Your opinion is respected and certainly to be considered, but why exclude the benefits of a Religious foundation through a committed monogamous relationship as not only a viable alternative for children, but arguably the best one?
Where do you stand?
- Thread starter CAJUNEER_rivals
- Start date
Your opinion is respected and certainly to be considered, but why exclude the benefits of a Religious foundation through a committed monogamous relationship as not only a viable alternative for children, but arguably the best one?
Thank you...but I offer fabulous products and a great company that backs them 100%. They sell themselves, I just collect the commission checks! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Oh no....the arguments I had with assignment editors and producers over my reporting got me in plenty of trouble Snow. Just trying to be fair, never mind a propaganda agent!
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/...00, premarital,-residence are accounted for.”
And this article says its up for debate. So, I'm rubber and you're glue, blah, blah, blah.
If your argument is that co-habitation as an alternative can be a viable solution to lower Divorce rates...that's a fair argument to make. If your argument is that co-habitation in and of itself is a better alternative or the best solution to lowering Divorce rates @CAJUNEER will embarrass the Hell out of you because there is no data supporting that argument. Quite the opposite in fact!
I'd quit while I'm ahead if I were you. However you won't, and you'll walk into his buzz saw that will turn your unprovable theory into so much pop psychology confetti.
From my own anecdotal evidence, as I've stated in this thread, I'm the living experiment with hard provable data that a lasting, Loving, monogamous, union between a Man and a Woman honoring Almighty God's prescriptions for a mutually honorable & respectful Marriage is what's best for raising kids.
There are no studies you can present to me with better results than what I'm living using that construct.
Last edited:
Look at the method. The conclusion to your study is baked into the method.
What do you suppose this line means: In fact, since 2000, premarital cohabitation has actually been associated with a lower rate of divorce, once factors such as religiosity, education, and age at co-residence are accounted for.
Here’s a hint: it means they excluded data that would produce an undesirable result. In other words divorces among those who cohabited together first which could be attributed to differences in religion, education, and age were excluded from the study.
Last edited:
I tried to warn @NYC_Eer he was going to get his *** beat. Hard headed loud mouth New York Limousine Liberal is now getting spanked.
Essentially, the methodology he quoted to prove his point was invalidated by the excluded mitigating factors in the study!
Epic fail.
*** whipping severe.
Essentially, the methodology he quoted to prove his point was invalidated by the excluded mitigating factors in the study!
Epic fail.
*** whipping severe.
I did radio for years as did my brother......don't know how old you are but I took my FCC license test with Dean Sturm of Huntington fame and another guy you may have heard of.....Soupy Sales
I remember Soupy Sales. I worked for corporate media companies....Fox, CBS, Gannett, Capital Cities/ABC....it was all formula news and consultant driven BS.
I also remember Jim Thacker as Mr Cartoon long before he started doing ACC basketball
I’m not nearly old enough to remember them but I remember my parents talking about them.
smart assed young punk......AGE DISCRIMINATION......and I'm 1/8 Cherokee.......tribal lawyers will be in touch
[jumpingsmile]smart assed young punk......AGE DISCRIMINATION......and I'm 1/8 Cherokee.......tribal lawyers will be in touch
Damn Snow...that's "old school". I remember my old AFL Sundays in Buffalo listening to Curt Gowdy and Al DeRogatis on NBC.
College games I remember Chris Schenkel and Bud Wilkinson
We're talking 67-71.....old school Baby!
I'm older than dirt....but I still have enough left to take out the trash...if you know what I meanDamn Snow...that's "old school". I remember my old AFL Sundays in Buffalo listening to Curt Gowdy and Al DeRogatis on NBC.
College games I remember Chris Schenkel and Bud Wilkinson
We're talking 67-71.....old school Baby!
Last edited:
I was listening to Dick Viondi on WLS in Chicago the night he got fired.......he said..."Here;s a song for all you virgins out there..."It only hurts for a little while"........poof...he gone
How bout this......remember Dizzy Dean and Pee Wee Rease on the major league game of the week?......."Listen to the jingle, the rumble and the roar"Damn Snow...that's "old school". I remember my old AFL Sundays in Buffalo listening to Curt Gowdy and Al DeRogatis on NBC.
College games I remember Chris Schenkel and Bud Wilkinson
We're talking 67-71.....old school Baby!
I listened to Harry Caray out of Chicago on WGN-TV! Their games were on cable back in the mid 80's. We got the signal carried into Buffalo during Cubs night games!
Holy cow!!!!!!!
face it.......Covid 19 is licking it's chops to get at us old fartsI listened to Harry Caray out of Chicago on WGN-TV! Their games were on cable back in the mid 80's. We got the signal carried into Buffalo during Cubs night games!
Holy cow!!!!!!!
Not me! My immune system is on "overdrive" now with the supplements I've made part of my routine. Not even worried about it...not with all the Vitamins C, D, E, Zinc and iodine coursing through my veins!
Last edited:
