1st downs for below average opposing offenses? Why does Chins instructions always leave someone wide open?
Last edited:
Seems on those downs we routinely have a linebacker trying to stop a team’s #1 receiver.1st downs for below average opposing offenses? Why does Chins instructions always leave somesome wide open?
1st downs for below average opposing offenses? Why does Chins instructions always leave somesome wide open?
The last play before Iowa’s winning field goal last year comes to mind.We heard Minnesota say it directly and I’m sure Indiana must have had the same feeling. They know certain tendencies/alignments and they take advantage of them. That’s the only explanation for guys WIDE OPEN when a team needs 3 yards and the receiver gets 5 before someone is within 3 yards of him.
THAT is not talent. That is poor alignment or scheme.
I don't love how we stay in our base defense on those third and long situations so much. I know that teams like Iowa and Wisconsin have success with it and that no huddles can limit how much you can sub, but we have let slot receivers kill us the last 2+ years. We do play some Nickel with JoJo, but I had thought we had moved toward playing more DIME on third and long against these spread teams when we moved Bootle inside to cover the slot against NW, but that was no where to be found Saturday.
Because this team is of poor morale. They have no killer instinct on defense. There are more players out there going through the motions than players who want to win every down, every play.
I don't think we fire this coordinator yet. I agree with many that we need some continuity. However, I think talent-wise we're not built for the 3-4 and I also don't understand why we can't have a nickel back out there, unless we're just an empty cupboard.
This team sucks. So far, our coaches have let us down. It's nice to see our offense put up points at home, to a team void of defense but we still lost the game. We get killed by teams with a pulse. We can't beat even mediocre teams. We can't get a yard when we need it. And, like you pointed out, we can't get off the field even when we should be able to.
I believe the apologists, I do think we have major talent issues. I also believe we have major coaching issues. Combine that, we have a team that might not win a game to finish the year. To those of you that think Maryland and Purdue are wins, I really don't think you understand how much disappointment you're setting yourself up for. WE could win. We could def lose too
The longer it goes this is the only thing I can keep coming back to. They still have too many guys with a loser's mentality instead of a killer's mentality. Things get tough and you got guys going, "Man this is really hard, I sure hope we can stop em, we're in big trouble if we don't, I'm tired..."Because this team is of poor morale. They have no killer instinct on defense. There are more players out there going through the motions than players who want to win every down, every play.
I don't think we fire this coordinator yet. I agree with many that we need some continuity. However, I think talent-wise we're not built for the 3-4 and I also don't understand why we can't have a nickel back out there, unless we're just an empty cupboard.
This team sucks. So far, our coaches have let us down. It's nice to see our offense put up points at home, to a team void of defense but we still lost the game. We get killed by teams with a pulse. We can't beat even mediocre teams. We can't get a yard when we need it. And, like you pointed out, we can't get off the field even when we should be able to.
I believe the apologists, I do think we have major talent issues. I also believe we have major coaching issues. Combine that, we have a team that might not win a game to finish the year. To those of you that think Maryland and Purdue are wins, I really don't think you understand how much disappointment you're setting yourself up for. WE could win. We could def lose too
I have a question.. If the older players are so bad and their attitudes are terrible is it not a bad thing to keep playing them as that attitude then trickles down to the younger players one would think. It then becomes harder in the future to instill a new attitude. Losing becomes okay and that is the way it continues going forward.
I think it is a case of a defensive coordinator that doesn’t know how to incorporate the players he has into the schemes he wants to run.
BingoThe last play before Iowa’s winning field goal last year comes to mind.
It'll be interesting to see how many young players are factored into games moving forward now. Obviously the coaches are trying to preserve the 4 game redshirt deal and weighing the pros and cons of playing kids that may not be physically ready yet. Injuries and poor coaching on D hasn't helped either. Pretty much a mess right now.I have a question.. If the older players are so bad and their attitudes are terrible is it not a bad thing to keep playing them as that attitude then trickles down to the younger players one would think. It then becomes harder in the future to instill a new attitude. Losing becomes okay and that is the way it continues going forward.
It'll be interesting to see how many young players are factored into games moving forward now. Obviously the coaches are trying to preserve the 4 game redshirt deal and weighing the pros and cons of playing kids that may not be physically ready yet. Injuries and poor coaching on D hasn't helped either. Pretty much a mess right now.
talent is an issue, but we are very unaware on defense.
Our defensive schemes suck terribly.
I.know nothing of football on a micro level and I see where they are going with the football before its snapped.
Our defensive coach is terrible.
Pelini's defensive scheme was very different from Cosgrove's. They both lined up in a 4-3, but the similarities ended there.Pelini had a better transition because, not only did he keep the defense in tact, he didn't change the defense that much
Yes and no.. They both also used a read and react, 2-gap system up front. So recruiting and utilizing personnel didn't really change.Pelini's defensive scheme was very different from Cosgrove's. They both lined up in a 4-3, but the similarities ended there.
Why are so many people responding to a guy who put "somesome" in his question? Argh I just did too...da fu1st downs for below average opposing offenses? Why does Chins instructions always leave somesome wide open?
Negative plays, penalties use your brain for once. Asian girls?How are there any 4th-and-longs if 3rd-and-longs are so automatic?![]()
Bingo
i was at that game
we lined up , at what appeared to be 10-15 yards off the receiver that caught the ball for a first down
he needed 8 if i remember
and yet no one will entertain the possibility that the game is rigged by play calling. This is the kind of stuff I’m talking about. Obvious head scratchers that give away games.
Maybe a better question is how is that we so often get teams in 3rd and long? We are obviously doing something right. Is it that we have decent coaching on 1st and 2nd downs and then "just ok" coaching on 3rd downs? Maybe our players are bought on 1st and 2nd downs but then are thinking more about hoodies on 3rd down?
In my own admittedly limited view, I believe the answer is that we stay in a base defense with limited coverage options because we don't have a lot of other choices to put in when we can't generate a pass rush and do so poorly vs. the run otherwise.
Because we have no pass rush and our LBs are doodoo
What I do not understand is why teams just do not go 5 wide with all receivers on every down cause the Huskers do not make changes.