Withdrawal from Syria

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,228
3,298
113
The rebels may be worse than Assad. Assad allows other religions while the rebels do not and have committed atrocities against others, especially Christians. Syria is a hellhole and will always be a hellhole.
Noooo, you just let em fight in perpetuity. As no long as neither side is winning, they’ll just keep killing each other. Spending money and resources locally and not abroad.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,228
3,298
113
Is that a job Israel, France, and the Brits can do, or do we absolutely need to be there with boots on the ground?
Depends on what this means. If it’s green suit boots on ground, I don’t care if we pull back. We don’t need to be there to do what I’m advocating for.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,228
3,298
113
Yes.

And Trump told us he wouldn't listen to the Generals.
I’m pretty sure that’s not what he said. Regardless, we had 8 years of the Clintons actions with the military to know for certain how they’d behave. Zero chance it would have been good.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
https://www.weeklystandard.com/daniel-halper/obama-fires-top-general-without-even-a-phone-call

Huh.

"A particular point of disagreement was what to do about mischief Iran is exporting to other countries. Mattis is indeed more hawkish on this than the White House was,"
I love how Trumpers constantly point out how EXACTLY like Obama Trump is.

 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
I’m pretty sure that’s not what he said. Regardless, we had 8 years of the Clintons actions with the military to know for certain how they’d behave. Zero chance it would have been good.
Again, it's all a moot point. Trump won and is making our nat sec/fopo decisions now. And he's doing EXACTLY what he said he'd do.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Somehow this thread got derailed. Meanwhile, Mattis and Kelly are soon gone and Biff is off his leash. This is a problem.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
And yet you chose to quote a passage about Mattis being too hawkish for the Obama WH, while he's being too hawkish for the Trump WH. lol. Keep up the good work.

Trump is even less hawkish than Obama, so of course there would be similarities in the relationship with Mattis. My concern is if we need to be there or not, and joint chiefs or not, they're going to have biases. I'm going to guess, for now, that Dog is accurate, and that we are still going to have a presence there, just not officially/uniformed. I'm good with that, with other allies officially there, and our planes able to take out whatever we want. Or Israel.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,228
3,298
113
Trump is even less hawkish than Obama, so of course there would be similarities in the relationship with Mattis. My concern is if we need to be there or not, and joint chiefs or not, they're going to have biases. I'm going to guess, for now, that Dog is accurate, and that we are still going to have a presence there, just not officially/uniformed. I'm good with that, with other allies officially there, and our planes able to take out whatever we want. Or Israel.
I don’t know that to be the case. That’s just what I’m advocating for. If it’s a “out of sight out of kind” play, it’s stupid. Anything happening in Syria though can be dealt with from our Operational positions in Iraq.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I don’t know that to be the case. That’s just what I’m advocating for. If it’s a “out of sight out of kind” play, it’s stupid. Anything happening in Syria though can be dealt with from our Operational positions in Iraq.

The 300 mercs killed, 0 casualties last year gives me hope. I don't know.