Great basketball minds think alike.
We shot 26.7% from 3, or 8 for 30. That is not going to cut it.
We were 17-39 inside the arch or 43.6 %.
With our horrible outside shooting it brought us down to 36.2% overall shooting.
This team has to shoot better from 3 or better yet, just don't shoot so many damn 3 pointers.
8 got 30 from deep gets you 24 points.
If all those shots were taken inside the arc, to get the same number of points the team would have to make 12 shots, which translates to 40% shooting.
You mentioned they shot 43.6% inside the arc.
So all this complaining over outside shots and how they need to focus on shooting it inside the arc is over 3.6% difference in FG%. That is effectively 1 more basket, or 2 more points for them.
My points here-
- they arent great at shooting scoring inside the arc either.
- our outside shooting is statistically bad, but its effectively similar to/not much different than if all those shots were instead taken inside the arc.
- outside shooting is where the game has moved because even shooting 30% from deep is like shooting 50% from inside the arc on those 30 shots and any halfway competent D1 team should be able to shoot 30% from deep(over 250 teams did it last season, including us).
If we shoot even 30% from deep, we most likely win yesterday.
Ok- so there are a bunch of statistics for people to dissect and disagree with. But still- 30% from deep, which is quite reasonable to expect, is equal to 50% from inside the arc on the shots from deep we took last night, and we didnt even shoot 50% overall from inside the arc.
It was just bad shooting overall from everywhere last night- deep and short.