We will be 10-0 in last 10. RPI will be around 7, the other team that will be looked at for a 1 seed is UNC and we beat them head to head. Win out and we get that 1 seed that Lunardi swears will go to an acc team
Win out
- Thread starter Goingfor9
- Start date
Don't hold your breathe.
UNC will beat Duke tonight.
They would need to not make the ACC final for U.K. To have a shot.
UNC will beat Duke tonight.
They would need to not make the ACC final for U.K. To have a shot.
There will not be a 7 loss team on the one line. I venture to say there won't be a 6 loss team on the 1 line if we win out
The committee has already decided UNC is getting a one seed.
I think UNC would need to be blown out tonight and have a terrible ACCT for the committee to take them out of a 1spot.
If we somehow end up with the last 1, I shudder to think of who our 2, 3, and 4 will be.
It won't be pretty.
It won't be pretty.
Based on what???? Lunardi????? i think UK gets it we have the inside guy UNC has cheater U over its head. 10-0 last 10 will go a long way in the argument. I'm a firm believer if we win out we will get the 1
I think we have to win the SEC Tourney to get a 2 seed. Anything less and we are getting a 3 seed.
Bigblue
Bigblue
SEC tourney championship game isnt factored in if we win it, only if we lose it. Been this way for years.
Last edited:
Where do people get this 3 seed nonsense from? If we win through Sat of the SEC tourney and get a 3 seed, Mitch Barnhart should be fired.
This team is a solid 2 and trending towards a 1.
This team is a solid 2 and trending towards a 1.
Probably because they feel, right or wrong, that the committee underseeds us almost every year.
Does anyone here look at what other teams resume's are or what other teams are doing or they think Kentucky plays in a vacuum ?
I think people are having a hard time understanding why UNC is seemingly being talked about as a virtual lock for a 1 seed, when their numbers are not much better than UK's. Reference the post by Jarms24. Excellent thread that showed UK's resume stacked up really close with UNC's. I believe the thread was titled something along the lines of a "sneaky, good resume."