rarely that it is like me comparing it to when our hoops team was cheated out of the gold in the 68 olympics, but I get the feeling it isnt so rare. This is the first time I bothered watching much World Cup, and I have seen 2 critical calls that have huge penalties being blown.

No wonder they need moats around the stadiums in South America lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PiratePride

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
30,220
11,572
113
It doesn't take a soccer expert to see that the process is flawed..... at least hard to understand. Just wish Trump’s call hadn't muddied the waters. The result maybe would have been the same without it. That's pure conjecture at this point.

If Balogun's name was Messi.... the VAR would not have been called for in the first place.. I don't see this as a "two wrongs" issue.
No sport is devoid of questionable/bad calls and some level of other interference. Overall, this WC has had just a handful given the number of games. The second PK on Norway yesterday may not have been called if the game was still 1-0.

The only thing that makes this red card call reversal looks suspicious is that it took several days to happen. We’ll never know if the phone call had any impact, but it does make you wonder. US fans are certainly ecstatic.

looking forward to a great game tonight.
 

hallsoccer03

Sophomore
Feb 5, 2003
96
168
33
If Belgium were clearly the better team then no one would say a thing. But since UsA has been the better team during the tournament and Belgium and Uefa are scared they make an issue. Does no one have an issue with the improper use of VAR which is the issue here?
 

hallsoccer03

Sophomore
Feb 5, 2003
96
168
33
Norway is a very good team. They out played Brazil.
I do not know what Brazil was doing playing the counter. Norway could not handle the pressure Brazil would have been able to put on. If Brazil controlled the ball and pressured their defense Norway would have crumbled. Instead they sit back and counter? Norway can’t handle that and are and average team with a superstar goal scorer who can change a game at any second