If we are moving on from Frank Haith or not?
Who's the 2nd true freshman?Well, we'll have 3 guys who can really score(two of whom will be true freshmen) & including J. Horne. Maybe Scott can improve on his shooting consistency and then there's Korita-maybe he'll improve on his 3 consistency...or not. We'll have Igbanu who might even figure out how to dunk to go along with his post moves.....and Falokun who turned out to be a project as well as Hewitt(who's a bigger project). One of them might turn out to help. Joiner will help the young ones come along with one or both of them in the running for AACK! frosh of the year. Then there's toughness, both mental & physical, that has to improve.....something that Haith apparently has trouble teaching.
I just don't know. Because of more guys who can shoot it, I believe next year will be better. Just my opinion.
Quincy, I'm afraid I'm a lot like you in describing next year's possibilities...I use a lot of 'mights' and 'maybes' and 'possiblies'Well, we'll have 3 guys who can really score(two of whom will be true freshmen) & including J. Horne. Maybe Scott can improve on his shooting consistency and then there's Korita-maybe he'll improve on his 3 consistency...or not. We'll have Igbanu who might even figure out how to dunk to go along with his post moves.....and Falokun who turned out to be a project as well as Hewitt(who's a bigger project). One of them might turn out to help.
Who's the 2nd true freshman?
True, but Gonzaga has evolved beyond the comparison. They're now part of the elite of college basketball conversation when their name comes up. Truly an amazing job by Mark Few and all of the decision makers that have built that program.Hard to believe that we used to be considered on par with Gonzaga.
True, but Gonzaga has evolved beyond the comparison. They're now part of the elite of college basketball conversation when their name comes up. Truly an amazing job by Mark Few and all of the decision makers that have built that program.
A delusional person.who was it that had a tag signature line of "Haith will have four stars committed by year 3" or something like that?
He probably would if the university didn’t cripple the program so much.
Football can make this argument, incorrectly I think, but it is arguable. Basketball cannot make this argument.
Football can make this argument, incorrectly I think, but it is arguable. Basketball cannot make this argument.
It's been stated before, but if you get good HS players on campus for visits that easily qualify and you lose out on every one of them I have a hard time buying into "the admin is keeping me from getting good players"
You’re right. But there’s a little more to it than that. Thank our friendly provost for that.
Why don’t you ask which players the school will or won’t let in in certain situations.- directed at uredskin
I'm more than happy to concede that our administration has not been flexible enough to make an exception here or there that would be helpful to a coach. I just don't see any evidence that our current coach would land recruits he can't get even when we don't need to make exceptions
Frank’s reputation was as a good coach but ordinary recruiter. At both Misery and here, his best season was his first and his second season was his next best. Maybe he finally figured the recruiting stuff out after 23 years but just in time to be thwarted by the school. That’d be rotten luck.That’s certainly up for debate, but I think the chips would have fallen a little differently over the past couple of years if some things were different.
I'm more than happy to concede that our administration has not been flexible enough to make an exception here or there that would be helpful to a coach. I just don't see any evidence that our current coach would land recruits he can't get even when we don't need to make exceptions
Any chance Haith picks up the Vandy job?
Is there somewhere we can nominate him? Maybe sweeten it and let him go with no buy out since he gave up his retention?