Who was the shooter?
- Thread starter Rastafarian
- Start date
I don't agree with all these comments...that's the first thing.As to whether or not they are words of a white supremecist I don't know. My definition of white supremacyUsually you seem a little more level headed but this question is not your best.
My point was that being friendly, collegial, doesn’t mean you can’t be a white supremacist. It was in response to someone replying about his controversial statements and saying you really should see him engage with people and how good mannered he is (paraphrasing).
but since I know I’ll get asked, yes, I do think he was a white supremacist. And he was perfectly within his rights to have that view. when I read the statements he made about his beliefs, I will easily conclude he was a white supremacist. I don’t know how else you define that term other than the exact beliefs he had (which again are perfectly legal and do not justify murder).
Charlie Kirk in his own words: ‘prowling Blacks’ and ‘the great replacement strategy’
The far-right commentator didn’t pull his punches when discussing his bigoted views on current eventswww.theguardian.com
Read the above statements and tell me those aren’t the beliefs of white supremacists. If you don’t agree, I am curious to hear your thoughts on why.
A white supremacist is a person who believes in the ideology of white supremacy, which asserts that white people are superior to people of other races. This belief system holds that white people should dominate society politically, economically, and socially. White supremacy is more than just individual racism; it describes a systemic form of oppression that maintains this racial hierarchy.
Is that what Kirk believed? ..I don't know. I am hesitant to label someone for what I think they believe. I don't follow kirk or any of his college tours. I know he had some ideas I agree with and some I disagree with, just as with a lot of posters on here. No one should b e
murdered for their beliefs
Sad! Sorry you're actually the incredibly violent and awful group you claim everyone else is. You're a danger to society. Friendly fire is crazy work but at least own it you sad, sniveling waste of space
Still waiting for more confirmation, but anybody want to bet whether @fatpuggy and @TigerRagRob will never admit that it was a right wing conservative?
Its not proportional. Most of the violence from our side is defensive fighting off attacks from the left. Every time somebody is shot you run the "he's MAGA" bullshat like you did with the MN crap despite the evidence and all logic. You are a habitual liar and need help. You had the gall to say the people that tried to kill Trump were his own supporters. Like Ive said and many others here all you do is tell lies and project. Its people like you that have pushed us down this road. You got the pull up warning many times and you said you didnt care. So as the plane goes down dont try to play victim when people like you steered us down this path..
The odds are like 1000000 to 1 they ever will but I put it at -200 that Rob dms me for a tit Pic
If the victim was leftwing. If there were far right wing slogans on the shell casings. If the perp was hanging out in KKK chats on Discord (is there even such a thing?).
But the victim was Charlie Kirk. The slogans were antifa. The perp hung out in antifa chats.
Even if he came out and said otherwise i wouldn't believe him because all the evidence says otherwise.
See his post above yours - he still claims the MN shooter was a Dem and ignores that both Trump shooters were registered Republicans. It's like nothing exists except whatever he imagines, and he dreams that all Dems are out to get him personally, and about your tits of course.
So you think all right wing get along? I don't put you in the same boat with Fuentes, so its not like one of his would be you. If the slogans were shown to be known meme's, etc, used in groyper chats, that would mean nothing? Can you show the antifa chats?
He can't show the antifa chats because the Discord story has already been disproven by tmz.
There's no actual reporting that he was in antifa chats. Not saying he wasn't, just saying there's no credible reporting indicating that.
Oh TMZ the reputable source that cheered when it was announced Kirk was shot.
And don't give the car chase excuse, the timestamps prove they were lying.
I just don't understand why that's not even a possibility. NF's groypers have had issues with CK for years. All it takes is someone taking it too far who is not well in the head.
There were plenty of leftists who refused to vote for Kamala because she wasn't left enough. Lots on the left hate Newsom because they think he is anti-trans and too corporate.
Ideologue's in general that get too radicalized would absolutely take out someone they find unpure on their side.
There were plenty of leftists who refused to vote for Kamala because she wasn't left enough. Lots on the left hate Newsom because they think he is anti-trans and too corporate.
Ideologue's in general that get too radicalized would absolutely take out someone they find unpure on their side.
Keep spinning people. This is as clear cut as it gets. Right wing Trump supporters dont shoot Charlie Kirk.
The dumbarse posters are exposing themselves.
The dumbarse posters are exposing themselves.
You have totally taken their bait. Your ideology is so strong that you aren’t thinking rationally. And I get it, the **** they feed is very effective. But so many of the accounts you post are doing so to radicalize you as a political pawn (and yes, this happens on the left too):
Rational is thinking that a right-wing Trump supporter assassinated Charlie Kirk?
Imma take a pass. And laugh at yall while i do.
You just can't stand it that you can't justify violence against Dems now can you? You need it to be true so badly it hurts. What will you do with all that ammo if it was one of yours, amirite?
My God look at this dumbass troll.
i have been saying for literal years that he isn't a serious person... Here it is. Not even willing to admit that he might be wrong.
The disconnect is that to many, the rational thinking is that a Nick Fuentes acolyte killed Kirk.
You're pulling Trump into this but that doesn't seem to apply here.
Sigh ... I don't really care what this nutcase's political affiliation was. He was a nutcase and, IMHO, he didn't speak for anyone other than his crazy self.
And Fatpiggy/Ole Fastball is spinning out of control.
Totally agree but they need it to be a Dem so they have an excuse to go scorched earth against their political opponent while they know they have the power of the presidency to support them.
Look at this dude going through denial. It's like watching the phases of grief in real time.
I am having fun making fun of you. You are totally unhinged. It's fun watching you pretzel meltdown. Keep doing those mental gymnatsics.man this little piggy is down bad. this is sad to watch
Latest
-
01
Tiger Illustrated Football
A major challenge awaits Clemson's defensive front
-
02
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Wednesday Clemson Recruiting Nuggets: Updates on 4 stars Sam Walker, Camden Noe + official visit intel
-
03
Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson is asking a lot of Tait Reynolds under current circumstances
-
04
On3 Football
The Athletic lists 15 Power Four roster budgets estimated to be over $35 million in 2026
-
05
Tiger Illustrated Football
WEDNESDAY INTERVIEWS: Chad Morris, Tait Reynolds, Devarrick Woods