Why you are wrong about OAD's

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team
 
Last edited:

Jazzycat

All-Conference
May 23, 2002
16,087
4,682
113
Good post. Calipari has control over #3 and #4. To that end, he needs to do everything that he can to prepare his teams to be able to effectively run plays and defend in such a way that it puts his teams in a position to win every game, including, calling necessary time outs and making the guys shoot free throws. The other elements are beyond his control - so revamping some of his in game and pregame strategies may pay dividends, if he chooses to make some changes. I think this loss was a very difficult one for the players and coaches. I expect that we will see some shifts in Cal's methodology for next season - just a hunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,171
0
I have no problem with OAD's. They are the most talented and we are adding more history to our resume while cal thrusts UK into lore yet again for a new generation. Can't argue with that.

If I were to get more detailed, I'd say perhaps we shouldn't have gone so hard on the subject and the beast would have been easier to tame. Guys like Briscoe, Bam, Teague etc shouldn't leave after one. Really wish Cal could get a handle on that. Aside from officiating costing us, this has as well.

My main gripe is Cal allowing negative recruiting kill us with talented freshman who aren't sure if they're OAD. Cal has been beaten to a pulp trying to land these. Guys like Kennard can still come here and play multiple years. For some reason Cal can't get that message through. He needs to try harder. It's not going to hurt recruiting to have blues return.
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team
The detailed poster of the year goes to you. You beat Gary4uk by an eyelash.
 

true-blue1

Heisman
May 15, 2007
12,428
10,735
93
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team

Excellent Post!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike-D and brianpoe

TNCatfanforever

Heisman
Apr 3, 2003
22,012
13,794
62
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team
Excellent work here....one more title would be nice but being 62 and knowing how rare a title is I just live being in the discussion every year. Cal has done that. There are about 30-40 great high schoo players each year and great coaches also. Thus a lot of parity...
 
A

anon_013cn8yrfncx2

Guest
"We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's."

OAD did affect this. Mulder was recruited from JUCO to be our shooting guard last year. Then Murray reclassified, was signed, and Mulder sat on the pine. He also sat on the pine this year instead of getting 15 minutes a game which might have made a difference. Expecting him to save our *** yesterday is ridiculous.

Willis got a lot of run this year late but only because WG, who was given a long lease, (in order for him to be a OAD) failed. Willis should have started from day 1 and not been jerked out at every mistake. A more confident DW also might have made a difference yesterday.

You way over-simplified everything.
 

TheWyldKat_rivals45219

All-American
Mar 13, 2016
5,831
5,373
61
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team
Well said!!
 

Montana81

Heisman
Aug 12, 2004
82,726
29,410
113
I didn't always but I think I now agree with you. We had the pieces to get it done this year, 2014, 2010, 2011 and 2015. It wasn't the personnel. It just wasn't our year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

dstroya

Freshman
Jan 28, 2016
71
71
0
Good breakdown Brian but to say OADS had no effect the first 2 years is incorrect IMO. Experienced talent t [know advantage of our inexperienced better talent. I know they had a whole year of experience by that time but the tourney is a different animal. PAT had experience but thanks to BCG not tourney experience really or Darius either. In 11 same situation just later in tourney as they did go on a good run but still inexperience reared it's ugly head against a more experienced team. That's why we finally broke thru in 12, 3 frosh with 2 sophs with FF experience plus Sr Miller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
"We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's."

OAD did affect this. Mulder was recruited from JUCO to be our shooting guard last year. Then Murray reclassified, was signed, and Mulder sat on the pine. He also sat on the pine this year instead of getting 15 minutes a game which might have made a difference. Expecting him to save our *** yesterday is ridiculous.

Willis got a lot of run this year late but only because WG, who was given a long lease, (in order for him to be a OAD) failed. Willis should have started from day 1 and not been jerked out at every mistake. A more confident DW also might have made a difference yesterday.

You way over-simplified everything.


You keep repeating this false narrative.

Mulder was never recruited to be a primary option. He was always a last chance safety valve if all else failed measure.

Pretty well known fact.

Booker leaving was unexpected as was missing on Newman.
 
Last edited:

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Good breakdown Brian but to say OADS had no effect the first 2 years is incorrect IMO. Experienced talent t [know advantage of our inexperienced better talent. I know they had a whole year of experience by that time but the tourney is a different animal. PAT had experience but thanks to BCG not tourney experience really or Darius either. In 11 same situation just later in tourney as they did go on a good run but still inexperience reared it's ugly head against a more experienced team. That's why we finally broke thru in 12, 3 frosh with 2 sophs with FF experience plus Sr Miller.


Respectfully disagree, we didn't go 0 for 50 from 3 vs WV because we were freshmen.

Had Cal forced the swinging the ball side to side or penetration it would be a totally different game.

Our youth didn't hurt us nearly as bad as poor shooting in 10 or 11.

We hit a few 3s and Huggy comes out of Zone. Knight makes a couple shots or Jones hits the gimmies we win both.

We missed free throws in 97 too...
 

d2atTech

All-Conference
Apr 15, 2009
3,477
2,578
0
"We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's."

OAD did affect this. Mulder was recruited from JUCO to be our shooting guard last year. Then Murray reclassified, was signed, and Mulder sat on the pine. He also sat on the pine this year instead of getting 15 minutes a game which might have made a difference. Expecting him to save our *** yesterday is ridiculous.

Willis got a lot of run this year late but only because WG, who was given a long lease, (in order for him to be a OAD) failed. Willis should have started from day 1 and not been jerked out at every mistake. A more confident DW also might have made a difference yesterday.

You way over-simplified everything.

This is Cal's one big weakness. He has to find a way to empower OADs, while enabling multi-year players. With that said, it's on the players to be dominant. Just imagine TJ when he came back for his sophomore year. He abused everyone including davis, and that's how he became the team leader.
 
A

anon_013cn8yrfncx2

Guest
You keep repeating this false narrative.

Mulder was never recruited to be a primary option. He was always a last chance safety valve if all else failed measure.

Pretty well known fact.

Booker leaving was unexpected as was missing on Newman.

Maybe well known to you. I'm not buying

he was signed to play behind two guys just in case. Heck, he didn't play being behind just one. The point is, he was not used, and now folks expected him to perform yesterday. OAD affected that he didn't get time on the court and was eventually thrust into a high level of play when another failed OAD had to sit.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team
Nice post Brian. I think Cal has tried to build more of a longterm foundation but the collateral damage keeps ruining it. I still think we need some experienced talent to get over the hump but I could just as easily be dead wrong.

There is no denying Cal has put us in the position to win a title almost every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueaz and brianpoe

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Maybe well known to you. I'm not buying

he was signed to play behind two guys just in case. Heck, he didn't play being behind just one. The point is, he was not used, and now folks expected him to perform yesterday. OAD affected that he didn't get time on the court and was eventually thrust into a high level of play when another failed OAD had to sit.


He obviously wasnt good enough to play last year.

His defense wasnt good at all, nor was his shooting. In 20 games last year he hit 20% from the field and 16% from 3.

He was always an emergency backup in case we didnt find another player. Which we did.

Tyler was always going to play almost every minute.

Murray was our scorer and we had Briscoe.

We also had Dom.

We cant play everyone just because they are on the bench.

Sounds like you bought the juco hype, which rarely translates.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Nice post Brian. I think Cal has tried to build more of a longterm foundation but the collateral damage keeps ruining it. I still think we need some experienced talent to get over the hump but I could just as easily be dead wrong.

There is no denying Cal has put us in the position to win a title almost every year.


You are absolutely correct, but that experience needs to come from highly ranked kids who are not yet ready to go pro and decide to stay like at every other program.
 

BoxterS

Senior
Jul 8, 2016
1,023
749
0
I have no problem with OAD's. They are the most talented and we are adding more history to our resume while cal thrusts UK into lore yet again for a new generation. Can't argue with that.

If I were to get more detailed, I'd say perhaps we shouldn't have gone so hard on the subject and the beast would have been easier to tame. Guys like Briscoe, Bam, Teague etc shouldn't leave after one. Really wish Cal could get a handle on that. Aside from officiating costing us, this has as well.

My main gripe is Cal allowing negative recruiting kill us with talented freshman who aren't sure if they're OAD. Cal has been beaten to a pulp trying to land these. Guys like Kennard can still come here and play multiple years. For some reason Cal can't get that message through. He needs to try harder. It's not going to hurt recruiting to have blues return.

Great post
 

mash_24

Heisman
Sep 26, 2011
9,300
27,225
108
I agree with the majority of the op. One of the small quibbles I have with Cal. He limits his bench by not giving them more time in the early season games. Before you tell me he is using that time for the freshman one and doners, save it. They aren't learning much in a 40 pt blowout except bad habits. He's the greatest recruiter in the history of the game. He should be using all his resources each year. No reason why UNC was considered to be deeper than us. That being said none of that cost us yesterday. Our bench was great. We just got beat. First half officiating got us off rythem and we could not find the groove we had against. UCLA. I love Cal. Hope he stays another 10-12 yrs. just wish he would change a few small things.
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
I have no problem with OAD's. They are the most talented and we are adding more history to our resume while cal thrusts UK into lore yet again for a new generation. Can't argue with that.

If I were to get more detailed, I'd say perhaps we shouldn't have gone so hard on the subject and the beast would have been easier to tame. Guys like Briscoe, Bam, Teague etc shouldn't leave after one. Really wish Cal could get a handle on that. Aside from officiating costing us, this has as well.

My main gripe is Cal allowing negative recruiting kill us with talented freshman who aren't sure if they're OAD. Cal has been beaten to a pulp trying to land these. Guys like Kennard can still come here and play multiple years. For some reason Cal can't get that message through. He needs to try harder. It's not going to hurt recruiting to have blues return.
You can't force kids to stay against their will. Even if they're told to stay, they still may or may not go
Hopefully (I really doubt it) the NBA and players will negotiate a better plan in the future.
I won't hold my breath.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
28,072
30,262
113
Good post. Calipari has control over #3 and #4. To that end, he needs to do everything that he can to prepare his teams to be able to effectively run plays and defend in such a way that it puts his teams in a position to win every game, including, calling necessary time outs and making the guys shoot free throws. The other elements are beyond his control - so revamping some of his in game and pregame strategies may pay dividends, if he chooses to make some changes. I think this loss was a very difficult one for the players and coaches. I expect that we will see some shifts in Cal's methodology for next season - just a hunch.
I agree. I think he made changes throughout the season that he normally wouldn't. Everyone always has room to improve, no matter their profession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
28,072
30,262
113
he made enough mistakes yesterday to make it pretty plain why they gave gabriel a chance

when diallo came in i hoped they were going to try him there
Unfortunately correct. I was hoping for Willis to be a UK legend.
 

BillyD614

Redshirt
Feb 17, 2009
413
13
0
The one is done is good for the rest of college basketball.........cause if not for that Cal would have a title every other year. He works with a different team every year....NO other coach does that and can get the results he does......
 
Last edited:

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,171
0
You can't force kids to stay against their will. Even if they're told to stay, they still may or may not go
Hopefully (I really doubt it) the NBA and players will negotiate a better plan in the future.
I won't hold my breath.

That's not my point. Kentucky is the only program where freshman go almost yearly that shouldn't. It's a problem special to us because Cal went 0-100 trying to implement this system to get the nost talented recruits. I think we could be just as good or better had we pumped the breaks a tad on our message. For whatever reason, our recruiting pitch has become interpreted at 2 year blues are failures. It's been used against us by coaches like Howard and Capel, and it's worked. A bit self inflicted imo but in fairness Cal probably didn't know people would fully buy in to the extremes of that image.
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
That's not my point. Kentucky is the only program where freshman go almost yearly that shouldn't. It's a problem special to us because Cal went 0-100 trying to implement this system to get the nost talented recruits. I think we could be just as good or better had we pumped the breaks a tad on our message. For whatever reason, our recruiting pitch has become interpreted at 2 year blues are failures. It's been used against us by coaches like Howard and Capel, and it's worked. A bit self inflicted imo but in fairness Cal probably didn't know people would fully buy in to the extremes of that image.
Forgive my dumbness, but can you expound on 0-100?
 

Mike-D

Heisman
Jul 14, 2001
50,129
74,553
113
(Repeating much of this from my response in another post)

I agree that we should have more than one title since Cal arrived, I think he does as well.

The OAD strategy Cal implemented has done the job superbly.

All you can ask for in a recruiting strategy is to be competitive enough to win a title.

No recruiting strategy guarantees a title.


The OAD strategy also brought collateral damage Cal didnt expect:

- Players leaving early that Cal did not recommend they go, nor anyone else, other than their friends and family.
- The culture in which players, and fans, now view a highly ranked kid who stays longer than one season as a failure.


So, why do we only have one title?


The same reasons every other team has for losing in the tournament.

1. Lost to a better team.
2. Injuries
3. Poor execution by the players in big time games
4. Poor execution by the coach in big time games
5. Terrible referees in big time games


My opinion

2010
- Players kept chucking 3's and Cal didnt call one or more TO's to stop this. I dont care about Huggy's vaunted 1-3-1. We had Wall who could penetrate any zone, as well as Boogie and PPat who could score with players draped on them.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who didnt play better and coach didnt take control.


2011 - Players didnt perform - T Jones 0-5 at the the line, Knight 6-23, 3-11 from 3.

OAD had no effect on that game - we had better players, who couldn't make shots, it happens.


2012 - Champs


2013 - Teague and Lamb expected to return, star player tore ACL, team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2014 - Cal did a great job turning the season around, I would like to have seen him zone UConn earlier in the game.

Harrisons couldn't handle Napier and Boatright

50% on free throws as a team

WCS injured. Randle Injured.

OAD had no effect on that game.



2015
- Cal should have called a timeout and set up our offense in final minutes of UW game.

Cal and his stall ball.

Guards did not feed the post.

Poor defense by multiple players on switches.

Poythress injury.

Bad referees

OAD had no effect on that game.



2016
- Booker and Dakari expected to return prior to the season, affected recruiting for the following season.

Team just wasnt talented enough.

OAD had an effect due to players leaving unexpectedly. Not Cal's plan.



2017 - Referees killed our first half.

We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's.

Bam, although beaten to death, did not provide an inside game.

Cal should have called a TO after Monk's shot - he has said himself that he doesnt want the defense to get set up when the tables are turned and his team is going for last shot, so he doesnt call a TO with the ball... bad coaching move.

Last second shot to higher seed.

OAD had no effect on that game.



So, other than those leaving that were not expected to, the OAD has been fine.

We have lost for the same reasons everyone else has:

poor play, poor coaching, poor refereeing, injuries, beaten by a better team

You're one of the best here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Mike-D

Heisman
Jul 14, 2001
50,129
74,553
113
I agree we should have another title. Or two. That's why we have some going insane. Still, even so, Cal has been the first or second best coach in college basketball since he's been here. I think our return rate is way too low from transfers or guys that leave too early for the NBA. That has really hurt us, IMO.

Players first program is great for recruiting, but at times I think it also gives us fits. There is no reason why our only 4 year players are from Kentucky. Plenty of good players out there we could sprinkle in for 4 years outside this state. Problem is, they all think they're one and done when recruited. Double edged sword.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

TnRustyCAT

Sophomore
Feb 27, 2007
2,498
125
0
"We did not shoot the ball well enough. Willis and Mulder missed way too many open 3's."

OAD did affect this. Mulder was recruited from JUCO to be our shooting guard last year. Then Murray reclassified, was signed, and Mulder sat on the pine. He also sat on the pine this year instead of getting 15 minutes a game which might have made a difference. Expecting him to save our *** yesterday is ridiculous.

Willis got a lot of run this year late but only because WG, who was given a long lease, (in order for him to be a OAD) failed. Willis should have started from day 1 and not been jerked out at every mistake. A more confident DW also might have made a difference yesterday.

You way over-simplified everything.
[thumb2]!!!