What is funny though..the 2nd place team will get the better draw.
The 1 seed will get an easy 1st game (2nd place team in the weakest group, the Japan group) but then will play the winner of what is most likely gonna be Brazil Germany...yikes.
The 2 seed will play the 1 seed in the easiest group (Japan probably), but then will most likely get Mexico in the 2nd round.
If I'm Belgium/England, I throw away the final group game.
I think that might have been the plan as of Saturday morning, but Belgium beat them to the post by announcing several low grade "injuries" which just happen to have inflicted most of Bel's best players. Nothing serious, but enough to warrant sitting out the next game (v England) to keep their powder dry for the knockout round. England might have pulled something similar, but England didn't play until Sunday, which meant Bel (played Saturday) had the chance to "throw" the match first.
.
Beyond that, this is Belgium's year, because this is the peak year for their Golden Generation, many of whom might be starting to decline, if only a little, by the next WC. Conversely, England is young, and figures to be one of the favorites in four years, as the current stars will be at their peak in 4 years, with Kane as maybe the best player in the world.
.
Further, after years of WC failures, England would take winning the group, and a respectable showing in the knockout stages, and RUN with it. It is something they could build on later.
.
More further, the so-called power clubs haven't looked great. Too many divas/stars, and not enough nitty-gritty players. Germany and Brazil haven't looked that dangerous. On paper, they are supposed to be good, but it hasn't really played out that way on the pitch. Maybe avoiding them isn't the wise decision some thought it would be just 1-2 weeks ago. Some "lesser" teams, at least reputation wise, are playing very well right now. Though it seems strange to think, and could certainly change quickly, maybe the traditional powers aren't as scary as we thought.