The great thing about this poll is that there is not an obvious answer. It’s not like we are a terrible team with one good player. Most people feel that this is a tournament team. The difficulty of answering this question tells us that we have some scoring depth on this roster.
I now consider myself one of the most interesting people on this board for not going along with the crowd on this one. I chose Berry. I think his shooting will bounce back and, combined with his increased confidence he gained last year in his overall game, will lead to special things this year.
I almost didn't include him, but then I thought - well, he COULD be pretty good this year. Hopefully he's better than that other three-point shooter NU got years ago that we thought would translate well from a lower conference and then...did not.Interesting no one, including me, voted for Langborg. It's hard to feel confident about his scoring when none of us has seen him play. His numbers, though, would suggest he could be #2
Ryan Taylor missed some big shots in a couple of our early games and never got his confidence back. He was a good shooter and a pretty good athlete with good size. He played 3 seasons in the G-League. He shot over 40 percent from the NBA 3 in two of those seasons.I'm hopeful for Langborg and I think in the non-conference he will put up some big numbers.
But I suspect he will be noticed and accounted for by the conference coaches and they will make an effort at shutting him down. That shouldn't stop him, but it likely will limit his production. He strikes me as a super charged Ryan Taylor.
Rivals
Ohio's top RBs include three Big Ten commits, two top Ivy League commits
Rivals
Northwestern first Big Ten offer for high-upside EDGE Chukwu Chidubem
Wildcat Report
Braun retained McGarigle, key players in wake of Fitzgerald hiring at Michigan State
Wildcat Report
Komolafe ready for what comes next after breakout 2025 season
On3
Big Ten, SEC leaders vote to support Protect College Sports Act