I'm not badmouthing Paul. I like Paul. I think Cam is a more valuable basketball player.
Who Does this Team Miss More...
- Thread starter Rac'nRoll
- Start date
He would not be a leader here… Paul would have been a leader of the youngsters ( JM - Simpson- GG) Cliff would have had his guy. When are you folks gonna understand . Pike is a good coach but can not develop an offense.
Never said you were badmouthing anyone most importantly Paul. Idiot fans from the time he announced his decision were wishing him failure at Washington… go back and look at the early posts. Same with Cam…
No.Harper runs the show by passing to Bailey or shooting off the dribble.Simpson and Davis are complementary players.
Hey I'm perfectly ok with that… I said Harper, Gavin Griffiths , Ace Bailey , J Mike and a B1G…
I don’t think so. I bet we bring in a ball distributor. It doesn’t even appear Dylan plays the primary PG role on his HS team. The kid going to Howard does.
Technically, sure fine. Someone else can dribble the ball up the court
Dylan and Ace are going to be where the offense is running through. Dylan will be relied on to make things happen with the ball in his hands
It’s not just that. After seeing the Ramapo game, I just think Dylan will be at his best playing along a pass first type of complementary guard. He seems to have that now in HS. It doesn’t mean he will never bring the ball up or that he can’t play some point. Curry had that situation his junior year. It’s the best example out there because obviously Curry ran the point for Davidson the following year and still put up big numbers but Davidson as a team wasn’t quite as good and missed the tourney Curry’s senior year.
This is a tough call for me.
My initial thought is Spencer, because we so desperately need someone who can actually put the ball through the rim. He also brings a lot of other things that fill the stat sheet. But if you look at his scoring last year, he was assisted on 62% of his shots (61.2% this year so far). We don't really have anyone who can consistently get him the ball on the roster right now, and he'd be the immediate focal point of every defense we face because we have no other shooters/scorers.
On the flip side, we desperately need a distributor who can get the ball in the hands of players in a position to score and makes the team better around him - which Mulcahy brings. But he himself is hesitant to shoot and isn't really putting points on the board himself.
We'd be much better if we had both back, but if I had to pick only one.... I'd probably hedge very slightly to Spencer.
My initial thought is Spencer, because we so desperately need someone who can actually put the ball through the rim. He also brings a lot of other things that fill the stat sheet. But if you look at his scoring last year, he was assisted on 62% of his shots (61.2% this year so far). We don't really have anyone who can consistently get him the ball on the roster right now, and he'd be the immediate focal point of every defense we face because we have no other shooters/scorers.
On the flip side, we desperately need a distributor who can get the ball in the hands of players in a position to score and makes the team better around him - which Mulcahy brings. But he himself is hesitant to shoot and isn't really putting points on the board himself.
We'd be much better if we had both back, but if I had to pick only one.... I'd probably hedge very slightly to Spencer.
After the talk of Mulcahy losing minutes, he's had a very good stretch the last three games, averaging 27.0 min and 13.0 pts (.714 FG%, .500 3P%, 1.000 FT%).