Wofford is

revcort

Heisman
Feb 20, 2003
32,522
30,904
113
I will say this about that game: Seton Hall played right into their hands. They never even attempted to throw the ball to the block or establish anything in the paint. That is where UK will give them fits. They have one big man who is strong down low but he won't be able to stop Travis without a double team. On the other end, Reid can defend without a double. Their guards are great shooters but they aren't great defenders. Kentucky will be able to score with efficiency. Wofford will hit some threes but not enough to outscore UK.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
Ranked 13th and 19th in Kenpom and offensive efficiency. And are a top 20 team in rankings. You think that's a 7 seed ?

Dude, they went 1 for 5 against major conference teams. Kansas blew them out by 25 points, we beat Kansas. Mississippi State and UNC easily beat them by double digits, we beat both those teams. Oklahoma easily beat them by double digits, Oklahoma is average. Their only big conference win was over a piss poor South Carolina team.

They're small, they're slow (albeit with a couple great shooters) and have a distinct lack of impressive wins. As 7 seeds go, they're far less intimidating than most.

We have no basis for whining about our bracket this year (although I know that won't stop paranoid guys like you from doing it anyways).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AirRaid08

ZaytovenCat

All-American
Apr 25, 2013
23,984
8,629
97
So, without PJ, UK is just a top 30ish-40ish team?

Sorry, not buying it.
We are a top 15-30 team without PJ. That’s not much separation from Wofford. And if they’re unconscious then they’re probably even a bit better than us. We may have more “talent” but they have a lot more shooting skill and b-ball IQ. They just beat a team by almost 20 that had beat us earlier in the year with PJ. To not be concerned is foolish.
 

ManitouDan_anon

Heisman
Dec 7, 2006
20,073
32,433
0
Glad I checked in here to learn Wollford is the second coming of the 80's Lakers ... Good lord I can be negative , but sweaty palms over a team from the Southern conference or whatever it is . We would have to play close to worst game of the entire year to lose this game. They have a non athletic midget at PG .... Now he might score 25 tomorrow , but he's still a 5'11 slow *** player . With little handles . I cant see us losing this game .. We just need to play our game .. defend the crap out of them at three point line , grab 2 rebounds to their 1 , and this game shouldn't even be close
 

YouKay

Heisman
May 15, 2002
35,671
31,767
113
We are a top 15-30 team without PJ. That’s not much separation from Wofford. And if they’re unconscious then they’re probably even a bit better than us. We may have more “talent” but they have a lot more shooting skill and b-ball IQ. They just beat a team by almost 20 that had beat us earlier in the year with PJ. To not be concerned is foolish.

That was a 1 point game with 4 minutes left. Seton Hall inexplicably let go of the rope after that. Backed off the pressure defense that got them back in it and then Powell started taking dumb shots.
 

YouKay

Heisman
May 15, 2002
35,671
31,767
113
^ This... If we do it again like we just did in the SECT, we will give them a chance and it could get ugly.

UK's opponents in the SEC averaged like 32% on threes. UK beat a better version of Wofford (Auburn) twice, once by 30 without Reid Travis.
 

Rembrandt90

Heisman
Jun 25, 2018
6,758
13,246
0
Those who think Wofford is nothing to worry about are showing foolish hubris. But this game will be about playing hard and playing smart for 40 minutes.

We are down to nine healthy players, so our guys have to stay out of foul trouble. That can be an unpredictable variable in the NCAA Tournament because the officials are on a big stage.

Turnovers and perimeter defense have been bugaboos all year, and could get us beat tomorrow.

Basketball games are about using your strengths against the opponent’s weaknesses. If we had a healthy PJ Washington, this game would tilt UK’s way. But things didn’t work out that way. Cameron Jackson and RT are good baseline players that roughly cancel each other out. Alumna and Montgomery more or less cancel each other out, although Montgomery’s inexperience and tendency to foul are concerns.

On paper, UK has enough athletic perimeter players to make Wofford’s shooters work hard for their shots. But if Keldon Johnson plays well, Wofford has no individual player big enough or athletic enough to handle him on the wing. So I think the game outcome will swing on whether Keldon can score enough points, and whether Wofford’s perimeter shooters wear out in the second half after chasing Herro, Quickley, and Hagans all over the court. Look for Wofford to try a zone defense in the second half, and for Keldon and Herro to test it. If UK can limit turnovers, we should win a competitive game that could be scary in the first half.
 

MarkPftw

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
5,251
6,782
96
Dude, they went 1 for 5 against major conference teams. Kansas blew them out by 25 points, we beat Kansas. Mississippi State and UNC easily beat them by double digits, we beat both those teams. Oklahoma easily beat them by double digits, Oklahoma is average. Their only big conference win was over a piss poor South Carolina team.

They're small, they're slow (albeit with a couple great shooters) and have a distinct lack of impressive wins. As 7 seeds go, they're far less intimidating than most.

We have no basis for whining about our bracket this year (although I know that won't stop paranoid guys like you from doing it anyways).

Did you also think 2017 Wichita St. was a deserving 10 seed ? They were a very similar team with the type of wins they had that season and they also had a big win streak going when UK played them in the 2nd Round that year. Well, the really good 2017 UK team only beat them by three..THREE points in a really low scoring game (for the 2017 UK team), 65-62. All I'm saying is be prepared for a ******* war/tough *** game. 21 game win streaks (I don't care who the opponents were/are) aren't just easily snapped no matter what over confident jackass guys like you think. :sunglasses:
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,332
0
Nobody, I repeat nobody is going to beat us just shooting 3's As good as Wofford is they don't score 80 points a game out there. We can win even giving up 20 three's. It will be something else that beats us if we lose.
 

MarkPftw

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
5,251
6,782
96
Dude, they went 1 for 5 against major conference teams. Kansas blew them out by 25 points, we beat Kansas. Mississippi State and UNC easily beat them by double digits, we beat both those teams. Oklahoma easily beat them by double digits, Oklahoma is average. Their only big conference win was over a piss poor South Carolina team.

They're small, they're slow (albeit with a couple great shooters) and have a distinct lack of impressive wins. As 7 seeds go, they're far less intimidating than most.

We have no basis for whining about our bracket this year (although I know that won't stop paranoid guys like you from doing it anyways).

Oh and btw, which is worse, the "whiny" complainer or the real whiny complainer complaining about the "whiny" complainer ? Think about it. Thanks in advance.
 

MarkPftw

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
5,251
6,782
96
Scott Padgett weighs in on the matchup.


"Scott Padgett is just a whiny ******* who doesn't know what the hell he is talking about. We're going to beat the hell out of these guys by at least 20 because they lost to Kansas, Miss. State, and Oklahoma back in December." - Some of the all knowing basketball wizards in this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoyKent

barryn2000

Senior
Dec 8, 2006
21,194
642
0
Those who think Wofford is nothing to worry about are showing foolish hubris.

Nobody said they were "nothing to worry about". I worry about every game we're not up by 10 with 1-2 minutes. The difference is the doomsayer scenario requires multiple things to go wrong at the same time (in addition to no PJ) to justify that some of us are somehow foolish homers whistling past the graveyard.

Anything is possible, Wofford could beat us with PJ. Especially when you add all the same mental gymnastic "if's" required to elevate the fear of losing without him. If the rest of the team laid an egg like the doomsday scenario, PJ probably couldn't save us (like @UT).

It comes down to probability and plausibility. The Wofford fear IMHO requires too many planets to align to raise my fear of losing to the level some of you have.

One last point. Years ago I had a friend that would predict a Bengal loss every game. I eventually asked him why. He said it was to mentally psych himself, to prepare for the letdown and soften the blow. I wonder how many UK fans are like that and use exaggerated concern as a way of pre-dealing with the stress/depression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: michaeluk26