Wisconsin
- Thread starter Jnood
- Start date
And how bouta that last statement after the review for targeting. "The hands to the face penalty made it easier for them to not eject the Illinois player because they knew either way Wisconsin would get the first down". Unfortunately I think that was an honest assessment of the situation. Which is total BS. There should have never been a flag thown for targeting. He was clearly going for the ball. Ref's gonna make sure Wisconsin got the first down.
its crazy that they threw a flag for targeting on a guy that wasn't even trying to hit the receiver. It's like a reflex by the ref, when they see that the pass was not going to be completed.
I think he threw it because he didn't know the flag was thrown for hands to the face! Lol
Things must be a little too clicl for comfort. Flags really coming out against illinois.
That ineligible man down field was sketchy. When the ball was thrown, he was 2 yards across the los. When the receiver caght the ball he was at full speed and 5 yards across the los. OL abruptly stops, looking guilty and then gets flagged. Bad call imo
That ineligible man down field was sketchy. When the ball was thrown, he was 2 yards across the los. When the receiver caght the ball he was at full speed and 5 yards across the los. OL abruptly stops, looking guilty and then gets flagged. Bad call imo
Last edited:
Do you understand how logical thought processes work? Or are you just drunk?
1. Thesis
2. Body of Evidence
3. Conclusion
Thesis= Wisky sucks, they get all the calls, and the refs cheat in their favor and give them redos
Body of Evidence: Check out this clip I made showing how two of their tackles are holding as the DEs pass them, then the DE gets called for hands to the face
Conclusion: Not only does Wisky cheat but when the other team responds wisky get the call.
Or you could just spout opinions.